Exercise 5.1 · Q18: and : continuity at and
18. For what value of is the function defined by
continuous at ? What about continuity at ?
(i) At : .
Since for every , there is no value of for which is continuous at .
(ii) At : .
, so is continuous at for every value of .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The left piece is zero at whatever is: changing stretches that piece up or down, but a stretch of height is still . The right piece starts at height . So at there is always a jump from to , and no choice of can close it. At , by contrast, plays no part at all: near the function is just .
- Given
- The two-piece function above, with an unknown real constant .
- To find
- (i) The values of , if any, for which is continuous at . (ii) Whether is continuous at .
- Plan
- Part (i): compute , the left-hand limit and the right-hand limit at , each separately, and see whether any makes them equal. Part (ii): note which rule governs the points near , and compute the same three numbers there.
Basics you need
is continuous at (a point of its domain) when the left-hand limit, the right-hand limit and all exist and are equal (Definition 1, Section 5.2). Basics: what a limit is
Left of : ; right of : ; in both, and . Basics: left-hand and right-hand limits
The input satisfies "", so uses . Inputs just right of , and all inputs near , satisfy "" and use . Basics: piecewise functions
for every real . This is the whole reason no works in Part (i).
Part (i): continuity at
is in the domain; find
Every real satisfies exactly one of "" and "", so is defined on all of . Since , the first rule gives
This is for every value of .
The value at the junction comes from the line whose condition contains the junction, here "". The constant multiplies a bracket that vanishes at , so it cannot affect .Reading a piecewise rule: the condition decides the formula. Basics: piecewise functionsThe left-hand limit at
Put with , . Then , so the first rule applies. Since and ,
As , , so
Take care with the signs: squaring removes the minus, but at becomes . Either way both terms shrink to , and multiplying by the fixed number keeps the limit at .The right-hand limit at
Put with , . Now , so the second rule applies:
Points just to the right of are governed by , which heads for height . The value is irrelevant to this limit: a limit never looks at the point itself.Compare: no can work
From the three steps above:
Continuity at would need , which is false. None of the three numbers involves , so the failure happens for every value of . Hence there is no value of for which is continuous at .
The question "for what value of " invites us to solve an equation in . But the equation we get, , has no in it and is never true, so the honest answer is "none". (The left-hand limit does equal , so is continuous from the left at ; it is the right side that jumps.)A jump (left-hand limit right-hand limit) is a discontinuity, whatever the value at the point. Lesson: continuity at a point
Part (ii): continuity at
Which rule governs the points near ?
is in the domain and , so
Moreover every with satisfies , so on the whole open interval around we have . The rule containing is used only for , at distance at least from the point .
A limit at only uses values of at points as close to as we like. Once we stay within distance of the point, the -rule never appears, so cannot influence continuity at .Continuity is a local property: it depends only on the function near the point. Basics: what a limit isThe two one-sided limits at
Take , so that and are both in :
The restriction guarantees , so the left-hand points really are governed by . Since , only small matter anyway.One-sided limits computed with . Basics: left-hand and right-hand limitsCompare
Left-hand limit , right-hand limit , . All three agree, so is continuous at for every value of .
This is Definition 1 applied directly. Equivalently: near , coincides with the polynomial , and polynomials are continuous (Example 14).Polynomials are continuous at every real number. Lesson: continuity at a point
(i) For every : but . So there is no value of for which is continuous at .
(ii) is continuous at for every value of (all three numbers equal ).
(Textbook answer: For no value of , is continuous at but is continuous at for any value of .)
Take . At : , , . The left side approaches , the right side stays near . ✓ (jump)
Take : , still heading to as shrinks further (), while . A huge only slows the approach; it cannot change the limit . ✓
At , for any : , , . ✓
- Writing and "solving" for . The equation has no solution; dividing by is not allowed.
- Sign error in the left-hand limit. At , , not . (Both tend to , but the habit matters in other questions.)
- Using for . The point belongs to "", so , not . The final answer happens to survive this slip, but the value at the point is wrong, and a solution that states a wrong value is not a correct solution.
- Thinking matters at . Near only the rule is used; continuity depends only on values near the point.
- "For what value of the constant" can have the answer "none". Show it by computing the three numbers and seeing that the equation they force is impossible.
- A constant that multiplies a factor vanishing at the junction cannot help close a gap there.
- Away from the junctions, a piecewise function is continuous wherever its local formula is (here, a polynomial).
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Continuity at : one-sided limits and equal | Part (i), Step 4; Part (ii), Step 3 | Definition 1, Section 5.2 (Lesson: continuity at a point) |
| Choosing the rule of a piecewise function | Part (i), Steps 1–3; Part (ii), Step 1 | Definition of (compare Examples 10 and 13) |
| Limits of polynomials in ; | Part (i), Steps 2, 3; Part (ii), Step 2 | Algebra of limits, Class XI, Chapter 12 (Limits and Derivatives) |
| Polynomials are continuous | Part (ii), Step 3 | Example 14, Section 5.2 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →