Example 2: Continuity of at
Examine whether the function given by is continuous at .
Since , is continuous at .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
To test continuity at 0 we compare three numbers: , the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit. Squaring wipes out the sign of , so whether is a small negative or a small positive number, is a very small positive number. Both sides therefore squeeze down to 0, which is exactly .
- Given
- for every real .
- To find
- Whether is continuous at .
- Plan
- Check that 0 is in the domain and find . Compute the left-hand and right-hand limits at 0 separately. Compare the three numbers (Definition 1, Section 5.2).
Basics you need
means can be made as close to as we like by taking close enough to (with ). Basics: what a limit is
: approaches 0 through negative numbers. : through positive numbers. The limit at 0 exists exactly when both one-sided limits exist and agree. Basics: left-hand and right-hand limits
If and , then . With this gives . It holds for one-sided limits too. Basics: limits
For in the domain: is continuous at when the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit and all exist and are equal, that is . Lesson: continuity at a point
Solution
Is 0 in the domain? Find
can be computed for every real , so the domain is and 0 belongs to it:
Continuity is only tested at points of the domain (Definition 1), and is one of the three numbers to compare..Left-hand limit at 0
For the rule is still . By the product rule for limits (Basic 3),
side of 0 left left left Even though is negative here, is positive: a negative times a negative is positive. So the graph comes down to height 0 from the left (it does not come up from below). The values 0.01, 0.0001, 0.000001 shrink towards 0.Right-hand limit at 0
side of 0 right right right The right side gives exactly the same values as the left, because : the graph is symmetric about the -axis. Both one-sided limits are 0, so .How close, exactly?
The distance of from 0 is . If , then
In general, to get within any small positive number of 0, take .
This turns the pattern in the tables into a guarantee: is as close to 0 as anyone asks, from either side, once is close enough to 0. That is precisely what "the limit is 0" means (Basic 1).Compare the three numbers
All three exist and are equal, so . By Definition 1, is continuous at .
"Limit equals value" is the whole of Definition 1. The textbook writes this as .
and both one-sided limits at 0 are 0, so : is continuous at . This agrees with the textbook's solution.
and both give , which is less than , as Step 4 promises for every .
- Giving a negative left-hand value. is , not . Use brackets when squaring a negative number.
- Reading "" as " is negative, so is negative". The minus sign in describes where comes from, not the sign of .
- Only checking . Being defined at 0 is just one of the three conditions; the limits must also be computed and compared.
- The continuity test at a point: left-hand limit, right-hand limit and value must all exist and agree.
- Nothing here was special to 0: for every , so is continuous everywhere (a case of Example 14, every polynomial is continuous).
- When a single formula is used on both sides of , the two one-sided limits are computed the same way; they can differ only when the formula changes at .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| is defined for all real | Step 1 | Arithmetic |
| ; | Steps 2, 3 | Algebra of limits, Class XI (Limits and Derivatives) (Basics: limits) |
| Steps 2, 3 | Product of two negatives is positive | |
| Step 4 | Inequalities of non-negative numbers | |
| Continuous at iff | Step 5 | Definition 1, Section 5.2 (Lesson: continuity at a point) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →