Example 23: if
Find , if .
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. ,
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
There is no way to solve for with a formula, so we differentiate the relation as it stands. The only new point compared with Example 22 is the term : since is a function of , is a composite (sine of ), so the chain rule gives . After that, appears in two terms; factor it out and divide.
- Given
- , which defines as a function of (Step 1 shows that it really does). As in the book, we take for granted that this is differentiable.
- To find
- , and where the formula is valid.
- Plan
- (1) See that each gives exactly one , with . (2) Differentiate each term with respect to . (3) Collect the terms. (4) Divide, stating when that is allowed. (5) Show the condition always holds on this curve.
Basics you need
Differentiate both sides of the relation with respect to , treating as a function of ; then solve the resulting equation for (as in Example 22). Basics: solving for dy/dx
If , then : outer function , inner function (Theorem 4). Basics: composite functions
, ; exactly when is an odd multiple of ; has the same sign as for . Basics: trigonometric identities
Solution
The relation really gives one for each , and
Write , so the relation is . Two facts settle what can be.
Size. Since , any solution has . If , then and have the same sign, so , which is , giving . If , then , which is : impossible. So every solution satisfies
Exactly one solution. is continuous, takes the value and , so by the intermediate value property it hits every number in for some in . And is strictly increasing: for ,
because whenever . So cannot take the same value twice, and each gives exactly one .
The book takes it for granted that the relation defines as a function of . We check it because implicit differentiation only makes sense if there is a function to differentiate. The bound will also matter in Step 5. The inequality follows from the sum-to-product formula since and for .Intermediate value property: a function continuous on takes every value between and . This chapter does not state or prove it, but it is a standard property of continuous functions; is continuous by the algebra of continuous functions (Theorem 1, Section 5.2.1). Basics: trigonometric identitiesDifferentiate every term with respect to
The relation holds for every , so both sides have equal derivatives:
Term by term:
- : this is the unknown we want.
- : the outer function is , the inner function is . By the chain rule, .
- .
So
The most common error is to write . That would be the derivative with respect to . We are differentiating with respect to , and changes as changes, so the chain rule adds the factor : "derivative of the outer at the inner, times derivative of the inner".Collect the terms
appears in both terms on the left. Factor it out:
The equation is linear in the unknown : it appears only to the first power, multiplied by things we know ( and ). That is always the case after implicit differentiation, so the next move is always to factor it out and divide.Divide, and state when that is allowed
We may divide by only if it is not zero:
means , which happens exactly when is an odd multiple of . So the formula holds where
This is the book's condition. Division by zero is undefined, so any formula obtained by dividing must carry the condition that the divisor is non-zero. Where the equation in Step 3 would read and would say nothing about .On this curve the condition is never violated
By Step 1, every point of the curve has . The odd multiples of closest to are , far outside . In fact, for ,
so . The formula is therefore valid at every point of the curve, that is, for every real .
The curve , computed numerically. The vertical scale is 4 times the horizontal one, so the wave looks taller than it is. It stays between and , far from the excluded heights . At the slope is . The book states the condition but does not ask whether the curve ever reaches such a . Checking shows it does not: the restriction is correct but, for this particular relation, never bites. The slope is exactly where , at : these are the highest and lowest points of the wave.
, valid where . (This matches the book.) On this curve , so the condition always holds and the formula is valid for every real .
At : , and solving numerically gives . The formula gives
Solving the relation again at and and dividing the change in by gives , the same value. At : , and satisfies ; the slope there is , the top of the wave.
- , without the factor . Every time sits inside a function, the chain rule adds .
- Sign of . It is .
- Forgetting the "1" when factoring: , not .
- Dividing without a condition. State where the divisor is non-zero.
- Implicit differentiation needs only the chain rule: a function of differentiates to (its derivative in ) .
- After differentiating, the equation is linear in : collect, factor, divide.
- An implicit derivative is usually in terms of both and ; to evaluate it at a point you need both coordinates of that point.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Intermediate value property; for | Step 1 | Standard property of continuous functions (not proved in the book); for (Class XI, limits of trigonometric functions) |
| Differentiating a relation that holds for all | Step 2 | Section 5.3.2 (Lesson: implicit differentiation) |
| Step 2 | Theorem 4 (Chain Rule), Section 5.3.1 | |
| Step 2 | Table 5.3, Section 5.3 | |
| Step 4 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI) | |
| ; curve values | Step 5, Check | Computed numerically in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →