Miscellaneous · Q1: has its maximum at
Show that the function given by has maximum at .
Here , . By the quotient rule,
.
For , , so ; for , , so . So increases up to and decreases after it.
has its maximum at , and the maximum value is . Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
If a function rises all the way up to a point and falls all the way after it, then its value at that point is the largest value it ever takes. So we find where changes from positive to negative, and we check the sign of on the whole domain, not just near the point. That turns "a local maximum" into "the maximum".
- Given
- , where, as in Chapter 5, means the natural logarithm (base ).
- To show
- has its maximum value at .
- Plan
- (1) Find the domain. (2) Differentiate with the quotient rule. (3) Solve . (4) Find the sign of on each side. (5) Use Theorem 1 to show for every other in the domain. (6) Confirm with the second derivative test. (7) Compute the maximum value.
Basics you need
is defined only for ; , ; and is strictly increasing, so . Its derivative is (Theorem 5 (2), Section 5.4).
wherever (Section 5.3, rule (3)).
If is continuous on and differentiable on , then on makes increasing on , and makes it decreasing. The Mean Value step in the book's proof, , even gives strict inequalities. Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions
Definition 3, Section 6.4: has its maximum value on I at when for every in I. Theorem 4 (second derivative test): and make a point of local maxima. Lesson: derivative tests
A quotient with a positive denominator has the sign of its numerator. Basics: sign of a product
Solution
The domain is
exists only for , and then the denominator is not zero either. So the domain of is the interval
On it, is a quotient of two differentiable functions with a non-zero denominator, so is continuous and differentiable at every point.
"Maximum" always means "maximum on some set". Here the only sensible set is the whole domain, so we must know what it is. Negative and are simply not available.Natural logarithm: defined for positive numbers only (Basic 1).Differentiate with the quotient rule
Take and , so and :
for every , which is what makes the numerator so simple. The quotient rule is allowed because on the domain.Quotient rule (Basic 2) and (Basic 1).The only critical point is
Since is differentiable at every point of its domain, there are no critical points of the other kind, so is the only critical point.
A fraction is zero exactly when its numerator is zero (the denominator is positive here). has the single solution , because and is one-one. By Theorem 2, Section 6.4, a maximum inside the domain can only occur at a critical point, so is the only candidate.Critical point: or not differentiable at (Note after Theorem 2, Section 6.4). Lesson: maxima and minimaSign of : positive before , negative after
The denominator is positive, so has the sign of :
- for : , so and ;
- for : , so .
Test points: and .
Sign chart on the domain , not to scale (the open circle at 0 marks that 0 is not in the domain): changes from to at . Comparing with 1 is the same as comparing with , because is strictly increasing. So the sign question reduces to "is less than or greater than ?".Positive denominator keeps the sign of the numerator (Basic 5). Basics: sign of a productbeats every other value on the whole domain
Left of . Take any with . is continuous on and on , so by Theorem 1 (with the strict inequality from its proof)
Right of . Take any . is continuous on and on , so is decreasing there and
Together: for every in . By Definition 3, Section 6.4, has its maximum value on its domain at , and at no other point.
The graph of (horizontal and vertical scales differ). It climbs steeply, crosses the -axis at , peaks at and then sinks slowly towards 0 without reaching it. Knowing only that is a local maximum would say that beats the values near . The question says "maximum", and the sign of on the whole domain is what lets us compare with values far away, such as or .Theorem 1, Section 6.3 (Basic 3); Definition 3, Section 6.4 (Basic 4). Lesson: absolute extremaCross-check with the second derivative test
Differentiate by the quotient rule, with , , , :
At : . With , Theorem 4 (i) says is a point of local maxima, which agrees with Step 5.
This test is quick but local: it only describes near . It confirms Step 5 but could not replace it. In the last line we divided top and bottom by , which is allowed because .Second derivative test, Theorem 4, Section 6.4 (Basic 4). Lesson: derivative testsThe maximum value is
The question only asks where the maximum is, but stating the value completes the picture and lets us test the claim with numbers.
On its domain , is positive for and negative for . So increases up to and decreases after it, and for every : has its maximum at , with maximum value . (The answer key has no entry for this "show that" question.)
. Nearby and far away, is smaller: , , , . A nice by-product: means , that is , so . Indeed and .
- Stopping at . A zero derivative only makes a candidate; has and no maximum there (Remark after Theorem 2).
- Using only the second derivative test and calling the result "the maximum". That test is local; the sign of on the whole domain is what proves the value is the largest.
- Forgetting the domain and talking about , where does not exist.
- Dropping the in the quotient rule, which gives and the wrong critical point .
- " positive up to , negative after , on the whole domain" proves that is the greatest value, not just a local one.
- When the numerator of is , compare with : is increasing and .
- The maximum of at explains why .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| means ; defined for ; strictly increasing; | Steps 1, 3, 4 | Section 5.4 |
| Steps 2, 6 | Theorem 5 (2), Section 5.4 | |
| Quotient rule | Steps 2, 6 | Section 5.3, rule (3) |
| Critical point; extrema occur only at critical points | Step 3 | Theorem 2 and the Note after it, Section 6.4 |
| (or ) on gives increasing (decreasing) on , strictly | Step 5 | Theorem 1 and its proof, Section 6.3 |
| Maximum value: for all in I | Step 5 | Definition 3 (a), Section 6.4 (the inequality sign in this reprint looks like ""; it must be "", since is allowed) |
| Second derivative test | Step 6 | Theorem 4 (i), Section 6.4 |
| All decimal values | Step 7, Check | Recomputed in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →