Example 18: : a critical point that is not an extremum
Find all the points of local maxima and local minima of the function given by
.
For , . So does not change sign as increases through 1.
Hence is neither a point of local maxima nor a point of local minima (it is a point of inflexion), and has no point of local maxima or local minima.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
is necessary for a local extremum of a differentiable function, but not sufficient. Here vanishes at , yet it is a square, so it is positive on both sides of 1. The graph flattens out for an instant and keeps climbing: no hill, no valley. The first derivative test calls such a point a point of inflexion.
- Given
- for all real .
- To find
- All points of local maxima and local minima.
- Plan
- Differentiate and factorise; find the critical points; check the sign of on each side (Theorem 3); confirm directly from Definition 4 by writing as a shifted cube.
Basics you need
A critical point is a point where or is not differentiable. Every local extremum is at a critical point (Theorem 2), but not every critical point is a local extremum (Remark after Theorem 2: at 0). Lesson: maxima and minima
At a critical point where is continuous: changes to : local maxima; to : local minima; no change of sign: neither, and is called a point of inflection (Theorem 3(iii)). Lesson: first and second derivative tests
, and a square is positive except where its base is 0. Basics: factorising and the discriminant
If then ; in particular for and for .
Solution
Differentiate and factorise
After taking out 6, the quadratic is a perfect square (Basic 3): its discriminant is , so it has one repeated root. That repeated root is the whole story of this example.The only critical point is
is a polynomial, so differentiable everywhere. . So is the only critical point, and the only candidate for a local extremum (Theorem 2).
The sign of does not change at
For every , , so . Thus for all , and in particular at points close to 1 on the left and on the right.
Sign chart: is on both sides of 1 (and 0 only at 1 itself), so it does not change sign there. For example and , both positive. By Theorem 3(iii), is neither a point of local maxima nor a point of local minima; it is a point of inflexion.
To reach a hilltop the graph must stop rising and start falling; to reach a valley it must stop falling and start rising. Here it rises before 1 and rises after 1, so neither happens.Theorem 3(iii), Section 6.4. Lesson: first and second derivative testsConfirm directly: is a shifted cube
Expand :
So , and . By Basic 4, for we get , and for we get . Every interval contains points with values below 7 and points with values above 7, so neither inequality of Definition 4 can hold: no local maximum and no local minimum at 1.
The graph of : rising everywhere. At the tangent (dashed violet) is horizontal, but the graph passes from below it to above it. Vertical scale smaller than horizontal. This is the Remark after Theorem 2 in disguise: at 0 has derivative 0 and no extremum; our is the same curve stretched by 2 and moved so that the flat point sits at .The book's Remark: no turning points at all
Since on and never changes sign, the graph of has no turning points, hence no local maxima or minima anywhere. (The book's Remark refers to "Example 30", a numbering slip: Example 30 in this reprint is about a car; the Remark is about the present function.) In fact is strictly increasing on : if then , so .
A turning point needs a change in direction, which needs to change sign. A derivative that is a perfect square times a positive number can touch 0 but can never go negative.The second derivative gives , so the Second Derivative Test fails here (Theorem 4(iii)); the book revisits this in Example 21 and goes back to the first derivative test, as we did.
, with the single critical point . Since is positive on both sides of 1, is neither a point of local maxima nor a point of local minima; it is a point of inflexion (at ). The function has no points of local maxima or local minima. This agrees with the book's solution.
, , . The value at 1 is between its neighbours, not above both (as at a hilltop) or below both (as at a valley).
- ", so 1 is a maximum or a minimum." only makes a candidate. The sign test decides, and here it says neither.
- Testing only one side. alone suggests "rising after 1", which fits a minimum; the left side rules that out.
- Using the second derivative test and concluding something. : the test fails and gives no conclusion at all.
- A repeated (squared) factor in gives a zero of without a sign change: no extremum there.
- Critical points are candidates; the first derivative test sorts them into maxima, minima and inflexion points.
- Writing a cubic as , when possible, shows its shape immediately.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Basics: factorising | |
| Critical points; Theorem 2 | Step 2 | Theorem 2 and the Note before Theorem 3, Section 6.4 (Lesson) |
| No change of sign of : neither, point of inflection | Step 3 | Theorem 3(iii), Section 6.4 (Lesson) |
| Local maxima / minima | Step 4 | Definition 4, Section 6.4 |
| has but no extremum | Step 4 | Remark after Theorem 2 (Fig 6.13) |
| No sign change, no turning points | Step 5 | Remark after Example 18 (printed as "Example 30") |
| Second derivative test fails when | Step 5 | Theorem 4(iii); Example 21 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →