Class 12 Maths, Worked in Full Past papersGet updates
Chapter 1 · Relations and Functions

Miscellaneous · Q6 (MCQ): Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive: how many?

Miscellaneous ExerciseCounting relations · Miscellaneous Exercise
The question

Let A={1,2,3}A = \{1, 2, 3\}⁠. Then number of relations containing (1,2)(1, 2) and (1,3)(1, 3) which are reflexive and symmetric but not transitive is

(A) 1    (B) 2    (C) 3    (D) 4

Exam answer

A reflexive, symmetric relation containing (1,2),(1,3)(1, 2), (1, 3) must contain

R1={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,1),(1,3),(3,1)}.\begin{aligned} R_1 = \{&(1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), \\ &(1, 2), (2, 1), \\ &(1, 3), (3, 1)\}. \end{aligned}

R1R_1 is not transitive: (2,1),(1,3)∈R1(2, 1), (1, 3) \in R_1 but (2,3)∉R1(2, 3) \notin R_1⁠. The only pairs not in R1R_1 are (2,3)(2, 3) and (3,2)(3, 2)⁠. By symmetry both are added or neither, and adding both gives A×AA \times A⁠, which is transitive.

So only R1R_1 qualifies.

Answer: (A) 1

Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?

The one idea this problem is built on

The conditions force most of the relation. Reflexive forces the three pairs (a,a)(a,a)⁠, and symmetric forces the reverses (2,1)(2,1) and (3,1)(3,1) of the two given pairs. That already fixes 7 of the 9 pairs in A×AA \times A⁠. Only (2,3)(2,3) and (3,2)(3,2) are left undecided, and symmetry says they must be taken together or not at all. So there are just two candidates, and we test each for transitivity.

Given, to find, and the plan
Given
A={1,2,3}A = \{1,2,3\}⁠, so A×AA \times A has 3×3=93 \times 3 = 9 ordered pairs. The relation must contain (1,2)(1,2) and (1,3)(1,3)⁠, be reflexive and symmetric, and not be transitive.
To find
How many such relations there are.
Plan
(1) List the pairs every such relation must contain. (2) List the pairs still free, and the ways symmetry allows us to fill them. (3) Test each candidate for transitivity. (4) Confirm every possibility was counted exactly once. (5) Check each option.

Basics you need

1Relations on a finite set

A relation on AA is any subset of A×AA \times A⁠. For A={1,2,3}A = \{1,2,3\}⁠, A×AA \times A has 9 pairs, so there are 29=5122^9 = 512 relations in all: each pair is either in or out. Basics: what a relation is

2Reflexive, symmetric, transitive

Reflexive: (a,a)∈R(a,a)\in R for every a∈Aa\in A⁠. Symmetric: (a,b)∈R⇒(b,a)∈R(a,b)\in R \Rightarrow (b,a)\in R⁠. Transitive: (a,b),(b,c)∈R⇒(a,c)∈R(a,b), (b,c)\in R \Rightarrow (a,c)\in R⁠. Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitive

3"Not transitive" needs one witness

To show a relation is not transitive, find specific (a,b)(a,b) and (b,c)(b,c) in RR with (a,c)∉R(a,c)\notin R⁠. Basics: proving and disproving

4Counting by cases

If every object falls into exactly one of a list of cases, the total is the sum of the counts in the cases. Here the cases are the ways of filling the undecided pairs. Basics: counting choices

Solution

  1. The pairs every such relation must contain

    Let RR be any relation with all the required properties.

    • Given: (1,2)∈R(1,2) \in R and (1,3)∈R(1,3) \in R⁠.
    • Reflexive: (1,1),(2,2),(3,3)∈R(1,1), (2,2), (3,3) \in R⁠.
    • Symmetric, applied to the given pairs: (2,1)∈R(2,1) \in R and (3,1)∈R(3,1) \in R⁠.

    So every qualifying RR contains the 7 pairs

    R1={(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,1),(1,3),(3,1)}.\begin{aligned} R_1 = \{&(1,1), (2,2), (3,3),\\ &(1,2), (2,1), (1,3), (3,1)\}. \end{aligned}
    Starting from the forced pairs shrinks the search from 512 relations to a handful. Each of the 7 pairs is forced by one stated condition, so no qualifying relation can leave any of them out.
    Reflexive and symmetric are both "must contain" conditions: they add pairs. Transitive is also a "must contain" condition, which is why "not transitive" is the condition that limits how much we may add. Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitive
  2. Only two pairs are left, and symmetry pairs them

    A×AA \times A has 9 pairs and R1R_1 has 7, so the undecided pairs are (2,3)(2,3) and (3,2)(3,2)⁠. There are 2×2=42 \times 2 = 4 ways to decide them:

    Add to R1R_1Symmetric?
    nothingyes (checked in Step 3)
    (2,3)(2,3) onlyno: (2,3)(2,3) in, (3,2)(3,2) out
    (3,2)(3,2) onlyno: (3,2)(3,2) in, (2,3)(2,3) out
    bothyes: this is all of A×AA \times A

    So exactly two relations are reflexive, symmetric and contain (1,2)(1,2) and (1,3)(1,3)⁠: R1R_1 and R2=A×AR_2 = A \times A⁠.

    Any qualifying relation equals R1R_1 plus some choice of the free pairs, and the four rows above are all the possible choices, with no overlap. Symmetry removes the two middle rows, because each contains a pair without its reverse.
    With 2 free pairs, each in or out, there are 22=42^2 = 4 choices (multiplication principle). Basics: counting choices
  3. Candidate R1R_1⁠: reflexive, symmetric, not transitive

    Reflexive: (1,1),(2,2),(3,3)∈R1(1,1), (2,2), (3,3) \in R_1⁠. Symmetric: the non-loop pairs come in reverse pairs, (1,2)(1,2) with (2,1)(2,1) and (1,3)(1,3) with (3,1)(3,1)⁠, and each loop (a,a)(a,a) is its own reverse. Not transitive:

    (2,1)∈R1 and (1,3)∈R1,but (2,3)∉R1.\begin{aligned} &(2,1) \in R_1 \ \text{and}\ (1,3) \in R_1,\\ &\text{but}\ (2,3) \notin R_1. \end{aligned}

    So R1R_1 has every required property, and it counts.

    (2, 3), (3, 2) left out123Option 1: leave both outnot transitive: (2,1), (1,3) but no (2,3) 123Option 2: put both inthis is A × A: transitive, so rejected
    Each circle is an element of AA⁠; a small violet loop is a pair (a,a)(a,a)⁠, and a blue line joining aa and bb stands for both (a,b)(a,b) and (b,a)(b,a)⁠. Left: R1R_1⁠. The path 2→1→32 \to 1 \to 3 exists but the short cut 2→32 \to 3 does not, so R1R_1 is not transitive. Right: adding the line 2–3 gives A×AA \times A⁠, in which every short cut exists.
    For "not transitive" one failing chain is enough (Basic 3). The chain goes through 1, because 1 is the only element joined to both 2 and 3. A second failing chain, (3,1),(1,2)(3,1), (1,2) with (3,2)∉R1(3,2) \notin R_1⁠, also exists, but one is all we need.
    Transitive fails when some (a,b),(b,c)(a,b), (b,c) are in RR but (a,c)(a,c) is not (Definition 3(iii)).
  4. Candidate R2=A×AR_2 = A \times A⁠: transitive, so rejected

    R2R_2 contains every pair of A×AA \times A⁠. So whenever (a,b)(a,b) and (b,c)(b,c) are in R2R_2⁠, the pair (a,c)(a,c) is in R2R_2 as well, because every pair is. Hence R2R_2 is transitive, and it does not meet the requirement "not transitive".

    The universal relation is transitive (indeed an equivalence relation), so it must be excluded. Missing this is the main way to get the wrong answer (B).
    The universal relation A×AA \times A (Definition 2) is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
  5. Count: every possibility exactly once

    Every relation that meets the conditions must contain R1R_1 (Step 1), so it is one of the four relations in the table of Step 2. Two of those are not symmetric, and A×AA \times A is transitive. Only R1R_1 remains, and Step 3 showed it qualifies. The four rows are different relations, so nothing is counted twice. Hence the number of such relations is 1.

    An exact count needs two halves: no qualifying relation is missed (Step 1 shows every one has the form R1R_1 plus free pairs, and Step 2 lists all such forms) and nothing is counted wrongly (each candidate was checked against every condition). This is the same method the textbook uses in Example 23.
  6. Check every option

    OptionVerdictWhy
    (A) 1correctOnly R1R_1 is reflexive, symmetric, contains (1,2),(1,3)(1,2),(1,3) and is not transitive.
    (B) 2wrongCounts both reflexive symmetric candidates, R1R_1 and A×AA \times A⁠, forgetting that A×AA \times A is transitive.
    (C) 3wrongWould need a third candidate, but after the 7 forced pairs only the 4 fillings of Step 2 exist, and 3 of them fail a condition.
    (D) 4wrongCounts all 4 fillings of (2,3),(3,2)(2,3),(3,2)⁠, ignoring both symmetry and the "not transitive" condition.
    An MCQ answer is safest when every wrong option is explained. The count 1 came from a complete list, so any other number is impossible, and each wrong option matches a specific skipped condition.
Result

The only relation on {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\} containing (1,2)(1,2) and (1,3)(1,3) that is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive is R1R_1⁠, made of the three loops (1,1)(1,1)⁠, (2,2)(2,2)⁠, (3,3)(3,3) and the four pairs (1,2)(1,2)⁠, (2,1)(2,1)⁠, (1,3)(1,3)⁠, (3,1)(3,1)⁠. The answer is (A) 1. (Textbook answer: A.)

Play this problem

Relation Builder, in the chapter’s Games tab. Level 2 is this question. Play Relation Builder ↗

Check it with numbers

The site's verification script lists all 29=5122^9 = 512 relations on {1,2,3}\{1,2,3\} and tests each one. Of the 27=1282^7 = 128 that contain (1,2)(1,2) and (1,3)(1,3)⁠, exactly 2 are reflexive and symmetric (R1R_1 and A×AA \times A⁠), and exactly 1 of those is not transitive: R1R_1⁠. The brute force agrees with the argument.

Common mistakes
  1. Forgetting the forced reverse pairs (2,1)(2,1) and (3,1)(3,1)⁠. Without them the relation is not symmetric.
  2. Counting A×AA \times A⁠. It is reflexive and symmetric but also transitive, so it fails "not transitive".
  3. Adding only one of (2,3),(3,2)(2,3), (3,2)⁠. That breaks symmetry.
  4. Proving "not transitive" with a chain that is not in RR⁠. Both links, (2,1)(2,1) and (1,3)(1,3)⁠, must be pairs of R1R_1⁠.
What to take away
  1. For counting relations with properties: first write down everything forced, then list the few free choices, then test each.
  2. Symmetry makes pairs (a,b),(b,a)(a,b), (b,a) behave as one unit.
  3. The universal relation is transitive; it is always worth checking whether it sneaks into a count.

Every fact used, and where it comes from

FactUsed inSource
A relation on AA is a subset of A×AA \times ASteps 1, 2Section 1.2, opening paragraph
Universal relation A×AA \times AStep 4Definition 2, Section 1.2
Reflexive, symmetric, transitiveSteps 1–5Definition 3, Section 1.2 (Lesson: types of relations)
Method: forced pairs, then free pairsSteps 1–5Example 23, Miscellaneous Examples (Lesson: counting functions and relations)
Counts 512, 128, 2, 1CheckBrute force over all relations in the site's verification script
Found an error, or want more?

Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →