Class 12 Maths, Worked in Full Past papersGet updates
Chapter 6 · Application of Derivatives

Exercise 6.2 · Q7: log⁡(1+x)−2x2+x\log(1+x)-\frac{2x}{2+x} is increasing for x>−1x>-1

Exercise 6.2Increasing and decreasing functions · Section 6.3
The question

Show that y=log⁡(1+x)−2x2+xy = \log(1 + x) - \dfrac{2x}{2 + x}⁠, x>−1x > -1⁠, is an increasing function of xx throughout its domain.

Exam answer

y=log⁡(1+x)−2x2+xy = \log(1 + x) - \frac{2x}{2 + x}⁠, x>−1x > -1⁠. By the quotient rule,

ddx(2x2+x)=2(2+x)−2x(2+x)2=4(2+x)2\begin{aligned} &\frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{2x}{2 + x}\right) \\ &= \frac{2(2 + x) - 2x}{(2 + x)^2} = \frac{4}{(2 + x)^2} \end{aligned}

So

dydx=11+x−4(2+x)2=(2+x)2−4(1+x)(1+x)(2+x)2=x2(1+x)(2+x)2\begin{aligned} \frac{dy}{dx} &= \frac{1}{1 + x} - \frac{4}{(2 + x)^2} \\ &= \frac{(2 + x)^2 - 4(1 + x)}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2} \\ &= \frac{x^2}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2} \end{aligned}

For x>−1x > -1⁠, x2≥0x^2 \ge 0⁠, 1+x>01 + x > 0 and (2+x)2>0(2 + x)^2 > 0⁠.

So dydx≥0\frac{dy}{dx} \ge 0 for all x>−1x > -1 (zero only at x=0x = 0⁠).

Hence yy is an increasing function of xx throughout its domain.

Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?

The one idea this problem is built on

The two pieces look unrelated, but their derivatives combine over a common denominator into something very tidy:

dydx=x2(1+x)(2+x)2.\frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{x^2}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2}.

For x>−1x > -1 the top is a square (never negative) and the bottom is positive, so the slope is never negative. That is exactly what Theorem 1 needs for "increasing".

Given, to find, and the plan
Given
y=log⁡(1+x)−2x2+xy = \log(1 + x) - \dfrac{2x}{2 + x} for x>−1x > -1 (log⁡\log is the natural logarithm, as throughout the book).
To show
yy is increasing on its domain (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠: x1<x2⇒y(x1)≤y(x2)x_1 < x_2 \Rightarrow y(x_1) \le y(x_2)⁠.
Plan
(1) Confirm the domain. (2) Differentiate each piece (chain rule, quotient rule). (3) Combine into one fraction and simplify. (4) Sign of each factor for x>−1x > -1⁠. (5) Theorem 1, and the stronger strict statement.

Basics you need

1Increasing (Definition 1)

On an interval I, ff is increasing if x1<x2x_1 < x_2 in I gives f(x1)≤f(x2)f(x_1) \le f(x_2)⁠, and strictly increasing if it gives f(x1)<f(x2)f(x_1) < f(x_2)⁠. Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions

2Derivative of log⁡\log and the chain rule

ddt(log⁡t)=1t\frac{d}{dt}(\log t) = \frac1t for t>0t > 0 (Theorem 5, Section 5.4). With the inner function t=1+xt = 1 + x⁠, the chain rule gives ddxlog⁡(1+x)=11+x⋅1\frac{d}{dx}\log(1 + x) = \frac{1}{1 + x}\cdot 1⁠. Basics: the chain rule

3Quotient rule

(uv)′=u′v−uv′v2\left(\frac{u}{v}\right)' = \frac{u'v - uv'}{v^2} wherever v≠0v \ne 0 (Section 5.3).

4Theorem 1 (a)

If ff is continuous on [a,b][a, b]⁠, differentiable on (a,b)(a, b)⁠, and f′(x)≥0f'(x) \ge 0 for each xx in (a,b)(a, b)⁠, then ff is increasing on [a,b][a, b]⁠. Its proof shows f′>0f' > 0 gives strictly increasing.

5Sign of a fraction

A fraction is positive when top and bottom have the same sign; a square is never negative. Basics: sign of a product

Solution

  1. The domain is exactly x>−1x > -1

    log⁡(1+x)\log(1 + x) needs 1+x>01 + x > 0⁠, that is x>−1x > -1⁠. The fraction needs 2+x≠02 + x \ne 0⁠; for x>−1x > -1 we have 2+x>1>02 + x > 1 > 0⁠, so this is automatic. So the domain is the interval (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠, and on it yy is differentiable (hence continuous).

    "Throughout its domain" means on the whole interval (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠. Knowing that 1+x>01 + x > 0 and 2+x>02 + x > 0 there is also what will settle the sign of the derivative in Step 4.
    The logarithm is defined only for positive numbers (Section 5.4). Basics: interval notation
  2. Differentiate each piece

    First piece, chain rule with inner function 1+x1 + x⁠:

    ddxlog⁡(1+x)=11+x.\frac{d}{dx}\log(1 + x) = \frac{1}{1 + x}.

    Second piece, quotient rule with u=2xu = 2x⁠, v=2+xv = 2 + x⁠, u′=2u' = 2⁠, v′=1v' = 1⁠:

    ddx(2x2+x)=2(2+x)−2x⋅1(2+x)2=4(2+x)2.\begin{aligned} \frac{d}{dx}\left(\frac{2x}{2 + x}\right) &= \frac{2(2 + x) - 2x\cdot 1}{(2 + x)^2}\\ &= \frac{4}{(2 + x)^2}. \end{aligned}
    In the quotient rule the 2x2x terms cancel, leaving the constant 4 on top. That cancellation is what makes the final answer so clean.
    Quotient rule: u′v−uv′v2\frac{u'v - uv'}{v^2}⁠; the order in the numerator matters. Basics: the chain rule
  3. Combine over a common denominator

    dydx=11+x−4(2+x)2=(2+x)2−4(1+x)(1+x)(2+x)2=4+4x+x2−4−4x(1+x)(2+x)2=x2(1+x)(2+x)2.\begin{aligned} \frac{dy}{dx} &= \frac{1}{1 + x} - \frac{4}{(2 + x)^2}\\ &= \frac{(2 + x)^2 - 4(1 + x)}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2}\\ &= \frac{4 + 4x + x^2 - 4 - 4x}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2}\\ &= \frac{x^2}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2}. \end{aligned}
    To compare the two terms we need one fraction. The common denominator is (1+x)(2+x)2(1 + x)(2 + x)^2⁠. Expanding (2+x)2=4+4x+x2(2 + x)^2 = 4 + 4x + x^2⁠, the constants and the xx terms cancel, leaving just x2x^2⁠.
    (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2(a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2⁠, so (2+x)2=4+4x+x2(2 + x)^2 = 4 + 4x + x^2⁠.
  4. Sign of the derivative for x>−1x > -1

    • Top: x2≥0x^2 \ge 0⁠, and x2=0x^2 = 0 only at x=0x = 0⁠.
    • Bottom: 1+x>01 + x > 0 and (2+x)2>0(2 + x)^2 > 0 (Step 1), so the bottom is positive.

    Hence

    dydx≥0 for all x>−1,\frac{dy}{dx} \ge 0 \text{ for all } x > -1,

    with dydx=0\frac{dy}{dx} = 0 only at x=0x = 0 and dydx>0\frac{dy}{dx} > 0 everywhere else in the domain.

    x 0 −1 x² + + 0 1 + x + + (2 + x)² + + dy/dx + + 0 y increasing increasing
    Sign chart on the domain x>−1x > -1 (open circle: −1-1 is not in the domain; not to scale). Every factor is positive except x2x^2⁠, which is 0 at x=0x = 0 and positive on both sides.
    The single zero of the derivative does not change its sign: it comes from a square. So there is no turning point, only a momentary flat spot at x=0x = 0⁠.
    Positive over positive is positive; a square is never negative. Basics: sign of a product
  5. Conclude with Theorem 1

    Take any x1<x2x_1 < x_2 in (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠. On [x1,x2][x_1, x_2]⁠, yy is continuous, it is differentiable on (x1,x2)(x_1, x_2)⁠, and dydx≥0\frac{dy}{dx} \ge 0 there. By Theorem 1 (a), yy is increasing on [x1,x2][x_1, x_2]⁠, so y(x1)≤y(x2)y(x_1) \le y(x_2)⁠. As x1<x2x_1 < x_2 were arbitrary, yy is an increasing function of xx throughout its domain.

    x y −1 1 2 3 4 −0.6 −0.3 0.3 x = −1 (0, 0): slope 0
    y=log⁡(1+x)−2x2+xy = \log(1 + x) - \frac{2x}{2 + x} for x>−1x > -1⁠: rising everywhere, with a momentary flat spot (slope 0) at the origin. As x→−1+x \to -1^{+}⁠, yy falls without bound.
    The theorem is stated on a closed interval, while the domain is the open, unbounded interval (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠. Applying it on [x1,x2][x_1, x_2] for every pair inside the domain covers the whole domain.
  6. Stronger: yy is strictly increasing

    On (−1,0)(-1, 0) and on (0,∞)(0, \infty) the derivative is strictly positive. Since yy is continuous at 0, the proof of Theorem 1 on [x1,x2][x_1, x_2] gives strict increase on (−1,0](-1, 0] and on [0,∞)[0, \infty)⁠. For a pair on opposite sides, x1<0<x2x_1 < 0 < x_2⁠, we get y(x1)<y(0)<y(x2)y(x_1) < y(0) < y(x_2)⁠. So yy is in fact strictly increasing on (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠.

    The question only asks for "increasing", which Step 5 proved. This step shows that the flat spot at x=0x = 0 does not even produce two equal values.
Result

dydx=x2(1+x)(2+x)2≥0\dfrac{dy}{dx} = \dfrac{x^2}{(1 + x)(2 + x)^2} \ge 0 for every x>−1x > -1 (zero only at x=0x = 0⁠). By Theorem 1, yy is increasing throughout its domain (−1,∞)(-1, \infty)⁠; in fact strictly increasing. (The answer key gives no answer for this "show that" question.)

Check it with numbers

y(−0.9)≈−0.666221y(-0.9) \approx -0.666221⁠, y(−0.5)≈−0.026481y(-0.5) \approx -0.026481⁠, y(0)=0y(0) = 0⁠, y(1)=log⁡2−23≈0.026481y(1) = \log 2 - \frac23 \approx 0.026481⁠, y(3)=log⁡4−1.2≈0.186294y(3) = \log 4 - 1.2 \approx 0.186294⁠: rising throughout. Slope at x=1x = 1⁠: the formula gives 12⋅9=118≈0.055556\frac{1}{2\cdot 9} = \frac{1}{18} \approx 0.055556⁠, and the central difference y(1.001)−y(0.999)0.002\frac{y(1.001) - y(0.999)}{0.002} is also about 0.0555560.055556⁠.

Common mistakes
  1. Quotient rule in the wrong order, uv′−u′vv2\frac{uv' - u'v}{v^2}⁠. That gives −4(2+x)2-\frac{4}{(2 + x)^2} and the wrong final sign.
  2. Stopping at 11+x−4(2+x)2\frac{1}{1 + x} - \frac{4}{(2 + x)^2}⁠. The sign of a difference is not obvious; combine into one fraction first.
  3. Thinking dydx=0\frac{dy}{dx} = 0 at x=0x = 0 spoils "increasing". Theorem 1 (a) needs only dydx≥0\frac{dy}{dx} \ge 0⁠, and Step 6 shows even strict increase survives.
  4. Ignoring the domain. The positivity of 1+x1 + x comes from x>−1x > -1⁠; for x<−1x < -1 the function is not even defined.
What to take away
  1. Combine derivative terms into a single fraction before judging the sign.
  2. Use the domain: here x>−1x > -1 makes every factor of the denominator positive.
  3. A derivative that vanishes at an isolated point without changing sign still gives an increasing (even strictly increasing) function.

Every fact used, and where it comes from

FactUsed inSource
Increasing and strictly increasingSteps 5, 6Definition 1 (i), (iv), Section 6.3 (Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions)
log⁡t\log t defined for t>0t > 0⁠; ddtlog⁡t=1t\frac{d}{dt}\log t = \frac1tSteps 1, 2Section 5.4; Theorem 5 (2)
Chain ruleStep 2Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1
Quotient ruleStep 2Algebra of derivatives, rule (3), Section 5.3
f′≥0f' \ge 0 on (a,b)(a, b) gives increasing on [a,b][a, b]⁠; strict version from the proofSteps 5, 6Theorem 1 (a) and its proof, Section 6.3
Found an error, or want more?

Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →