Exercise 7.2 · Q19:
Integrate the function
Let .
Dividing the numerator and the denominator by ,
Put . Then .
, since .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
As written, the numerator is not the derivative of the denominator (that would be ). But divide the top and the bottom by :
Now the numerator is the derivative of the denominator, so the integral is the logarithm of the denominator: .
- Given
- . The denominator is always greater than , so is defined for every real .
- To find
- in the textbook's form.
- Plan
- (1) Divide numerator and denominator by . (2) Substitute . (3) Integrate . (4) Return to . (5) Differentiate back. (6) Confirm by a second route.
Basics you need
and . Basics: powers
: substitute and use (formula (xii), Section 7.2). Basics: logarithms and 1/x
If , then . Basics: substitution
Solution
Divide the top and the bottom by
Since , dividing numerator and denominator by it does not change the fraction:
With we would get , which does not match the numerator . Dividing by makes the expression symmetric, and then the derivative of the denominator, , is exactly the numerator.Substitute
Let . Then
and the integral becomes
The derivative of is (chain rule with inner function ), which is where the minus sign in comes from. That product is precisely the numerator times .Change of variable, Section 7.3.1; Theorem 5, Section 5.4. Lesson: integration by substitutionIntegrate and return to
The modulus can be dropped because is a sum of two positive numbers, so for every . (In fact , with equality at .)Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2: . Basics: logarithms and 1/xCheck: differentiate the answer back
For a positive , . With , :
The last line multiplies top and bottom by , undoing Step 1. This is the integrand, valid for every real .
The derivative first comes out in the rewritten form of Step 1; multiplying top and bottom by returns the form printed in the question. Getting the integrand back confirms the answer (Property (I), Section 7.2.1).Chain rule, Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1; , Theorem 5, Section 5.4.A second route gives the same answer
Write the numerator as :
In the first fraction the numerator is the derivative of , so
This is the same function as before, since :
Two different methods landing on identical functions is a strong check. Here the two forms are equal exactly, not just up to a constant.
Equivalently . (Textbook answer: .)
Let and look near with :
- and .
- Slope estimate: .
- Integrand at : .
They agree.
- Writing straight away. That would need the numerator to be ; differentiating gives , not the integrand.
- Getting the sign of wrong. It is , which is what turns the plus in the denominator into the minus in the numerator.
- Splitting the fraction as and stopping. Each piece is harder than the original; rewrite first.
- If the numerator is not quite the derivative of the denominator, try multiplying or dividing top and bottom by a suitable factor (here ).
- ; drop the modulus only when everywhere.
- Question 20 is the same idea with in place of .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Laws of indices, | Steps 1, 3 | Section 5.4 |
| , | Steps 2, 4 | Theorem 5, Section 5.4 |
| Chain rule | Steps 2, 4 | Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Change of variable (substitution) | Steps 2, 5 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: integration by substitution) |
| Steps 3, 5 | Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2 | |
| ; sum rule | Step 5 | Formula (i), Section 7.2; Property (III), Section 7.2.1 |
| , | Step 5 | Properties of logarithms, Section 5.4 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →