Exercise 7.2 · Q17:
Integrate the function
Let .
Put . Then .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Dividing by is the same as multiplying by . The integrand then contains the exponent and, up to a constant, its derivative . So put ; the integral becomes .
- Given
- . Since for every real , is defined everywhere.
- To find
- .
- Plan
- (1) Rewrite as . (2) Substitute . (3) Integrate . (4) Return to and write the answer in the book's form. (5) Differentiate back.
Basics you need
for every real . Basics: powers
If , then ; a constant multiple of in the integrand can be traded for . Basics: substitution
(standard formula (xi), Section 7.2). Basics: integration undoes differentiation
Solution
Rewrite the integrand
In this form the integrand is visibly "something times ", and we can ask whether that something is the derivative of the exponent. The derivative of is , which is times the factor in front. So the substitution will work.Substitute
Let . Then , so
Therefore
We solved for exactly the product that the integrand contains. Choosing (rather than ) makes the new integrand the plain of the standard formula, with no minus sign in the exponent.Change of variable, Section 7.3.1; constants come outside, Property (IV), Section 7.2.1. Lesson: integration by substitutionIntegrate and return to
The last line rewrites as , which is how the textbook states the answer. The two forms are the same function.Standard formula (xi), Section 7.2: .Check: differentiate the answer back
By the chain rule (outer , inner with ):
This is the integrand, valid for every real .
The inner derivative times the constant gives exactly , the factor in front of the exponential. Getting the integrand back confirms the answer (Property (I), Section 7.2.1).Chain rule, Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1; , Theorem 5, Section 5.4.The same with
If instead we put , then and the integral is . Since , this equals , the same answer.
Either substitution works. The one in Step 2 is a little quicker because it lands directly on the standard formula .
(Textbook answer: .)
Let and look near with :
- and .
- Slope estimate: .
- Integrand at : .
They agree.
- Losing the minus sign. The answer is negative: . Differentiating gives .
- Trying alone. Without the factor there is no derivative to absorb, and that integral has no elementary antiderivative (Remark (ii), Section 7.2). The is what makes this question work.
- Treating as . , a different function.
- . Look for the derivative of the exponent as a factor.
- Rewrite quotients with negative exponents first; the pattern is then easier to see.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Steps 1, 3 | Laws of indices | |
| Change of variable (substitution) | Steps 2, 5 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: integration by substitution) |
| Step 2 | Property (IV), Section 7.2.1 | |
| Step 3 | Standard formula (xi), Section 7.2 | |
| ; chain rule | Steps 4, 5 | Theorem 5, Section 5.4; Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Some functions have no elementary antiderivative | Common mistake 2 | Remark (ii), Section 7.2 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →