Exercise 1.1 · Q11: Points at the same distance from the origin
Show that the relation in the set of points in a plane given by distance of the point from the origin is same as the distance of the point from the origin, is an equivalence relation. Further, show that the set of all points related to a point is the circle passing through with origin as centre.
Let be the origin. Then .
Reflexive: Let . Then , so . Thus is reflexive.
Symmetric: Let . Then , so and . Thus is symmetric.
Transitive: Let . Then and , so and . Thus is transitive.
Hence is an equivalence relation.
Now let and , so . Then , that is, lies on the circle with centre and radius . This circle passes through , since .
Hence the set of all points related to is the circle through with centre at the origin.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Give every point a single number: its distance from the origin . Then " is related to " just says these two numbers are equal. Equality of numbers is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so inherits all three properties. The second part is then a matter of reading the definition of a circle: the points at one fixed distance from a centre are the circle with that centre.
- Given
- is the set of all points of the plane, is the origin, and exactly when .
- To show
- (a) is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so it is an equivalence relation. (b) For a point , the set is the circle with centre passing through .
- Plan
- (1) Write the rule as an equation using the distance formula. (2) to (4) Prove the three properties for arbitrary points. (5) Conclude. (6) Show the set of points related to and the circle are the same set, by proving each is contained in the other. (7) Explain why the origin is excluded.
Basics you need
For a point , the distance formula gives . It is a real number , and it equals 0 only for . For example, has .
A relation in a set is a set of ordered pairs of elements of . Here the elements are points, so the pairs are pairs of points . Basics: what a relation is
Reflexive: for every . Symmetric: . Transitive: and . All three together make an equivalence relation. Basics: reflexive, symmetric, transitive
For an equivalence relation, the set of all elements related to a given element is called the equivalence class of . The classes split the whole set into non-overlapping pieces. Basics: equivalence classes
The circle with centre and radius is the set of all points of the plane at distance from . Two sets and are equal when every element of is in and every element of is in . Basics: proving and disproving
Solution
Translate the rule into an equation
Write for the origin . By the distance formula (Basic 1), the rule of becomes
Try it on a few pairs, taking , which has :
Equal to ? ? yes yes yes yes yes yes no no The words "distance of from the origin is same as the distance of " are long. Replacing them by the equation shows that the relation is nothing but equality of two real numbers. Every property we have to check then becomes a property of the symbol "", which we know well.Each point has exactly one distance from , so is a well-defined number for every . This is what lets us compare the distances of any two points.Reflexive: is every point related to itself?
Take any point . The number is equal to itself:
By Step 1 this says exactly . Since was an arbitrary point, this holds for every point, and is reflexive.
Reflexivity is a claim about every point, so we take an arbitrary one, a letter that could be any point of the plane. The argument uses nothing special about , so it works for all points at once. In words: every point is at the same distance from the origin as itself.Equality is reflexive: every number equals itself, .Symmetric: if is related to , is related to ?
Suppose . Then . An equation can be read from right to left, so
By Step 1 this means . Hence is symmetric.
Symmetry is an "if … then" statement, so we start from the "if" part, , and use it. The rule "same distance" does not care which point is named first: if is as far from as is, then is as far from as is.Equality is symmetric: if then .Transitive: does a chain of two links give a direct link?
Suppose and , where are any points. Then
Both and are equal to the same number , so they are equal to each other:
By Step 1, . Hence is transitive.
The statement we want, , does not mention the middle point . The two given equations share the quantity , and chaining them through it removes . In words: if and are equally far from , and and are equally far from , then and are equally far from .Equality is transitive: if and then ("things equal to the same thing are equal to each other").Conclude the first part
is reflexive (Step 2), symmetric (Step 3) and transitive (Step 4). By definition, a relation with all three properties is an equivalence relation, so is an equivalence relation in .
The definition of an equivalence relation is exactly this list of three properties, so nothing more is needed. Notice the pattern: whenever a relation has the form " and have the same value of some quantity", it is an equivalence relation, because equality is. Exercises 1.1 Q7, Q13 and Q14 follow the same pattern.The points related to form the circle through centred at
Fix a point and put . Because is not the origin, . Let
is, by definition, the circle with centre and radius . We show by proving each set is contained in the other.
- Every point related to lies on . Let . Then , so . Hence .
- Every point of is related to . Let . Then , so , that is . Hence .
So . Finally, the circle passes through , because means (this is also reflexivity: is related to itself). In coordinates, if , the circle is . So the set of all points related to is the circle through with centre at the origin.
"The set of points related to " and "the circle" are two descriptions of sets, and two sets are equal only when they have exactly the same elements. Showing just one inclusion is not enough: we must rule out both "a related point off the circle" and "a point of the circle that is not related". Each direction is one line, because both sets are defined by the same equation .A circle is not just a curve that "looks round": it is defined as the set of all points at a fixed distance (the radius) from a fixed point (the centre). That definition is what makes the two inclusions immediate. Basics: equivalence classesWhy the question excludes
If , then , and the only point at distance 0 from is itself (because forces ). So the class of the origin is the single point , not a circle in the usual sense. That is why the question says .
Putting everything together, sorts the plane into equivalence classes: the origin on its own, and one circle centred at for each radius . Different radii give circles that do not meet, and every point of the plane lies on exactly one of them (or is ).
Equal scales on both axes, so the circles are true circles. Every gold point is at distance 5 from , so all gold points are related to each other and to . Every blue point is at distance 2. No gold point is related to a blue point, and the origin forms a class of its own. Understanding the excluded case shows the answer is complete: the classes are the origin and the circles about it, and together they cover the plane without overlap, exactly as the textbook says any equivalence relation does.means . A sum of two squares of real numbers is 0 only when both are 0, because each square is .
is reflexive (), symmetric () and transitive (two equalities through chain together). So it is an equivalence relation. For , the set of points related to is exactly , which is the circle with centre and radius , and it passes through . (The textbook gives no separate answer for this "show that" question.)
Take , , . Then , and . So and are in , and transitivity predicts : indeed . ✓ A computer search over all 169 points with whole-number coordinates from to confirms the three properties, and finds exactly 12 of those points related to : , , , , all on the circle .
- Confusing "same distance from the origin" with "same distance from each other". and are related when ; the distance between them plays no part.
- Proving only one inclusion. Showing "related points lie on the circle" does not show every point of the circle is related to . Both directions are needed for the sets to be equal.
- Forgetting that itself is on the circle. The question says the circle passes through ; this follows from , and it is worth stating.
- Ignoring the case . Its class is just , a single point. The question excludes it on purpose.
- "Same value of some quantity" relations (same distance, same number of pages, same number of sides) are always equivalence relations, because equality is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
- The equivalence class of an element is the set of all elements with the same value of that quantity. Here that is a circle, a geometric picture of an equivalence class.
- To prove two sets are equal, prove containment in both directions.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Distance from the origin | Steps 1, 7 | Distance formula (Class XI coordinate geometry) |
| Equality is reflexive, symmetric, transitive | Steps 2–4 | Basic properties of equality of real numbers |
| Reflexive, symmetric, transitive, equivalence | Steps 2–5 | Definitions 3 and 4, Section 1.2 (Lesson: types of relations) |
| Circle = all points at distance from the centre | Step 6 | Definition of a circle (Class XI conic sections) |
| Two sets are equal when each contains the other | Step 6 | Equality of sets (Class XI sets) |
| Equivalence classes partition the set | Step 7 | Section 1.2, note after Example 5 (Lesson: equivalence relations) |
| All numerical values and the 12 lattice points | Steps 1, 7; Check | Recomputed in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →