Example 24: Derivative of is
Find the derivative of given by assuming it exists.
Let . Then , where .
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. ,
For , , so and
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
We know how to differentiate , not . So turn the question round: if , then , and differentiating this implicitly gives . The rest is rewriting in terms of , and the principal range of decides the sign of the square root.
- Given
- , defined for , with values in . We are told to assume the derivative exists.
- To find
- in terms of , and the for which it is valid.
- Plan
- (1) Write as . (2) Differentiate implicitly. (3) Solve for ; note where . (4) Express in , choosing the sign from the range of . (5) Conclude, and look at the endpoints.
Basics you need
For , is the unique angle in with (principal value branch, Chapter 2). So for . Basics: composite functions
Differentiating with respect to , where depends on , gives . Basics: solving for dy/dx
for every , so . Basics: trigonometric identities
for , and at . Basics: trigonometric identities
Solution
Rewrite the inverse as an equation we can differentiate
Let with . By the meaning of ,
We have a derivative for but not yet for . The equation contains only the function we know. Keeping the range condition next to it is essential: alone has infinitely many solutions , and the range picks out the one that equals . Step 4 will need it.for (Chapter 2, Section 2.3); principal value branch (Chapter 2, Section 2.2).Differentiate both sides with respect to
holds for every in , so the two sides have the same derivative. Assuming exists (as the question allows), the chain rule with outer function and inner function gives
The left side is a composite: sine of a quantity that depends on . Its derivative is times the rate of the inner quantity. The right side is , whose derivative is .Implicit differentiation (Section 5.3.2) with the chain rule (Theorem 4). Lesson: implicit differentiationSolve for , and see where this is possible
In the range , only at , that is, at , that is, at . So the formula is valid for
We divide by , which needs . Translating the condition back to : corresponds to and to . At those two points the equation would read : no finite derivative can satisfy it.Write in terms of , choosing the correct sign
For , the Pythagorean identity and give
So or . Which one? Here , and cosine is positive on that interval, so
Squaring loses the sign, so after taking a square root we must decide it with extra information. That information is the principal range from Step 1. Had we used a branch of the inverse with in , cosine would be negative there and the minus sign would be correct instead. The sign is also visible on the graph: increases, so its slope must be positive.always means the non-negative root, so gives and the sign has to be chosen. Basics: trigonometric identitiesConclude, and look at the endpoints
As approaches from inside, approaches and the slope grows without bound: the graph becomes vertical at the ends.
on , equal scales. At the origin the slope is ; at it is . At the tangent is vertical, so there is no finite derivative there. The derivative does not exist at . For example, at the difference quotient (for small ) grows without limit: with it is already about . This is why the book's table gives the domain of as , smaller than the domain of .Table after Example 24 (Section 5.3.3): , , both on , and on . Lesson: derivatives of inverse trig functions
for . At the function is defined but not differentiable (vertical tangents). (This is the book's result, including the condition .)
At : the formula gives . The difference quotient agrees:
At : , steeper, as the graph shows. Sign check: both values are positive, as they must be for an increasing function.
- Taking , or writing . The principal range fixes the sign as .
- Claiming the derivative exists on . The formula divides by zero at , and the graph has vertical tangents there.
- Confusing with . The derivative of is , a different thing.
- Forgetting when differentiating with respect to .
- To differentiate an inverse function, write it as "original function of " and differentiate implicitly.
- Rewrite the answer in using an identity, and settle every square-root sign with the principal range.
- The same method gives (there , where ) and (using ).
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Principal value branch of is | Steps 1, 3, 4 | Chapter 2, Section 2.2 |
| , | Step 1 | Chapter 2, Section 2.3 |
| Implicit differentiation; chain rule | Step 2 | Section 5.3.2; Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Step 2 | Table 5.3, Section 5.3 | |
| ; on | Steps 3, 4 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI) |
| Table of derivatives of , , | Step 5 | Table after Example 24, Section 5.3.3 (Lesson: derivatives of inverse trig functions) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →