Class 12 Maths, Worked in Full Past papersGet updates
CBSE Sample Paper 2022-23 · Section D · 5 marks

Q33: (a,b) R (c,d)  ⟺  ad=bc(a, b)\,R\,(c, d) \iff ad = bc is an equivalence relation, or A⊂BA \subset B on P(X)P(X)

The question

(a) Define the relation R in the set N×NN \times N as follows:

For (a, b), (c, d) ∈N×N\in N \times N⁠, (a, b) R (c, d) iff ad = bc. Prove that R is an equivalence relation in N×NN \times N⁠.

OR

(b) Given a non-empty set X, define the relation R in P(X) as follows:

For A, B ∈P(X)\in P(X)⁠, (A,B)∈R(A, B) \in R iff A⊂BA \subset B⁠. Prove that R is reflexive, transitive and not symmetric.

Exam answer

(a) Let (a,b)∈N×N(a, b) \in N \times N⁠. Then ab=baab = ba (by the commutative property of multiplication of natural numbers), so (a,b) R (a,b)(a, b)\,R\,(a, b)⁠.

Why?

Reflexive means every element is related to itself. Here the element is the pair (a,b)(a, b)⁠, so we test (a,b) R (a,b)(a, b)\,R\,(a, b)⁠.

The rule (a,b) R (c,d)  ⟺  ad=bc(a, b)\,R\,(c, d) \iff ad = bc with c=ac = a⁠, d=bd = b asks for ab=baab = ba⁠, which is always true.

Hence, R is reflexive.

Let (a,b),(c,d)∈N×N(a, b), (c, d) \in N \times N such that (a,b) R (c,d)(a, b)\,R\,(c, d)⁠. Then, by the commutative property of multiplication of natural numbers,

ad=bc⇒ cb=da⇒ (c,d) R (a,b)\begin{aligned} &ad = bc \\ \Rightarrow\ &cb = da \\ \Rightarrow\ &(c, d)\,R\,(a, b) \end{aligned}
Why?

Symmetric means: whenever (a,b) R (c,d)(a, b)\,R\,(c, d)⁠, also (c,d) R (a,b)(c, d)\,R\,(a, b)⁠.

For (c,d) R (a,b)(c, d)\,R\,(a, b) the rule needs (first of the first pair) ×\times (second of the second pair) to equal (second of the first pair) ×\times (first of the second pair), that is c×b=d×ac \times b = d \times a⁠.

From ad=bcad = bc⁠, swap the two sides and the order of each product: cb=dacb = da⁠.

ad=bcbc=ad(swap sides)cb=da(bc=cb, ad=da)\begin{aligned} ad &= bc \\ bc &= ad \quad (\text{swap sides}) \\ cb &= da \quad (bc = cb,\ ad = da) \end{aligned}

Hence, R is symmetric.

Let (a,b),(c,d),(e,f)∈N×N(a, b), (c, d), (e, f) \in N \times N such that (a,b) R (c,d)(a, b)\,R\,(c, d) and (c,d) R (e,f)(c, d)\,R\,(e, f)⁠. Then

ad=bcandcf=dead = bc \quad\text{and}\quad cf = de ⇒ adcf=bcde⇒ af=be[c,d≠0]⇒ (a,b) R (e,f)\begin{aligned} \Rightarrow\ &adcf = bcde \\ \Rightarrow\ &af = be \quad [c, d \ne 0] \\ \Rightarrow\ &(a, b)\,R\,(e, f) \end{aligned}
Why?

Transitive means: if (a,b) R (c,d)(a, b)\,R\,(c, d) and (c,d) R (e,f)(c, d)\,R\,(e, f)⁠, then (a,b) R (e,f)(a, b)\,R\,(e, f)⁠, which needs af=beaf = be⁠.

Multiply the two equations side by side: (ad)(cf)=(bc)(de)(ad)(cf) = (bc)(de)⁠. Both sides contain the factor cdcd⁠. Since cc and dd are natural numbers, cd≠0cd \ne 0⁠, so we may cancel it.

(ad)(cf)=(bc)(de)(cd)(af)=(cd)(be)(cd)(af)cd=(cd)(be)cdaf=be\begin{aligned} (ad)(cf) &= (bc)(de) \\ (cd)(af) &= (cd)(be) \\ \frac{(cd)(af)}{cd} &= \frac{(cd)(be)}{cd} \\ af &= be \end{aligned}

Watch out: cancelling is allowed only because cd≠0cd \ne 0⁠. Write the reason beside the step.

Hence, R is transitive.

Since R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, R is an equivalence relation on N×NN \times N⁠.

Why?

An equivalence relation is one that is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. All three must be proved before this conclusion.

(b) Let A∈P(X)A \in P(X)⁠. Then A⊂AA \subset A⁠, so (A,A)∈R(A, A) \in R⁠.

Why?

P(X)P(X)⁠, the power set, is the set of all subsets of XX⁠. Every set is a subset of itself, because each element of AA is an element of AA⁠.

Hence, R is reflexive.

Let A,B,C∈P(X)A, B, C \in P(X) such that (A,B)∈R(A, B) \in R and (B,C)∈R(B, C) \in R⁠. Then

A⊂B, B⊂C⇒ A⊂C⇒ (A,C)∈R\begin{aligned} &A \subset B,\ B \subset C \\ \Rightarrow\ &A \subset C \\ \Rightarrow\ &(A, C) \in R \end{aligned}
Why?

Every element of AA is in BB⁠, and every element of BB is in CC⁠. So every element of AA is in CC⁠, which means A⊂CA \subset C⁠.

Hence, R is transitive.

∅,X∈P(X)\emptyset, X \in P(X) and ∅⊂X\emptyset \subset X⁠. Hence, (∅,X)∈R(\emptyset, X) \in R⁠. But X⊄∅X \not\subset \emptyset (X is non-empty), which implies that (X,∅)∉R(X, \emptyset) \notin R⁠.

Why?

To show that R is not symmetric, one counterexample is enough: a pair in R whose reverse is not in R.

The empty set is a subset of every set. XX is non-empty, so it has an element, and that element is not in ∅\emptyset⁠. So X⊄∅X \not\subset \emptyset⁠.

Watch out: this is why the question says XX is non-empty. If X=∅X = \emptyset⁠, the pair would be (∅,∅)(\emptyset, \emptyset)⁠, and its reverse is in R.

∴\therefore R is not symmetric. Hence, R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.

Where this comes from

Chapter 1, Relations and Functions: Equivalence relation; reflexive, transitive only.

Question type: (a) Show that a relation is an equivalence relation; (b) A relation given by a rule

How to spot it: click to see

(a) Type 3. Show that a relation is an equivalence relation

Spot it: the words "is an equivalence relation", often with "2 divides a−ba - b" or "∣a−b∣|a - b| is even".

Here: The rule is ad=bcad = bc on pairs. For transitive, multiply ad=bcad = bc by cf=decf = de and cancel cdcd⁠, which is not 0 in NN⁠, to get af=beaf = be⁠.

(b) Type 2. A relation given by a rule: letters to prove, numbers to disprove

Spot it: RR is given by a condition, such as a≤ba \le b on R\R⁠, and the set is too big to list every pair.

Here: The rule is A⊂BA \subset B on P(X)P(X)⁠. Reflexive and transitive hold for any sets; to break symmetry, take ∅⊂X\emptyset \subset X but X⊄∅X \not\subset \emptyset⁠.

Found an error?

Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →