Exercise 3.3 · Q10: Symmetric plus skew symmetric, four matrices
Express the following matrices as the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric matrix:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
For a square matrix , , where is symmetric and is skew symmetric.
(i)
, so is symmetric.
, so is skew symmetric.
(ii)
So , which is symmetric, and , which is skew symmetric as .
(iii)
, so is symmetric.
, so is skew symmetric.
(iv)
, so is symmetric.
, so is skew symmetric.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Theorem 2 gives a recipe that works for every square matrix:
In words: the symmetric part replaces each mirror pair by its average, , and the skew part holds half the difference, . Adding them gives back . This split is also the only one possible (see the last step).
- Given
- Four square matrices: (i), (iv) of order ; (ii), (iii) of order .
- To find
- For each, a symmetric and a skew symmetric with .
- Plan
- For each part: (1) write ; (2) compute and , check ; (3) compute and , check ; (4) check .
Basics you need
: rows become columns. Basics: mirror patterns
Same-order matrices combine entry by entry; halves every entry. Basics: adding only like with like
(mirror pairs equal); (mirror pairs opposite, diagonal zero). Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric
is symmetric and is skew symmetric, so and above always have the right type. Example 22 of the textbook does this for one matrix. Example 22
Part (i)
(i) Transpose, sum and difference
All four matrices are , so every sum and difference is defined.Transpose (Basic 1); entry-by-entry sums (Basic 2).(i) Halve to get and , and check their types
: its mirror pair is , so , symmetric. : diagonal 0, mirror pair , so , skew symmetric.
(i) Check
The sum is the original matrix. ✓
Part (ii)
(ii) Transpose: is already symmetric
The rows of are ; ; . Written as columns they give
because each mirror pair is equal: , , .
Noticing this saves work: if , then and .(ii) and
So
is symmetric (Part (ii), Step 1), and the zero matrix is skew symmetric because .
The zero matrix is both symmetric and skew symmetric. That is why a symmetric matrix can still be written as "symmetric + skew symmetric".
Part (iii)
(iii) Transpose
Rows ; ; become columns:
(iii) and
The entry of is . Both entries of a mirror pair are the same sum, so it is enough to compute the diagonal and one entry of each pair:
Mirror pairs of : ; ; . All equal, so : symmetric.
Each off-diagonal entry of is the average of a mirror pair of ; for instance . Averages of the same two numbers are the same, so is symmetric.(iii) and
The entry of is . On the diagonal this is . Off the diagonal, swapping and reverses the subtraction, so the two entries of a mirror pair are opposite:
Diagonal of is 0; mirror pairs ; ; are opposite. So : skew symmetric.
(iii) Check
Row by row:
- row 1: , , ;
- row 2: , , ;
- row 3: , , .
These are the rows of . ✓
Part (iv)
(iv) Transpose, sum and difference
(iv) , and the check
has equal mirror pair , so it is symmetric; has zero diagonal and opposite pair , so it is skew symmetric. Check:
The sum is the original matrix. ✓
Why this is the only possible split
Suppose with and . Transposing both sides gives . Adding the two equations, ; subtracting, . So necessarily and .
This shows our answers are not just one choice among many: any symmetric-plus-skew split of a square matrix must be this one. So the split found in each of the four parts is the only one possible., Section 3.5.1 (iii); Theorems 1 and 2, Section 3.6. Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric
(i)
(ii) The matrix is symmetric, so it equals itself plus the zero matrix.
(iii)
with the symmetric part
and the skew symmetric part
(iv)
(Textbook answer: the same in all four parts.)
A quick test for any split: the diagonal of must be 0, so the diagonal of must equal the diagonal of . In (iii), has diagonal and has diagonal . ✓ In (i), and . ✓ In (iv), and . ✓
- Forgetting the . and add up to , not .
- Sign slips in . In (iii), and .
- Swapping the roles. The symmetric part comes from the sum, the skew part from the difference.
- Leaving out the check. , and take a few seconds and catch most slips.
- averages mirror pairs; takes half their difference.
- The split exists for every square matrix and is unique.
- A symmetric matrix has ; a skew symmetric matrix has (as in Question 9).
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Transpose | First step of each part | Definition 3, Section 3.5 (Lesson: transpose) |
| Sums, differences, scalar multiples entry by entry | Every part | Sections 3.4.1, 3.4.2 |
| Symmetric , skew symmetric | Type checks in every part | Definitions 4 and 5, Section 3.6 (Lesson) |
| symmetric, skew, sum | Every part | Theorems 1 and 2, Section 3.6; Example 22 |
| Uniqueness of the split | Part (iv), Step 3 | Proved on this page from Section 3.5.1 (iii) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →