Exercise 6.2 · Q7: is increasing for
Show that , , is an increasing function of throughout its domain.
, . By the quotient rule,
So
For , , and .
So for all (zero only at ).
Hence is an increasing function of throughout its domain.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The two pieces look unrelated, but their derivatives combine over a common denominator into something very tidy:
For the top is a square (never negative) and the bottom is positive, so the slope is never negative. That is exactly what Theorem 1 needs for "increasing".
- Given
- for ( is the natural logarithm, as throughout the book).
- To show
- is increasing on its domain : .
- Plan
- (1) Confirm the domain. (2) Differentiate each piece (chain rule, quotient rule). (3) Combine into one fraction and simplify. (4) Sign of each factor for . (5) Theorem 1, and the stronger strict statement.
Basics you need
On an interval I, is increasing if in I gives , and strictly increasing if it gives . Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions
for (Theorem 5, Section 5.4). With the inner function , the chain rule gives . Basics: the chain rule
wherever (Section 5.3).
If is continuous on , differentiable on , and for each in , then is increasing on . Its proof shows gives strictly increasing.
A fraction is positive when top and bottom have the same sign; a square is never negative. Basics: sign of a product
Solution
The domain is exactly
needs , that is . The fraction needs ; for we have , so this is automatic. So the domain is the interval , and on it is differentiable (hence continuous).
"Throughout its domain" means on the whole interval . Knowing that and there is also what will settle the sign of the derivative in Step 4.The logarithm is defined only for positive numbers (Section 5.4). Basics: interval notationDifferentiate each piece
First piece, chain rule with inner function :
Second piece, quotient rule with , , , :
In the quotient rule the terms cancel, leaving the constant 4 on top. That cancellation is what makes the final answer so clean.Quotient rule: ; the order in the numerator matters. Basics: the chain ruleCombine over a common denominator
To compare the two terms we need one fraction. The common denominator is . Expanding , the constants and the terms cancel, leaving just ., so .Sign of the derivative for
- Top: , and only at .
- Bottom: and (Step 1), so the bottom is positive.
Hence
with only at and everywhere else in the domain.
Sign chart on the domain (open circle: is not in the domain; not to scale). Every factor is positive except , which is 0 at and positive on both sides. The single zero of the derivative does not change its sign: it comes from a square. So there is no turning point, only a momentary flat spot at .Positive over positive is positive; a square is never negative. Basics: sign of a productConclude with Theorem 1
Take any in . On , is continuous, it is differentiable on , and there. By Theorem 1 (a), is increasing on , so . As were arbitrary, is an increasing function of throughout its domain.
for : rising everywhere, with a momentary flat spot (slope 0) at the origin. As , falls without bound. The theorem is stated on a closed interval, while the domain is the open, unbounded interval . Applying it on for every pair inside the domain covers the whole domain.Stronger: is strictly increasing
On and on the derivative is strictly positive. Since is continuous at 0, the proof of Theorem 1 on gives strict increase on and on . For a pair on opposite sides, , we get . So is in fact strictly increasing on .
The question only asks for "increasing", which Step 5 proved. This step shows that the flat spot at does not even produce two equal values.
for every (zero only at ). By Theorem 1, is increasing throughout its domain ; in fact strictly increasing. (The answer key gives no answer for this "show that" question.)
, , , , : rising throughout. Slope at : the formula gives , and the central difference is also about .
- Quotient rule in the wrong order, . That gives and the wrong final sign.
- Stopping at . The sign of a difference is not obvious; combine into one fraction first.
- Thinking at spoils "increasing". Theorem 1 (a) needs only , and Step 6 shows even strict increase survives.
- Ignoring the domain. The positivity of comes from ; for the function is not even defined.
- Combine derivative terms into a single fraction before judging the sign.
- Use the domain: here makes every factor of the denominator positive.
- A derivative that vanishes at an isolated point without changing sign still gives an increasing (even strictly increasing) function.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Increasing and strictly increasing | Steps 5, 6 | Definition 1 (i), (iv), Section 6.3 (Lesson: increasing and decreasing functions) |
| defined for ; | Steps 1, 2 | Section 5.4; Theorem 5 (2) |
| Chain rule | Step 2 | Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Quotient rule | Step 2 | Algebra of derivatives, rule (3), Section 5.3 |
| on gives increasing on ; strict version from the proof | Steps 5, 6 | Theorem 1 (a) and its proof, Section 6.3 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →