Example 22: Symmetric plus skew symmetric
Express the matrix
as the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric matrix.
So is a symmetric matrix.
So is a skew symmetric matrix.
Hence , where is symmetric and is skew symmetric.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Every square matrix splits as
The first piece equals its own transpose (symmetric) and the second piece equals minus its own transpose (skew symmetric). This is Theorem 2 of Section 3.6. The work is just computing , the sum and difference, halving, and then checking the two properties and the sum.
- Given
- The matrix .
- To find
- A symmetric matrix and a skew symmetric matrix , both , with .
- Plan
- (1) Find . (2) Form and check . (3) Form and check . (4) Check .
Basics you need
has the rows of as its columns: its entry is . Basics: reading a table sideways; mirror patterns
A square matrix is symmetric if , that is for all : entries mirror each other across the main diagonal. is skew symmetric if , that is ; putting gives , so every diagonal entry is 0.
Matrices of the same order are added or subtracted entry by entry; halves every entry. Basics: adding only like with like
, and (Section 3.5.1). These are what make the general split work.
Solution
Find
is (square), so is also . Row 1 of () becomes column 1, row 2 () becomes column 2, and row 3 () becomes column 3:
The diagonal entries stay where they are; each off-diagonal entry swaps with its mirror image, for example and trade places.
Symmetry and skew symmetry are both defined by comparing a matrix with its transpose, so is the first thing we need. The split only makes sense for a square matrix, since only then do and have the same order and can be added.Definition 3, Section 3.5. Lesson: transposeCompute and halve it to get
Add entry by entry:
Now halve every entry:
We halve because counts "twice": adding and gives exactly . Without the halves, the two pieces would add up to .Check that is symmetric
Compare each pair of mirror entries of :
Every entry equals its mirror image, so transposing changes nothing: , and is symmetric.
For a matrix there are only three mirror pairs above and below the diagonal; the diagonal entries are their own mirror images. Checking the three pairs is therefore a complete check of . In general , so this always works.Compute and halve it to get
Subtract entry by entry (entry of minus the same entry of ):
Halve every entry:
Subtracting a negative number adds it: and . Most errors in this example happen here, so each subtraction is written out. The diagonal is automatically 0, because a diagonal entry of equals the same diagonal entry of .Check that is skew symmetric
Each mirror pair must consist of opposite numbers, and the diagonal must be 0:
So
and is skew symmetric.
means for every ; the list above checks all nine positions. In general .Definition 5, Section 3.6. A note on the printed book: in its display of , the entry is printed as ; the correct value is , since it is . The book's itself and its conclusion are correct.Check that
Add entry by entry:
The mirror patterns. In , each coloured entry equals its partner across the dashed diagonal. In , each coloured entry is the negative of its partner, and the diagonal is all zeros. This final check confirms both the arithmetic and the method: the two pieces really do rebuild . The fractions combine to whole numbers because, for every position ,Theorem 2, Section 3.6: any square matrix is the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric matrix.This is the only possible split
Suppose with symmetric and skew symmetric. Transposing both sides and using :
Adding and gives ; subtracting gives . So and .
The question asks for "the sum of a symmetric and a skew symmetric matrix", which could suggest many answers. This step shows there is exactly one, so any correct method must arrive at the same and .Uses (Section 3.5.1) and the two definitions , .
Two quick tests. The diagonal of must equal the diagonal of (since has zeros there): in both. And for any mirror pair, is the average and is half the difference of and : for , and , so and , matching and .
- Forgetting the . , not .
- Sign errors in . Subtract the whole entry of : , not 2.
- Expecting a skew symmetric matrix to have a non-zero diagonal. Its diagonal is always 0, which is a useful built-in check on .
- Stopping before the checks. The question is answered only once , and have all been shown.
- For any square : , symmetric part plus skew symmetric part.
- Entry by entry, the symmetric part averages each mirror pair and the skew part takes half their difference.
- The split is unique, and the diagonal of goes entirely into the symmetric part.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Transpose | Step 1 | Definition 3, Section 3.5 (Lesson: transpose) |
| Sum, difference, scalar multiple, entry by entry | Steps 2, 4, 6 | Sections 3.4.1, 3.4.2 (Lesson: addition) |
| Symmetric: ; skew symmetric: , zero diagonal | Steps 3, 5, 7 | Definitions 4 and 5, Section 3.6 (Lesson: symmetric and skew symmetric) |
| , , | Steps 3, 5, 7 | Section 3.5.1 |
| Steps 2 to 6 | Theorems 1 and 2, Section 3.6 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →