Exercise 7.2 · Q33:
Integrate the function (Exercise 7.2, "Integrate the functions in Exercises 1 to 37"):
Let .
Multiplying the numerator and the denominator by ,
Writing ,
Put .
Then .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Clear the tangent: . With , the derivative is , and the numerator can be written as
The part integrates to , and the part to a logarithm. This is the book's Example 6(iii) with a minus sign.
- Given
- .
- To find
- , and where the answer is valid.
- Plan
- (1) Find where is defined. (2) Rewrite as . (3) Split the numerator as . (4) Integrate each piece, the second by . (5) Differentiate back.
Basics you need
Substitute and use (standard formula (xii), Section 7.2). Basics: substitution Basics: logarithms and 1/x
Every answer can be checked by differentiating it. Basics: integration undoes differentiation
Solution
Where is the integrand defined?
- must exist: , that is, .
- The denominator must not vanish: , that is, , that is, .
Multiplying by , the second condition says . So on the domain both and are non-zero.
We need to multiply through by in Step 2, and for the logarithm in Step 4.Rewrite without the tangent
Multiply top and bottom by (non-zero on the domain):
Now the denominator has a simple derivative, , and we can relate the numerator to and .Split the numerator
Look for with :
Compare coefficients: of , ; of , . So , . Check: . ✓ Hence
Since , the second fraction has numerator . Its sign is plus here, but this numerator is minus the derivative of the denominator, which will bring a minus sign back in Step 4.Same method as Example 6(iii), Section 7.3.1. Basics: splitting fractionsIntegrate each piece
First piece: .
Second piece: put , so , that is, :
Together (Properties (III) and (IV), Section 7.2.1):
The substitution works because the numerator is the derivative of up to the factor (Section 7.3.1). The modulus is needed: is positive near but negative near , for example.Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2. Lesson: integration by substitutionCheck: differentiate the answer back
Let . With :
Dividing top and bottom by gives , the integrand. ✓
This is the test of an antiderivative (Property (I), Section 7.2.1), and it confirms the sign handled in Steps 3 and 4.
valid wherever and . (Textbook answer: .)
Take and :
- and ,
- slope ,
- integrand: . ✓
- Wrong derivative of the denominator. , not .
- Sign of the log term. The numerator is minus , so the log term comes out with a minus sign.
- Copying Q32's answer. Q32 has ; here it is .
- For a ratio of linear combinations of and , write the numerator as and compare coefficients.
- Then .
- Check by differentiating: it catches sign slips in .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ; at | Steps 1, 2 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI, Chapter 3) |
| Numerator written as | Step 3 | Comparing coefficients; same method as Example 6(iii), Section 7.3.1 |
| , | Step 4 | Properties (III), (IV), Section 7.2.1 |
| Substitution | Step 4 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: substitution) |
| Step 4 | Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2 | |
| checks the answer | Step 5 | Property (I), Section 7.2.1 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →