Example 19: Local minimum of at a corner
Find local minimum value of the function given by , .
For , , so .
For , , so .
is not differentiable at , so is a critical point, and changes sign from negative to positive there.
So is a point of local minima.
Hence the local minimum value is .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The graph of is a V with its corner at . At a corner there is no derivative, so the Second Derivative Test, which needs and , cannot even start. The First Derivative Test still works, because it only needs beside the point, not at it: the slope is on the left and on the right, so the graph falls into the corner and climbs out of it.
- Given
- for all real .
- To find
- The local minimum value of .
- Plan
- Remove the modulus by cases; show is continuous but not differentiable at 0, so 0 is a critical point; apply the First Derivative Test; confirm with Definition 4 and check there are no other local extrema.
Basics you need
for and for . Geometrically, is the distance from to 0.
A point where or is not differentiable at . Local extrema can only occur at critical points (Theorem 2). Lesson: maxima and minima
Theorem 3 needs continuous at the critical point and looks at the sign of just left and right of : to means local minima. Theorem 4 needs twice differentiable at (Note after Theorem 4), with . Lesson: first and second derivative tests
is a point of local minima if there is an with for all in .
Solution
Write without the modulus
By Basic 1,
Both formulas give 3 at : , and . So is continuous at 0.
The First Derivative Test (Theorem 3) requires to be continuous at the critical point, so this must be checked, not assumed. A jump at 0 would make the sign of on the two sides meaningless for an extremum.is not differentiable at 0, so 0 is a critical point
With :
(For the left side, .) The two one-sided derivatives differ, so is not differentiable at , and 0 is a critical point. Consequently the Second Derivative Test cannot be used: it needs , and even does not exist.
The book says "the second derivative test fails". More precisely, it does not apply: its hypothesis (twice differentiable at ) is not met. The First Derivative Test has no such hypothesis at itself, only continuity.This is the same corner as at 0 in Example 15; adding the constant 3 lifts the graph without changing any slope.First Derivative Test at 0
To the left of 0, , so . To the right of 0, , so .
So changes sign from negative to positive as increases through 0, and is continuous at 0 (Step 1). By Theorem 3(ii), is a point of local minima, and the local minimum value is
The graph of : the line (slope ) for and (slope 1) for , meeting at the corner . Equal scales on both axes. Falling (slope ) until 0 and rising (slope 1) after: the corner is the bottom of a valley, just a sharp one rather than a rounded one.Theorem 3(ii), Section 6.4. Lesson: first and second derivative testsConfirm with the definition, and check there is nothing else
Definition 4(b). For every real , . So the inequality holds on every interval , and 0 is a point of local minima. (It is even the minimum on all of .)
No other local extrema. At any , is differentiable with or , never 0. So no is a critical point, and by Theorem 2 none is a local extremum. In particular has no local maximum.
The question asks for "the local minimum value", which presumes there is exactly one; this step justifies that.
is not differentiable at (so the second derivative test cannot be used), but for and for . By the first derivative test, is a point of local minima, and the local minimum value is . This agrees with the book's solution.
, , , , . The value at 0 is below all its neighbours, and the drop on each side is exactly (slope 1 in size).
- Differentiating at 0 as if it were 0 or 1. has no derivative at 0; the one-sided derivatives are and .
- Trying . It has no solution; the critical point here is of the "not differentiable" kind.
- Using the second derivative test. It requires and , which do not exist.
- Skipping continuity. The first derivative test is stated for a critical point where is continuous; here it is, but it must be said.
- Critical points include points where is not differentiable; corners of modulus functions are the standard example.
- At such points use the first derivative test (with continuity checked), not the second.
- Adding a constant shifts the extreme value but not the extreme point.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| for , for | Step 1 | Definition of absolute value |
| Continuity at a point by one-sided limits | Step 1 | Section 5.2 (Chapter 5) |
| Not differentiable when the one-sided derivatives differ | Step 2 | Section 5.3 (Chapter 5); Example 15 |
| Critical point; Theorem 2 | Steps 2, 4 | Note before Theorem 3; Theorem 2, Section 6.4 (Lesson) |
| Second Derivative Test needs twice differentiable at | Step 2 | Theorem 4 and the Note after it, Section 6.4 |
| First Derivative Test | Step 3 | Theorem 3(ii), Section 6.4 (Lesson) |
| Local minima | Step 4 | Definition 4(b), Section 6.4 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →