Exercise 6.2 · Q15: is increasing on any interval disjoint from
15. Let I be any interval disjoint from . Prove that the function given by is increasing on I.
Let , . Then
As I is an interval disjoint from , I lies in or in .
In , and , so .
In , and , so .
So on I, and hence is increasing on I.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
, which is positive exactly when , that is, when . An interval that does not meet cannot jump over it, so it lies entirely on one side, where at every point. Hence on I and is increasing there.
- Given
- (defined for ); I is an interval with no point in common with .
- To show
- is increasing on I: in I gives (we shall in fact get ).
- Plan
- (1) is defined on I. (2) I lies wholly in or wholly in . (3) Differentiate and factorise. (4) Sign of on I. (5) Theorem 1 on every inside I. (6) Why has to be avoided.
Basics you need
is increasing on I if in I always gives ; strictly increasing if it always gives . Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions
Theorem 1 (a) is stated for . For any interval I, apply it on for each pair in I. If throughout, the Mean Value Theorem step of its proof gives . Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions
An interval contains every number between any two of its points. Disjoint from means no point of I lies in . Basics: interval notation
is positive when the two factors on top have the same sign (the bottom is positive for ). Basics: sign of a product
Solution
is defined and differentiable on I
is defined for every . Since and I has no point in common with , . So is defined at every point of I, and it is continuous and differentiable there (a sum of and , each differentiable for ).
Before talking about increasing on I, we must know is defined on all of I. The only trouble point, , is inside , so the hypothesis keeps it out.is continuous and differentiable wherever (Section 5.2, 5.3).I lies wholly on one side of
Every point of I is outside , so or . Suppose I had a point and a point . Being an interval, I would contain every number between and , in particular , which is in . That contradicts disjointness. So
Either way, every satisfies , that is, .
This is where the word "interval" is used. A set like avoids and has points on both sides, but it is not an interval. An interval cannot skip over a gap.An interval contains everything between any two of its points. Basics: interval notationDifferentiate and factorise
Write ; the power rule gives . So
The factorised form turns "what is the sign of ?" into "what are the signs of , and ?", each easy to read.(difference of squares). Basics: factorising and the discriminantat every point of I
- If : for , and , so the top is positive.
- If : for , and , so the top (negative times negative) is positive.
The bottom is positive for . So in both cases for every .
Sign chart of (not to scale). is positive outside and negative between and (except at , where is not defined). Equivalently, and on I by Step 2. The sign chart shows the whole picture, including why the interval has to be excluded.Negative times negative is positive. Basics: sign of a productApply Theorem 1: is increasing on I
Take any in I. Because I is an interval, . On , is continuous, it is differentiable on , and there (Step 4). By Theorem 1 (a), is increasing on , so ; the Mean Value Theorem step in the proof even gives
for some between and . As in I were arbitrary, is increasing (indeed strictly increasing) on I.
This works whatever kind of interval I is: open, closed or half-open, bounded like or unbounded like . That is why the proof works with an arbitrary pair and not with end points of I.Theorem 1 (a), Section 6.3, and its proof. Lesson: increasing and decreasing functionsWhy has to be avoided
On , (sign chart), and indeed while : falls. So the statement is false for an interval such as , which meets .
(the two axes use the same scale; the curve is cut off at heights ). Outside the shaded band both branches rise from left to right; inside the band they fall, with turning points and . The hypothesis "disjoint from " is sufficient, not necessary: the same proof works on , since Theorem 1 only needs inside the interval and is continuous at . The book's condition simply guarantees everywhere on I.Points where or is undefined (, , ) split the real line into the pieces of the sign chart. Basics: sign of a product
Any interval I disjoint from lies entirely in or entirely in . There , so by Theorem 1, is increasing (in fact strictly increasing) on I. (The answer key has no entry for this proof question.)
On : , , : rising. ✓
On : , , : rising. ✓
Derivative: and . ✓
- Forgetting the case . There both factors and are negative; their product is still positive.
- Not using that I is an interval. The proof needs I to be on one side of ; that follows only because an interval cannot skip over .
- Proving it only for one specific interval, such as . The question says any interval disjoint from .
- Dropping . only makes sense for ; Step 1 shows is never in I.
- To prove "increasing on every interval of a certain kind", take an arbitrary pair in I and apply Theorem 1 on .
- Factorise and read the sign of each factor; a square in the denominator is positive wherever it is defined.
- Use exactly what the hypothesis gives: "interval" plus "disjoint from " means on all of I.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing and strictly increasing on an interval | Step 5 | Definition 1, Section 6.3 (Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions) |
| on gives increasing on | Steps 5, 6 | Theorem 1 (a), Section 6.3 |
| Step 5 | Proof of Theorem 1 (Mean Value Theorem), Section 6.3 | |
| Step 3 | Class XI, Limits and Derivatives | |
| An interval contains every number between two of its points | Steps 2, 5 | Meaning of "interval" (Class XI, Sets) |
| Difference of squares; signs of products | Steps 3, 4 | Algebra |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →