Class 12 Maths, Worked in Full Past papersGet updates
CBSE Board Examination 2026 · Section A · 1 mark

Q20: Perpendicular lines x=py+qx = py + q⁠, z=ry+sz = ry + s

The question

Select the correct answer from the codes (A), (B), (C) and (D) as given below.

(A) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and the Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).

(B) Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).

(C) Assertion (A) is true and Reason (R) is false.

(D) Assertion (A) is false and Reason (R) is true.

Assertion (A) : Lines given by x=py+qx = py + q⁠, z=ry+sz = ry + s and x=p′y+q′x = p'y + q'⁠, z=r′y+s′z = r'y + s' are perpendicular to each other when pp′+rr′=1pp' + rr' = 1⁠.

Reason (R) : Two lines r⃗=a⃗1+λb⃗1\vec r = \vec a_1 + \lambda\vec b_1 and r⃗=a⃗2+μb⃗2\vec r = \vec a_2 + \mu\vec b_2 are perpendicular to each other if b⃗1⋅b⃗2=0\vec b_1 \cdot \vec b_2 = 0⁠.

Exam answer

Put y=ty = t in the first line: x=pt+qx = pt + q⁠, y=ty = t⁠, z=rt+sz = rt + s⁠. So its direction ratios are p,1,rp, 1, r⁠.

Why?

With y=ty = t⁠, every point of the line is

(q,0,s)+t(p,1,r)(q, 0, s) + t(p, 1, r)

As tt changes, the point moves in the direction p,1,rp, 1, r⁠: the numbers multiplying tt are the direction ratios.

Similarly, the second line has direction ratios p′,1,r′p', 1, r'⁠.

The lines are perpendicular when

pp′+(1)(1)+rr′=0⇒ pp′+rr′=−1\begin{aligned} &pp' + (1)(1) + rr' = 0 \\ \Rightarrow\ &pp' + rr' = -1 \end{aligned}
Why?

Lines with direction ratios a1,b1,c1a_1, b_1, c_1 and a2,b2,c2a_2, b_2, c_2 are perpendicular when

a1a2+b1b2+c1c2=0a_1a_2 + b_1b_2 + c_1c_2 = 0

Here a1,b1,c1=p,1,ra_1, b_1, c_1 = p, 1, r and a2,b2,c2=p′,1,r′a_2, b_2, c_2 = p', 1, r'⁠:

(p)(p′)+(1)(1)+(r)(r′)=0pp′+1+rr′=0pp′+rr′=0−1=−1\begin{aligned} &(p)(p') + (1)(1) + (r)(r') = 0 \\ &pp' + 1 + rr' = 0 \\ &pp' + rr' = 0 - 1 = -1 \end{aligned}

Watch out: the middle term (1)(1)=1(1)(1) = 1 comes from the yy parts. The Assertion leaves it out.

So Assertion (A) is false (it needs pp′+rr′=−1pp' + rr' = -1⁠). Reason (R) is true, since b⃗1⋅b⃗2=0\vec b_1 \cdot \vec b_2 = 0 means the directions are perpendicular.

Why?

A counterexample to the Assertion: take p=p′=1p = p' = 1 and r=r′=0r = r' = 0⁠. Then pp′+rr′=1pp' + rr' = 1⁠, but pp′+1+rr′=2≠0pp' + 1 + rr' = 2 \ne 0⁠, so the lines are not perpendicular.

pp′+rr′=(1)(1)+(0)(0)=1pp′+1+rr′=1+1+0=2\begin{aligned} pp' + rr' &= (1)(1) + (0)(0) = 1 \\ pp' + 1 + rr' &= 1 + 1 + 0 = 2 \end{aligned}

The Reason is the vector form of the same test: the angle between the lines is the angle between b⃗1\vec b_1 and b⃗2\vec b_2⁠. With the Assertion false, the code is (D).

Answer: (D) Assertion (A) is false and Reason (R) is true.

Where this comes from

Chapter 11, Three Dimensional Geometry: Perpendicular lines in space.

Question type: Perpendicular or parallel

How to spot it: click to see

Type 7. Perpendicular or parallel: test the direction ratios

Spot it: "Show that the lines are perpendicular (or parallel)", or "find kk so that the lines are at right angles".

Here: Put y=ty = t⁠: the first line is (pt+q,t,rt+s)(pt + q, t, rt + s)⁠, so the direction ratios are p,1,rp, 1, r and p′,1,r′p', 1, r'⁠. Perpendicular means pp′+1+rr′=0pp' + 1 + rr' = 0⁠, so pp′+rr′=−1pp' + rr' = -1⁠, not 1.

Also uses Chapter 10, Vector Algebra.

Found an error?

Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →