Miscellaneous · Q6 (MCQ): Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive: how many?
Let . Then number of relations containing and which are reflexive and symmetric but not transitive is
(A) 1 (B) 2 (C) 3 (D) 4
A reflexive, symmetric relation containing must contain
is not transitive: but . The only pairs not in are and . By symmetry both are added or neither, and adding both gives , which is transitive.
So only qualifies.
Answer: (A) 1
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The conditions force most of the relation. Reflexive forces the three pairs , and symmetric forces the reverses and of the two given pairs. That already fixes 7 of the 9 pairs in . Only and are left undecided, and symmetry says they must be taken together or not at all. So there are just two candidates, and we test each for transitivity.
- Given
- , so has ordered pairs. The relation must contain and , be reflexive and symmetric, and not be transitive.
- To find
- How many such relations there are.
- Plan
- (1) List the pairs every such relation must contain. (2) List the pairs still free, and the ways symmetry allows us to fill them. (3) Test each candidate for transitivity. (4) Confirm every possibility was counted exactly once. (5) Check each option.
Basics you need
A relation on is any subset of . For , has 9 pairs, so there are relations in all: each pair is either in or out. Basics: what a relation is
Reflexive: for every . Symmetric: . Transitive: . Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitive
To show a relation is not transitive, find specific and in with . Basics: proving and disproving
If every object falls into exactly one of a list of cases, the total is the sum of the counts in the cases. Here the cases are the ways of filling the undecided pairs. Basics: counting choices
Solution
The pairs every such relation must contain
Let be any relation with all the required properties.
- Given: and .
- Reflexive: .
- Symmetric, applied to the given pairs: and .
So every qualifying contains the 7 pairs
Starting from the forced pairs shrinks the search from 512 relations to a handful. Each of the 7 pairs is forced by one stated condition, so no qualifying relation can leave any of them out.Reflexive and symmetric are both "must contain" conditions: they add pairs. Transitive is also a "must contain" condition, which is why "not transitive" is the condition that limits how much we may add. Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitiveOnly two pairs are left, and symmetry pairs them
has 9 pairs and has 7, so the undecided pairs are and . There are ways to decide them:
Add to Symmetric? nothing yes (checked in Step 3) only no: in, out only no: in, out both yes: this is all of So exactly two relations are reflexive, symmetric and contain and : and .
Any qualifying relation equals plus some choice of the free pairs, and the four rows above are all the possible choices, with no overlap. Symmetry removes the two middle rows, because each contains a pair without its reverse.With 2 free pairs, each in or out, there are choices (multiplication principle). Basics: counting choicesCandidate : reflexive, symmetric, not transitive
Reflexive: . Symmetric: the non-loop pairs come in reverse pairs, with and with , and each loop is its own reverse. Not transitive:
So has every required property, and it counts.
Each circle is an element of ; a small violet loop is a pair , and a blue line joining and stands for both and . Left: . The path exists but the short cut does not, so is not transitive. Right: adding the line 2–3 gives , in which every short cut exists. For "not transitive" one failing chain is enough (Basic 3). The chain goes through 1, because 1 is the only element joined to both 2 and 3. A second failing chain, with , also exists, but one is all we need.Transitive fails when some are in but is not (Definition 3(iii)).Candidate : transitive, so rejected
contains every pair of . So whenever and are in , the pair is in as well, because every pair is. Hence is transitive, and it does not meet the requirement "not transitive".
The universal relation is transitive (indeed an equivalence relation), so it must be excluded. Missing this is the main way to get the wrong answer (B).The universal relation (Definition 2) is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.Count: every possibility exactly once
Every relation that meets the conditions must contain (Step 1), so it is one of the four relations in the table of Step 2. Two of those are not symmetric, and is transitive. Only remains, and Step 3 showed it qualifies. The four rows are different relations, so nothing is counted twice. Hence the number of such relations is 1.
An exact count needs two halves: no qualifying relation is missed (Step 1 shows every one has the form plus free pairs, and Step 2 lists all such forms) and nothing is counted wrongly (each candidate was checked against every condition). This is the same method the textbook uses in Example 23.Check every option
Option Verdict Why (A) 1 correct Only is reflexive, symmetric, contains and is not transitive. (B) 2 wrong Counts both reflexive symmetric candidates, and , forgetting that is transitive. (C) 3 wrong Would need a third candidate, but after the 7 forced pairs only the 4 fillings of Step 2 exist, and 3 of them fail a condition. (D) 4 wrong Counts all 4 fillings of , ignoring both symmetry and the "not transitive" condition. An MCQ answer is safest when every wrong option is explained. The count 1 came from a complete list, so any other number is impossible, and each wrong option matches a specific skipped condition.
The only relation on containing and that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive is , made of the three loops , , and the four pairs , , , . The answer is (A) 1. (Textbook answer: A.)
Relation Builder, in the chapter’s Games tab. Level 2 is this question. Play Relation Builder ↗
The site's verification script lists all relations on and tests each one. Of the that contain and , exactly 2 are reflexive and symmetric ( and ), and exactly 1 of those is not transitive: . The brute force agrees with the argument.
- Forgetting the forced reverse pairs and . Without them the relation is not symmetric.
- Counting . It is reflexive and symmetric but also transitive, so it fails "not transitive".
- Adding only one of . That breaks symmetry.
- Proving "not transitive" with a chain that is not in . Both links, and , must be pairs of .
- For counting relations with properties: first write down everything forced, then list the few free choices, then test each.
- Symmetry makes pairs behave as one unit.
- The universal relation is transitive; it is always worth checking whether it sneaks into a count.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| A relation on is a subset of | Steps 1, 2 | Section 1.2, opening paragraph |
| Universal relation | Step 4 | Definition 2, Section 1.2 |
| Reflexive, symmetric, transitive | Steps 1–5 | Definition 3, Section 1.2 (Lesson: types of relations) |
| Method: forced pairs, then free pairs | Steps 1–5 | Example 23, Miscellaneous Examples (Lesson: counting functions and relations) |
| Counts 512, 128, 2, 1 | Check | Brute force over all relations in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →