Class 12 Maths, Worked in Full Past papersGet updates
Chapter 1 · Relations and Functions

Exercise 1.1 · Q11: Points at the same distance from the origin

Exercise 1.1Equivalence relations · Exercise 1.1
The question

Show that the relation RR in the set AA of points in a plane given by R={(P,Q):R = \{(P, Q) : distance of the point PP from the origin is same as the distance of the point QQ from the origin}\}⁠, is an equivalence relation. Further, show that the set of all points related to a point P≠(0,0)P \ne (0, 0) is the circle passing through PP with origin as centre.

Exam answer

Let OO be the origin. Then (P,Q)∈R  ⟺  ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣(P, Q) \in R \iff |OP| = |OQ|⁠.

Reflexive: Let P∈AP \in A⁠. Then ∣OP∣=∣OP∣|OP| = |OP|⁠, so (P,P)∈R(P, P) \in R⁠. Thus RR is reflexive.

Symmetric: Let (P,Q)∈R(P, Q) \in R⁠. Then ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ|⁠, so ∣OQ∣=∣OP∣|OQ| = |OP| and (Q,P)∈R(Q, P) \in R⁠. Thus RR is symmetric.

Transitive: Let (P,Q),(Q,S)∈R(P, Q), (Q, S) \in R⁠. Then ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ| and ∣OQ∣=∣OS∣|OQ| = |OS|⁠, so ∣OP∣=∣OS∣|OP| = |OS| and (P,S)∈R(P, S) \in R⁠. Thus RR is transitive.

Hence RR is an equivalence relation.

Now let P≠(0,0)P \ne (0, 0) and ∣OP∣=r|OP| = r⁠, so r>0r > 0⁠. Then (P,Q)∈R  ⟺  ∣OQ∣=r(P, Q) \in R \iff |OQ| = r⁠, that is, QQ lies on the circle with centre OO and radius rr⁠. This circle passes through PP⁠, since ∣OP∣=r|OP| = r⁠.

Hence the set of all points related to PP is the circle through PP with centre at the origin.

Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?

The one idea this problem is built on

Give every point PP a single number: its distance ∣OP∣|OP| from the origin OO⁠. Then "PP is related to QQ" just says these two numbers are equal. Equality of numbers is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so RR inherits all three properties. The second part is then a matter of reading the definition of a circle: the points at one fixed distance from a centre are the circle with that centre.

Given, to show, and the plan
Given
AA is the set of all points of the plane, O=(0,0)O = (0,0) is the origin, and (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R exactly when ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ|⁠.
To show
(a) RR is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so it is an equivalence relation. (b) For a point P≠(0,0)P \ne (0,0)⁠, the set {Q∈A:(P,Q)∈R}\{Q \in A : (P,Q)\in R\} is the circle with centre OO passing through PP⁠.
Plan
(1) Write the rule as an equation using the distance formula. (2) to (4) Prove the three properties for arbitrary points. (5) Conclude. (6) Show the set of points related to PP and the circle are the same set, by proving each is contained in the other. (7) Explain why the origin is excluded.

Basics you need

1Distance from the origin

For a point P=(x,y)P = (x, y)⁠, the distance formula gives ∣OP∣=x2+y2|OP| = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}⁠. It is a real number ≥0\ge 0⁠, and it equals 0 only for P=OP = O⁠. For example, P=(3,4)P = (3,4) has ∣OP∣=9+16=5|OP| = \sqrt{9+16} = 5⁠.

2What a relation is

A relation RR in a set AA is a set of ordered pairs of elements of AA⁠. Here the elements are points, so the pairs are pairs of points (P,Q)(P, Q)⁠. Basics: what a relation is

3The three properties

Reflexive: (P,P)∈R(P,P)\in R for every PP⁠. Symmetric: (P,Q)∈R⇒(Q,P)∈R(P,Q)\in R \Rightarrow (Q,P)\in R⁠. Transitive: (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R and (Q,S)∈R⇒(P,S)∈R(Q,S)\in R \Rightarrow (P,S)\in R⁠. All three together make an equivalence relation. Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitive

4Equivalence classes

For an equivalence relation, the set of all elements related to a given element PP is called the equivalence class of PP⁠. The classes split the whole set into non-overlapping pieces. Basics: equivalence classes

5Circle, and how to show two sets are equal

The circle with centre OO and radius r>0r > 0 is the set of all points of the plane at distance rr from OO⁠. Two sets XX and YY are equal when every element of XX is in YY and every element of YY is in XX⁠. Basics: proving and disproving

Solution

  1. Translate the rule into an equation

    Write OO for the origin (0,0)(0,0)⁠. By the distance formula (Basic 1), the rule of RR becomes

    (P,Q)∈R  ⟺  ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣.(P,Q)\in R \iff |OP| = |OQ|.

    Try it on a few pairs, taking P=(3,4)P = (3,4)⁠, which has ∣OP∣=5|OP| = 5⁠:

    QQ∣OQ∣|OQ|Equal to ∣OP∣=5|OP| = 5⁠?(P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R⁠?
    (5,0)(5, 0)25+0=5\sqrt{25+0} = 5yesyes
    (−4,3)(-4, 3)16+9=5\sqrt{16+9} = 5yesyes
    (0,−5)(0, -5)0+25=5\sqrt{0+25} = 5yesyes
    (1,1)(1, 1)1+1=2\sqrt{1+1} = \sqrt2nono
    The words "distance of PP from the origin is same as the distance of QQ" are long. Replacing them by the equation ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ| shows that the relation is nothing but equality of two real numbers. Every property we have to check then becomes a property of the symbol "==", which we know well.
    Each point has exactly one distance from OO⁠, so ∣OP∣|OP| is a well-defined number for every P∈AP\in A⁠. This is what lets us compare the distances of any two points.
  2. Reflexive: is every point related to itself?

    Take any point P∈AP \in A⁠. The number ∣OP∣|OP| is equal to itself:

    ∣OP∣=∣OP∣.|OP| = |OP|.

    By Step 1 this says exactly (P,P)∈R(P,P)\in R⁠. Since PP was an arbitrary point, this holds for every point, and RR is reflexive.

    Reflexivity is a claim about every point, so we take an arbitrary one, a letter PP that could be any point of the plane. The argument uses nothing special about PP⁠, so it works for all points at once. In words: every point is at the same distance from the origin as itself.
    Equality is reflexive: every number equals itself, d=dd = d⁠.
  3. Symmetric: if PP is related to QQ⁠, is QQ related to PP⁠?

    Suppose (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R⁠. Then ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ|⁠. An equation can be read from right to left, so

    ∣OQ∣=∣OP∣.|OQ| = |OP|.

    By Step 1 this means (Q,P)∈R(Q,P)\in R⁠. Hence RR is symmetric.

    Symmetry is an "if … then" statement, so we start from the "if" part, (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R⁠, and use it. The rule "same distance" does not care which point is named first: if PP is as far from OO as QQ is, then QQ is as far from OO as PP is.
    Equality is symmetric: if d1=d2d_1 = d_2 then d2=d1d_2 = d_1⁠.
  4. Transitive: does a chain of two links give a direct link?

    Suppose (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R and (Q,S)∈R(Q,S)\in R⁠, where P,Q,SP, Q, S are any points. Then

    ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣and∣OQ∣=∣OS∣.|OP| = |OQ| \qquad\text{and}\qquad |OQ| = |OS|.

    Both ∣OP∣|OP| and ∣OS∣|OS| are equal to the same number ∣OQ∣|OQ|⁠, so they are equal to each other:

    ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣=∣OS∣⟹∣OP∣=∣OS∣.|OP| = |OQ| = |OS| \quad\Longrightarrow\quad |OP| = |OS|.

    By Step 1, (P,S)∈R(P,S)\in R⁠. Hence RR is transitive.

    The statement we want, (P,S)∈R(P,S)\in R⁠, does not mention the middle point QQ⁠. The two given equations share the quantity ∣OQ∣|OQ|⁠, and chaining them through it removes QQ⁠. In words: if PP and QQ are equally far from OO⁠, and QQ and SS are equally far from OO⁠, then PP and SS are equally far from OO⁠.
    Equality is transitive: if d1=d2d_1 = d_2 and d2=d3d_2 = d_3 then d1=d3d_1 = d_3 ("things equal to the same thing are equal to each other").
  5. Conclude the first part

    RR is reflexive (Step 2), symmetric (Step 3) and transitive (Step 4). By definition, a relation with all three properties is an equivalence relation, so RR is an equivalence relation in AA.

    The definition of an equivalence relation is exactly this list of three properties, so nothing more is needed. Notice the pattern: whenever a relation has the form "PP and QQ have the same value of some quantity", it is an equivalence relation, because equality is. Exercises 1.1 Q7, Q13 and Q14 follow the same pattern.
  6. The points related to P≠OP \ne O form the circle through PP centred at OO

    Fix a point P≠(0,0)P \ne (0,0) and put r=∣OP∣r = |OP|⁠. Because PP is not the origin, r>0r > 0⁠. Let

    [P]={Q∈A:(P,Q)∈R}andC={Q∈A:∣OQ∣=r}.\begin{gathered} [P] = \{Q \in A : (P,Q)\in R\} \quad\text{and}\\ C = \{Q \in A : |OQ| = r\}. \end{gathered}

    CC is, by definition, the circle with centre OO and radius rr⁠. We show [P]=C[P] = C by proving each set is contained in the other.

    • Every point related to PP lies on CC⁠. Let Q∈[P]Q\in[P]⁠. Then (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R⁠, so ∣OQ∣=∣OP∣=r|OQ| = |OP| = r⁠. Hence Q∈CQ\in C⁠.
    • Every point of CC is related to PP⁠. Let Q∈CQ\in C⁠. Then ∣OQ∣=r=∣OP∣|OQ| = r = |OP|⁠, so ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ|⁠, that is (P,Q)∈R(P,Q)\in R⁠. Hence Q∈[P]Q\in[P]⁠.

    So [P]=C[P] = C⁠. Finally, the circle passes through PP⁠, because ∣OP∣=r|OP| = r means P∈CP\in C (this is also reflexivity: PP is related to itself). In coordinates, if P=(a,b)P = (a,b)⁠, the circle is x2+y2=a2+b2x^2 + y^2 = a^2 + b^2⁠. So the set of all points related to PP is the circle through PP with centre at the origin.

    "The set of points related to PP" and "the circle" are two descriptions of sets, and two sets are equal only when they have exactly the same elements. Showing just one inclusion is not enough: we must rule out both "a related point off the circle" and "a point of the circle that is not related". Each direction is one line, because both sets are defined by the same equation ∣OQ∣=∣OP∣|OQ| = |OP|⁠.
    A circle is not just a curve that "looks round": it is defined as the set of all points at a fixed distance (the radius) from a fixed point (the centre). That definition is what makes the two inclusions immediate. Basics: equivalence classes
  7. Why the question excludes P=(0,0)P = (0,0)

    If P=OP = O⁠, then r=∣OO∣=0r = |OO| = 0⁠, and the only point at distance 0 from OO is OO itself (because x2+y2=0\sqrt{x^2+y^2} = 0 forces x=y=0x = y = 0⁠). So the class of the origin is the single point {O}\{O\}⁠, not a circle in the usual sense. That is why the question says P≠(0,0)P \ne (0,0)⁠.

    Putting everything together, RR sorts the plane into equivalence classes: the origin on its own, and one circle centred at OO for each radius r>0r > 0⁠. Different radii give circles that do not meet, and every point of the plane lies on exactly one of them (or is OO⁠).

    5 P (3, 4) (5, 0) (−4, 3) (0, −5) (−3, −4) (2, 0) (0, −2) O gold: the class of P all points at distance 5 blue: the class of (2, 0) all points at distance 2 O: related only to itself
    Equal scales on both axes, so the circles are true circles. Every gold point is at distance 5 from OO⁠, so all gold points are related to each other and to PP⁠. Every blue point is at distance 2. No gold point is related to a blue point, and the origin forms a class of its own.
    Understanding the excluded case shows the answer is complete: the classes are the origin and the circles about it, and together they cover the plane without overlap, exactly as the textbook says any equivalence relation does.
    x2+y2=0\sqrt{x^2+y^2} = 0 means x2+y2=0x^2 + y^2 = 0⁠. A sum of two squares of real numbers is 0 only when both are 0, because each square is ≥0\ge 0⁠.
Result

R={(P,Q):∣OP∣=∣OQ∣}R = \{(P,Q) : |OP| = |OQ|\} is reflexive (∣OP∣=∣OP∣|OP| = |OP|⁠), symmetric (∣OP∣=∣OQ∣⇒∣OQ∣=∣OP∣|OP| = |OQ| \Rightarrow |OQ| = |OP|⁠) and transitive (two equalities through ∣OQ∣|OQ| chain together). So it is an equivalence relation. For P≠(0,0)P \ne (0,0)⁠, the set of points related to PP is exactly {Q:∣OQ∣=∣OP∣}\{Q : |OQ| = |OP|\}⁠, which is the circle with centre OO and radius ∣OP∣|OP|, and it passes through PP⁠. (The textbook gives no separate answer for this "show that" question.)

Check it with numbers

Take P=(3,4)P = (3,4)⁠, Q=(−4,3)Q = (-4,3)⁠, S=(0,−5)S = (0,-5)⁠. Then ∣OP∣=9+16=5|OP| = \sqrt{9+16} = 5⁠, ∣OQ∣=16+9=5|OQ| = \sqrt{16+9} = 5 and ∣OS∣=0+25=5|OS| = \sqrt{0+25} = 5⁠. So (P,Q)(P,Q) and (Q,S)(Q,S) are in RR⁠, and transitivity predicts (P,S)∈R(P,S)\in R⁠: indeed ∣OP∣=∣OS∣=5|OP| = |OS| = 5⁠. ✓ A computer search over all 169 points with whole-number coordinates from −6-6 to 66 confirms the three properties, and finds exactly 12 of those points related to (3,4)(3,4)⁠: (±3,±4)(\pm3,\pm4)⁠, (±4,±3)(\pm4,\pm3)⁠, (±5,0)(\pm5,0)⁠, (0,±5)(0,\pm5)⁠, all on the circle x2+y2=25x^2+y^2 = 25⁠.

Common mistakes
  1. Confusing "same distance from the origin" with "same distance from each other". PP and QQ are related when ∣OP∣=∣OQ∣|OP| = |OQ|⁠; the distance ∣PQ∣|PQ| between them plays no part.
  2. Proving only one inclusion. Showing "related points lie on the circle" does not show every point of the circle is related to PP⁠. Both directions are needed for the sets to be equal.
  3. Forgetting that PP itself is on the circle. The question says the circle passes through PP⁠; this follows from ∣OP∣=r|OP| = r⁠, and it is worth stating.
  4. Ignoring the case P=OP = O⁠. Its class is just {O}\{O\}⁠, a single point. The question excludes it on purpose.
What to take away
  1. "Same value of some quantity" relations (same distance, same number of pages, same number of sides) are always equivalence relations, because equality is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
  2. The equivalence class of an element is the set of all elements with the same value of that quantity. Here that is a circle, a geometric picture of an equivalence class.
  3. To prove two sets are equal, prove containment in both directions.

Every fact used, and where it comes from

FactUsed inSource
Distance from the origin x2+y2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}Steps 1, 7Distance formula (Class XI coordinate geometry)
Equality is reflexive, symmetric, transitiveSteps 2–4Basic properties of equality of real numbers
Reflexive, symmetric, transitive, equivalenceSteps 2–5Definitions 3 and 4, Section 1.2 (Lesson: types of relations)
Circle = all points at distance rr from the centreStep 6Definition of a circle (Class XI conic sections)
Two sets are equal when each contains the otherStep 6Equality of sets (Class XI sets)
Equivalence classes partition the setStep 7Section 1.2, note after Example 5 (Lesson: equivalence relations)
All numerical values and the 12 lattice pointsSteps 1, 7; CheckRecomputed in the site's verification script
Found an error, or want more?

Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →