Example 23: Powers of the rotation matrix, by induction
If
then prove that
Let be the statement
For , the right side is itself and , so is true.
Assume is true for some :
Then . Let . Using the formulas for and ,
So is true whenever is true.
Hence, by the principle of mathematical induction, is true for all .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Multiplying by adds to the angle. When multiplies a matrix of the same form with angle , the four entries of the product are exactly the four compound angle expansions of and . So each extra factor of pushes the angle up by , and after factors the angle is . Mathematical induction turns this "each step adds " into a proof for every natural number .
- Given
- The matrix above, where is any real number.
- To show
- For every , is the matrix with in place of .
- Plan
- Mathematical induction: state ; prove ; assume and prove by multiplying entry by entry and using the compound angle formulas; conclude.
Basics you need
To prove a statement for every : (a) prove ; (b) prove that whenever is true for some , is also true. Then gives , which gives , and so on without end. Basics: compound angles and induction
For all real :
(Class XI, Trigonometric Functions.) Basics: compound angles and induction
, , and is multiplied by one more . Because matrix multiplication is associative, it does not matter whether the extra goes on the left or the right: , since both are a product of copies of .
Solution
State the statement
For each natural number , let be the statement
We must prove is true for every , for the given (arbitrary) .
Induction needs one statement for each , written so we can plug in or or . Writing out exactly also fixes what "the result for " means: the same matrix with in every entry.Principle of mathematical induction (Class XI). Basics: compound angles and inductionBase case: is true
With , the right side of has in every entry:
which is exactly . Since , is true.
The base case is the first domino. It is easy here, but it must be stated: without it, the inductive step alone proves nothing.Inductive hypothesis: assume
Let be any natural number for which is true, that is,
We now show that must then be true.
We do not claim is true; we only ask "if it were, would follow?" Showing this for an arbitrary covers every link of the chain at once.Write as a product and check the orders
(Basic 4). Both and are : the columns of (2) match the rows of (2), so the product is defined and is . Using the hypothesis from Step 3,
This is where the hypothesis is used: it lets us replace by an explicit matrix that we can multiply. Splitting off one factor of links the -th power to the -th power.Associative law, Section 3.4.6: , which is why and are both . Lesson: properties of the operationsMultiply, one entry at a time
Each entry is (row of ) times (column of ):
Row 1 of is and row 2 is ; column 1 of is and column 2 is . In both terms are negative, so we take out a minus sign; in we just reorder the two terms. These rearrangements are chosen to make each entry match a compound angle formula exactly.Matrix multiplication, Section 3.4.5. Basics: pair up, multiply, addRecognise the compound angle formulas
Put and in Basic 2:
For , note that is with the two terms swapped, which is . Also . So
which is exactly .
The compound angle formulas hold for all real angles, so no restriction on or is needed. This is the moment the idea of the problem becomes visible: multiplying by turned the angle into .Compound angle formulas (Class XI, Chapter 3). Basics: compound angles and inductionConclude by induction
is true (Step 2), and for every , true implies true (Steps 3 to 6). By the principle of mathematical induction, is true for every natural number :
What does. Acting on the column with entries , the matrix gives the column : the point is turned clockwise through on the unit circle. Each further factor of turns it through another , so turns it through . Both conditions of induction have been checked, so the chain of implications reaches every natural number. The picture shows the same fact geometrically: is a rotation through (clockwise, because of where the minus sign sits), and doing it times is a rotation through .
For every natural number ,
proved by mathematical induction.
Take radians and . Then and . Multiplying by itself five times numerically gives with entries , , , (rows 1 and 2), and indeed and . For an exact case, take , which gives the matrices below. The formula predicts that has and , so should be the identity matrix. Direct multiplication confirms it: the entries of are , , and , so , and then .
- Raising each entry to the power . is not the matrix of , , and so on. Powers of a matrix mean repeated matrix multiplication.
- Assuming what is to be proved. In the inductive step you may assume only, and must derive .
- Losing the minus signs. In both products are negative; taking out the minus sign is what reveals .
- Skipping the base case. The inductive step alone does not prove anything about , and so nothing about any .
- For a matrix whose powers follow a pattern, guess the pattern and prove it by induction with .
- The entries of a product of two "rotation" matrices are precisely the compound angle formulas: multiplying the matrices adds the angles.
- The same computation shows more generally that the matrices with angles and multiply to the one with angle .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Principle of mathematical induction | Steps 1 to 3, 7 | Class XI (Basics: induction) |
| Product of matrices, entry rule | Steps 4, 5 | Section 3.4.5 (Lesson: matrix multiplication) |
| Associative law, so | Step 4 | Section 3.4.6 (Lesson: properties) |
| , expansions | Step 6 | Class XI, Trigonometric Functions |
| Equal matrices: same order, equal entries | Steps 2, 6 | Definition 2, Section 3.3.1 |
| Method of this proof | Whole page | Miscellaneous Examples, Example 23 (Lesson: miscellaneous ideas) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →