Exam answer Show all explanations
(a)
The lines are not parallel, as 7 i ^ − 6 j ^ + k ^ 7\hat i - 6\hat j + \hat k 7 i ^ − 6 j ^ + k ^ and i ^ − 2 j ^ + k ^ \hat i - 2\hat j + \hat k i ^ − 2 j ^ + k ^ are not parallel. Let PQ, with P on l 1 l_1 l 1 and Q on l 2 l_2 l 2 , be the line segment perpendicular to both lines. Then PQ is the shortest distance.
Why?
The direction ratios 7, − 6 -6 − 6 , 1 and 1, − 2 -2 − 2 , 1 are not proportional (7 1 ≠ − 6 − 2 \frac71 \ne \frac{-6}{-2} 1 7 = − 2 − 6 ) , so the directions differ.
For two lines that are not parallel, the shortest distance is along their common perpendicular. So we look for the points P and Q where the segment PQ is perpendicular to both lines.
The position vector of P, for some λ \lambda λ , is
( 7 λ − 1 ) i ^ − ( 6 λ + 1 ) j ^ + ( λ − 1 ) k ^ (7\lambda - 1)\hat i - (6\lambda + 1)\hat j + (\lambda - 1)\hat k ( 7 λ − 1 ) i ^ − ( 6 λ + 1 ) j ^ + ( λ − 1 ) k ^
and of Q, for some μ \mu μ , is
( μ + 3 ) i ^ + ( − 2 μ + 5 ) j ^ + ( μ + 7 ) k ^ (\mu + 3)\hat i + (-2\mu + 5)\hat j + (\mu + 7)\hat k ( μ + 3 ) i ^ + ( − 2 μ + 5 ) j ^ + ( μ + 7 ) k ^
Why?
Every point of the line r ⃗ = a ⃗ + λ b ⃗ \vec r = \vec a + \lambda\vec b r = a + λ b has this form for some value of the parameter. Collect the components of l 1 l_1 l 1 :
i ^ : − 1 + 7 λ j ^ : − 1 − 6 λ = − ( 6 λ + 1 ) k ^ : − 1 + λ \begin{aligned} \hat i&: -1 + 7\lambda \\ \hat j&: -1 - 6\lambda = -(6\lambda + 1) \\ \hat k&: -1 + \lambda \end{aligned} i ^ j ^ k ^ : − 1 + 7 λ : − 1 − 6 λ = − ( 6 λ + 1 ) : − 1 + λ
In the same way for l 2 l_2 l 2 , with μ \mu μ .
P Q → = ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) i ^ + ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) j ^ + ( μ − λ + 8 ) k ^ \begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{PQ} &= (\mu - 7\lambda + 4)\hat i \\ &\quad + (-2\mu + 6\lambda + 6)\hat j \\ &\quad + (\mu - \lambda + 8)\hat k \end{aligned} PQ = ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) i ^ + ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) j ^ + ( μ − λ + 8 ) k ^
Why?
P Q → \overrightarrow{PQ} PQ is the position vector of Q minus that of P, component by component:
( μ + 3 ) − ( 7 λ − 1 ) ( − 2 μ + 5 ) + ( 6 λ + 1 ) ( μ + 7 ) − ( λ − 1 ) \begin{aligned} &(\mu + 3) - (7\lambda - 1) \\ &(-2\mu + 5) + (6\lambda + 1) \\ &(\mu + 7) - (\lambda - 1) \end{aligned} ( μ + 3 ) − ( 7 λ − 1 ) ( − 2 μ + 5 ) + ( 6 λ + 1 ) ( μ + 7 ) − ( λ − 1 )
Open the brackets (a minus in front changes every sign inside):
i ^ : μ + 3 − 7 λ + 1 = μ − 7 λ + 4 j ^ : − 2 μ + 5 + 6 λ + 1 = − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 k ^ : μ + 7 − λ + 1 = μ − λ + 8 \begin{aligned} \hat i&: \mu + 3 - 7\lambda + 1 \\ &= \mu - 7\lambda + 4 \\ \hat j&: -2\mu + 5 + 6\lambda + 1 \\ &= -2\mu + 6\lambda + 6 \\ \hat k&: \mu + 7 - \lambda + 1 \\ &= \mu - \lambda + 8 \end{aligned} i ^ j ^ k ^ : μ + 3 − 7 λ + 1 = μ − 7 λ + 4 : − 2 μ + 5 + 6 λ + 1 = − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 : μ + 7 − λ + 1 = μ − λ + 8
P Q → \overrightarrow{PQ} PQ is perpendicular to 7 i ^ − 6 j ^ + k ^ 7\hat i - 6\hat j + \hat k 7 i ^ − 6 j ^ + k ^ and to i ^ − 2 j ^ + k ^ \hat i - 2\hat j + \hat k i ^ − 2 j ^ + k ^ :
7 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) − 6 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) + ( μ − λ + 8 ) = 0 ⇒ 7 μ − 49 λ + 28 + 12 μ − 36 λ − 36 + μ − λ + 8 = 0 ⇒ 20 μ − 86 λ = 0 ⇒ 10 μ − 43 λ = 0 \begin{aligned} &7(\mu - 7\lambda + 4) - 6(-2\mu + 6\lambda + 6) \\ &\qquad + (\mu - \lambda + 8) = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 7\mu - 49\lambda + 28 + 12\mu - 36\lambda \\ &\qquad - 36 + \mu - \lambda + 8 = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 20\mu - 86\lambda = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 10\mu - 43\lambda = 0 \end{aligned} 7 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) − 6 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) + ( μ − λ + 8 ) = 0 ⇒ 7 μ − 49 λ + 28 + 12 μ − 36 λ − 36 + μ − λ + 8 = 0 ⇒ 20 μ − 86 λ = 0 ⇒ 10 μ − 43 λ = 0
Why?
Perpendicular vectors have dot product 0. Dot P Q → \overrightarrow{PQ} PQ with the direction 7, − 6 -6 − 6 , 1 of l 1 l_1 l 1 .
Multiply out each bracket:
7 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) = 7 μ − 49 λ + 28 − 6 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) = 12 μ − 36 λ − 36 1 ( μ − λ + 8 ) = μ − λ + 8 \begin{aligned} &7(\mu - 7\lambda + 4) \\ &= 7\mu - 49\lambda + 28 \\[4pt] &-6(-2\mu + 6\lambda + 6) \\ &= 12\mu - 36\lambda - 36 \\[4pt] &1(\mu - \lambda + 8) \\ &= \mu - \lambda + 8 \end{aligned} 7 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) = 7 μ − 49 λ + 28 − 6 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) = 12 μ − 36 λ − 36 1 ( μ − λ + 8 ) = μ − λ + 8
Collect like terms:
7 + 12 + 1 = 20 − 49 − 36 − 1 = − 86 28 − 36 + 8 = 0 \begin{aligned} 7 + 12 + 1 &= 20 \\ -49 - 36 - 1 &= -86 \\ 28 - 36 + 8 &= 0 \end{aligned} 7 + 12 + 1 − 49 − 36 − 1 28 − 36 + 8 = 20 = − 86 = 0
Then divide by 2.
20 μ 2 − 86 λ 2 = 0 2 10 μ − 43 λ = 0 \begin{aligned} \frac{20\mu}{2} - \frac{86\lambda}{2} &= \frac02 \\ 10\mu - 43\lambda &= 0 \end{aligned} 2 20 μ − 2 86 λ 10 μ − 43 λ = 2 0 = 0
( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) − 2 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) + ( μ − λ + 8 ) = 0 ⇒ μ − 7 λ + 4 + 4 μ − 12 λ − 12 + μ − λ + 8 = 0 ⇒ 6 μ − 20 λ = 0 ⇒ 3 μ − 10 λ = 0 \begin{aligned} &(\mu - 7\lambda + 4) - 2(-2\mu + 6\lambda + 6) \\ &\qquad + (\mu - \lambda + 8) = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow \mu - 7\lambda + 4 + 4\mu - 12\lambda \\ &\qquad - 12 + \mu - \lambda + 8 = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 6\mu - 20\lambda = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 3\mu - 10\lambda = 0 \end{aligned} ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) − 2 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) + ( μ − λ + 8 ) = 0 ⇒ μ − 7 λ + 4 + 4 μ − 12 λ − 12 + μ − λ + 8 = 0 ⇒ 6 μ − 20 λ = 0 ⇒ 3 μ − 10 λ = 0
Why?
The same with the direction 1, − 2 -2 − 2 , 1 of l 2 l_2 l 2 :
1 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) = μ − 7 λ + 4 − 2 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) = 4 μ − 12 λ − 12 1 ( μ − λ + 8 ) = μ − λ + 8 \begin{aligned} &1(\mu - 7\lambda + 4) \\ &= \mu - 7\lambda + 4 \\[4pt] &-2(-2\mu + 6\lambda + 6) \\ &= 4\mu - 12\lambda - 12 \\[4pt] &1(\mu - \lambda + 8) \\ &= \mu - \lambda + 8 \end{aligned} 1 ( μ − 7 λ + 4 ) = μ − 7 λ + 4 − 2 ( − 2 μ + 6 λ + 6 ) = 4 μ − 12 λ − 12 1 ( μ − λ + 8 ) = μ − λ + 8
Collect like terms:
1 + 4 + 1 = 6 − 7 − 12 − 1 = − 20 4 − 12 + 8 = 0 \begin{aligned} 1 + 4 + 1 &= 6 \\ -7 - 12 - 1 &= -20 \\ 4 - 12 + 8 &= 0 \end{aligned} 1 + 4 + 1 − 7 − 12 − 1 4 − 12 + 8 = 6 = − 20 = 0
Then divide by 2.
6 μ 2 − 20 λ 2 = 0 2 3 μ − 10 λ = 0 \begin{aligned} \frac{6\mu}{2} - \frac{20\lambda}{2} &= \frac02 \\ 3\mu - 10\lambda &= 0 \end{aligned} 2 6 μ − 2 20 λ 3 μ − 10 λ = 2 0 = 0
3 μ = 10 λ ⇒ μ = 10 λ 3 ⇒ 100 λ 3 = 43 λ ⇒ 100 λ = 129 λ ⇒ λ = 0 \begin{aligned} &3\mu = 10\lambda \Rightarrow \mu = \frac{10\lambda}{3} \\ &\Rightarrow \frac{100\lambda}{3} = 43\lambda \\ &\Rightarrow 100\lambda = 129\lambda \Rightarrow \lambda = 0 \end{aligned} 3 μ = 10 λ ⇒ μ = 3 10 λ ⇒ 3 100 λ = 43 λ ⇒ 100 λ = 129 λ ⇒ λ = 0
Why?
Put μ \mu μ from the second equation into 10 μ − 43 λ = 0 10\mu - 43\lambda = 0 10 μ − 43 λ = 0 . Then 29 λ = 0 29\lambda = 0 29 λ = 0 , so λ = 0 \lambda = 0 λ = 0 , and μ = 10 ( 0 ) 3 = 0 \mu = \frac{10(0)}{3} = 0 μ = 3 10 ( 0 ) = 0 .
10 ( 10 λ 3 ) − 43 λ = 0 100 λ 3 = 43 λ 100 λ = 129 λ ( × 3 ) 0 = 129 λ − 100 λ 29 λ = 0 λ = 0 ( ÷ 29 ) \begin{aligned} 10\left(\frac{10\lambda}{3}\right) - 43\lambda &= 0 \\ \frac{100\lambda}{3} &= 43\lambda \\ 100\lambda &= 129\lambda \quad (\times\,3) \\ 0 &= 129\lambda - 100\lambda \\ 29\lambda &= 0 \\ \lambda &= 0 \quad (\div\,29) \end{aligned} 10 ( 3 10 λ ) − 43 λ 3 100 λ 100 λ 0 29 λ λ = 0 = 43 λ = 129 λ ( × 3 ) = 129 λ − 100 λ = 0 = 0 ( ÷ 29 )
On solving these equations, μ = λ = 0 \mu = \lambda = 0 μ = λ = 0 .
So, the position vectors of P and Q are − i ^ − j ^ − k ^ -\hat i - \hat j - \hat k − i ^ − j ^ − k ^ and 3 i ^ + 5 j ^ + 7 k ^ 3\hat i + 5\hat j + 7\hat k 3 i ^ + 5 j ^ + 7 k ^ .
Why?
With λ = 0 \lambda = 0 λ = 0 and μ = 0 \mu = 0 μ = 0 , P and Q are the given points of the two lines, ( − 1 , − 1 , − 1 ) (-1, -1, -1) ( − 1 , − 1 , − 1 ) and ( 3 , 5 , 7 ) (3, 5, 7) ( 3 , 5 , 7 ) .
Then P Q → \overrightarrow{PQ} PQ is Q minus P:
i ^ : 3 − ( − 1 ) = 3 + 1 = 4 j ^ : 5 − ( − 1 ) = 5 + 1 = 6 k ^ : 7 − ( − 1 ) = 7 + 1 = 8 \begin{aligned} \hat i&: 3 - (-1) = 3 + 1 = 4 \\ \hat j&: 5 - (-1) = 5 + 1 = 6 \\ \hat k&: 7 - (-1) = 7 + 1 = 8 \end{aligned} i ^ j ^ k ^ : 3 − ( − 1 ) = 3 + 1 = 4 : 5 − ( − 1 ) = 5 + 1 = 6 : 7 − ( − 1 ) = 7 + 1 = 8
P Q → = 4 i ^ + 6 j ^ + 8 k ^ \overrightarrow{PQ} = 4\hat i + 6\hat j + 8\hat k PQ = 4 i ^ + 6 j ^ + 8 k ^
∣ P Q → ∣ = 4 2 + 6 2 + 8 2 = 116 \lvert\overrightarrow{PQ}\rvert = \sqrt{4^2 + 6^2 + 8^2} = \sqrt{116} ∣ PQ ∣ = 4 2 + 6 2 + 8 2 = 116
Why?
16 + 36 + 64 = 116 16 + 36 + 64 = 116 16 + 36 + 64 = 116 , and 116 = 4 × 29 116 = 4 \times 29 116 = 4 × 29 , so
4 2 = 16 , 6 2 = 36 , 8 2 = 64 16 + 36 = 52 52 + 64 = 116 \begin{aligned} 4^2 = 16,\ 6^2 &= 36,\ 8^2 = 64 \\ 16 + 36 &= 52 \\ 52 + 64 &= 116 \end{aligned} 4 2 = 16 , 6 2 16 + 36 52 + 64 = 36 , 8 2 = 64 = 52 = 116
116 = 4 × 29 = 2 29 \sqrt{116} = \sqrt{4 \times 29} = 2\sqrt{29} 116 = 4 × 29 = 2 29
Check with the shortest distance formula for skew lines. Here b 1 ⃗ × b 2 ⃗ = − 4 i ^ − 6 j ^ − 8 k ^ \vec{b_1} \times \vec{b_2} = -4\hat i - 6\hat j - 8\hat k b 1 × b 2 = − 4 i ^ − 6 j ^ − 8 k ^ and a 2 ⃗ − a 1 ⃗ = 4 i ^ + 6 j ^ + 8 k ^ \vec{a_2} - \vec{a_1} = 4\hat i + 6\hat j + 8\hat k a 2 − a 1 = 4 i ^ + 6 j ^ + 8 k ^ . Their dot product is − 116 -116 − 116 , so the distance is
b 1 ⃗ × b 2 ⃗ = ∣ i ^ j ^ k ^ 7 − 6 1 1 − 2 1 ∣ i ^ : ( − 6 ) ( 1 ) − ( 1 ) ( − 2 ) = − 6 + 2 = − 4 j ^ : − ( ( 7 ) ( 1 ) − ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ) = − ( 7 − 1 ) = − 6 k ^ : ( 7 ) ( − 2 ) − ( − 6 ) ( 1 ) = − 14 + 6 = − 8 ( − 4 ) ( 4 ) + ( − 6 ) ( 6 ) + ( − 8 ) ( 8 ) = − 16 − 36 − 64 = − 116 ∣ b 1 ⃗ × b 2 ⃗ ∣ = 16 + 36 + 64 = 116 \begin{aligned} \vec{b_1} \times \vec{b_2} &= \begin{vmatrix} \hat i & \hat j & \hat k \\ 7 & -6 & 1 \\ 1 & -2 & 1 \end{vmatrix} \\[4pt] \hat i&: (-6)(1) - (1)(-2) \\ &= -6 + 2 = -4 \\ \hat j&: -\big((7)(1) - (1)(1)\big) \\ &= -(7 - 1) = -6 \\ \hat k&: (7)(-2) - (-6)(1) \\ &= -14 + 6 = -8 \\[4pt] &(-4)(4) + (-6)(6) + (-8)(8) \\ &= -16 - 36 - 64 = -116 \\[4pt] \lvert\vec{b_1} \times \vec{b_2}\rvert &= \sqrt{16 + 36 + 64} = \sqrt{116} \end{aligned} b 1 × b 2 i ^ j ^ k ^ ∣ b 1 × b 2 ∣ = i ^ 7 1 j ^ − 6 − 2 k ^ 1 1 : ( − 6 ) ( 1 ) − ( 1 ) ( − 2 ) = − 6 + 2 = − 4 : − ( ( 7 ) ( 1 ) − ( 1 ) ( 1 ) ) = − ( 7 − 1 ) = − 6 : ( 7 ) ( − 2 ) − ( − 6 ) ( 1 ) = − 14 + 6 = − 8 ( − 4 ) ( 4 ) + ( − 6 ) ( 6 ) + ( − 8 ) ( 8 ) = − 16 − 36 − 64 = − 116 = 16 + 36 + 64 = 116
∣ − 116 ∣ 116 = 116 \frac{\lvert -116\rvert}{\sqrt{116}} = \sqrt{116} 116 ∣ − 116 ∣ = 116
∴ \therefore ∴ Shortest distance = 2 29 = 2\sqrt{29} = 2 29 units.
(b)
Let P ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) P(1, 2, 1) P ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) be the given point and L the foot of the perpendicular from P to the given line.
Put x − 3 1 = y + 1 2 = z − 1 3 = λ \text{Put } \frac{x - 3}{1} = \frac{y + 1}{2} = \frac{z - 1}{3} = \lambda Put 1 x − 3 = 2 y + 1 = 3 z − 1 = λ
Then x = λ + 3 x = \lambda + 3 x = λ + 3 , y = 2 λ − 1 y = 2\lambda - 1 y = 2 λ − 1 , z = 3 λ + 1 z = 3\lambda + 1 z = 3 λ + 1 , so L is ( λ + 3 , 2 λ − 1 , 3 λ + 1 ) (\lambda + 3, 2\lambda - 1, 3\lambda + 1) ( λ + 3 , 2 λ − 1 , 3 λ + 1 ) .
Why?
Setting the equal fractions to a parameter λ \lambda λ gives every point of the line in one form. L lies on the line, so it has this form for one particular λ \lambda λ .
Direction ratios of PL are
λ + 3 − 1 , 2 λ − 1 − 2 , 3 λ + 1 − 1 i.e. λ + 2 , 2 λ − 3 , 3 λ \begin{aligned} &\lambda + 3 - 1,\ 2\lambda - 1 - 2,\ 3\lambda + 1 - 1 \\ &\text{i.e. } \lambda + 2,\ 2\lambda - 3,\ 3\lambda \end{aligned} λ + 3 − 1 , 2 λ − 1 − 2 , 3 λ + 1 − 1 i.e. λ + 2 , 2 λ − 3 , 3 λ
Why?
The direction ratios of the line joining two points are the differences of their coordinates, here L minus P with P = ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) P = (1, 2, 1) P = ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) .
Direction ratios of the given line are 1, 2, 3, and it is perpendicular to PL:
( λ + 2 ) 1 + ( 2 λ − 3 ) 2 + 3 λ ⋅ 3 = 0 ⇒ λ + 2 + 4 λ − 6 + 9 λ = 0 ⇒ 14 λ = 4 ⇒ λ = 2 7 \begin{aligned} &(\lambda + 2)1 + (2\lambda - 3)2 + 3\lambda\cdot 3 = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow \lambda + 2 + 4\lambda - 6 + 9\lambda = 0 \\ &\Rightarrow 14\lambda = 4 \Rightarrow \lambda = \frac27 \end{aligned} ( λ + 2 ) 1 + ( 2 λ − 3 ) 2 + 3 λ ⋅ 3 = 0 ⇒ λ + 2 + 4 λ − 6 + 9 λ = 0 ⇒ 14 λ = 4 ⇒ λ = 7 2
Why?
Two lines with direction ratios a 1 , b 1 , c 1 a_1, b_1, c_1 a 1 , b 1 , c 1 and a 2 , b 2 , c 2 a_2, b_2, c_2 a 2 , b 2 , c 2 are perpendicular when
a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 + c 1 c 2 = 0 a_1a_2 + b_1b_2 + c_1c_2 = 0 a 1 a 2 + b 1 b 2 + c 1 c 2 = 0
( λ + 2 ) ( 1 ) = λ + 2 ( 2 λ − 3 ) ( 2 ) = 4 λ − 6 ( 3 λ ) ( 3 ) = 9 λ \begin{aligned} (\lambda + 2)(1) &= \lambda + 2 \\ (2\lambda - 3)(2) &= 4\lambda - 6 \\ (3\lambda)(3) &= 9\lambda \end{aligned} ( λ + 2 ) ( 1 ) ( 2 λ − 3 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 λ ) ( 3 ) = λ + 2 = 4 λ − 6 = 9 λ
Collect: 1 + 4 + 9 = 14 1 + 4 + 9 = 14 1 + 4 + 9 = 14 and 2 − 6 = − 4 2 - 6 = -4 2 − 6 = − 4 , so 14 λ − 4 = 0 14\lambda - 4 = 0 14 λ − 4 = 0 .
14 λ − 4 = 0 14 λ = 4 λ = 4 14 = 4 ÷ 2 14 ÷ 2 = 2 7 \begin{aligned} 14\lambda - 4 &= 0 \\ 14\lambda &= 4 \\ \lambda &= \frac{4}{14} = \frac{4 \div 2}{14 \div 2} = \frac27 \end{aligned} 14 λ − 4 14 λ λ = 0 = 4 = 14 4 = 14 ÷ 2 4 ÷ 2 = 7 2
Then λ + 3 = 23 7 \lambda + 3 = \frac{23}{7} λ + 3 = 7 23 , 2 λ − 1 = − 3 7 2\lambda - 1 = -\frac37 2 λ − 1 = − 7 3 , 3 λ + 1 = 13 7 3\lambda + 1 = \frac{13}{7} 3 λ + 1 = 7 13 , so L is ( 23 7 , − 3 7 , 13 7 ) \left(\frac{23}{7}, -\frac37, \frac{13}{7}\right) ( 7 23 , − 7 3 , 7 13 ) .
Why?
With λ = 2 7 \lambda = \frac27 λ = 7 2 :
2 7 + 3 = 2 + 21 7 4 7 − 1 = 4 − 7 7 6 7 + 1 = 6 + 7 7 \begin{aligned} \frac27 + 3 &= \frac{2 + 21}{7} \\ \frac47 - 1 &= \frac{4 - 7}{7} \\ \frac67 + 1 &= \frac{6 + 7}{7} \end{aligned} 7 2 + 3 7 4 − 1 7 6 + 1 = 7 2 + 21 = 7 4 − 7 = 7 6 + 7
(2 λ = 2 × 2 7 = 4 7 2\lambda = 2 \times \frac27 = \frac47 2 λ = 2 × 7 2 = 7 4 , 3 λ = 3 × 2 7 = 6 7 3\lambda = 3 \times \frac27 = \frac67 3 λ = 3 × 7 2 = 7 6 , and 3 = 21 7 3 = \frac{21}{7} 3 = 7 21 , 1 = 7 7 1 = \frac77 1 = 7 7 . ) So
2 + 21 7 = 23 7 4 − 7 7 = − 3 7 6 + 7 7 = 13 7 \begin{aligned} \frac{2 + 21}{7} &= \frac{23}{7} \\ \frac{4 - 7}{7} &= -\frac37 \\ \frac{6 + 7}{7} &= \frac{13}{7} \end{aligned} 7 2 + 21 7 4 − 7 7 6 + 7 = 7 23 = − 7 3 = 7 13
Let Q ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 ) Q(x_1, y_1, z_1) Q ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 ) be the image of P. Then L is the mid-point of PQ:
1 + x 1 2 = 23 7 , 2 + y 1 2 = − 3 7 , \frac{1 + x_1}{2} = \frac{23}{7},\ \frac{2 + y_1}{2} = -\frac37, 2 1 + x 1 = 7 23 , 2 2 + y 1 = − 7 3 ,
1 + z 1 2 = 13 7 \frac{1 + z_1}{2} = \frac{13}{7} 2 1 + z 1 = 7 13
Why?
The line acts like a mirror. The image Q is as far beyond the line as P is in front of it, along the same perpendicular. So the foot L is the mid-point of PQ.
Mid-point of ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 ) (x_1, y_1, z_1) ( x 1 , y 1 , z 1 ) and ( x 2 , y 2 , z 2 ) (x_2, y_2, z_2) ( x 2 , y 2 , z 2 ) :
( x 1 + x 2 2 , y 1 + y 2 2 , z 1 + z 2 2 ) \left(\frac{x_1 + x_2}{2}, \frac{y_1 + y_2}{2}, \frac{z_1 + z_2}{2}\right) ( 2 x 1 + x 2 , 2 y 1 + y 2 , 2 z 1 + z 2 )
⇒ x 1 = 39 7 , y 1 = − 20 7 , z 1 = 19 7 \Rightarrow x_1 = \frac{39}{7},\ y_1 = -\frac{20}{7},\ z_1 = \frac{19}{7} ⇒ x 1 = 7 39 , y 1 = − 7 20 , z 1 = 7 19
Why?
Multiply each equation by 2, then subtract:
1 + x 1 = 2 × 23 7 = 46 7 2 + y 1 = 2 × ( − 3 7 ) = − 6 7 1 + z 1 = 2 × 13 7 = 26 7 \begin{aligned} 1 + x_1 &= 2 \times \frac{23}{7} = \frac{46}{7} \\ 2 + y_1 &= 2 \times \left(-\frac37\right) = -\frac67 \\ 1 + z_1 &= 2 \times \frac{13}{7} = \frac{26}{7} \end{aligned} 1 + x 1 2 + y 1 1 + z 1 = 2 × 7 23 = 7 46 = 2 × ( − 7 3 ) = − 7 6 = 2 × 7 13 = 7 26
Subtract 1, 2 and 1 (that is 7 7 \frac77 7 7 , 14 7 \frac{14}{7} 7 14 and 7 7 \frac77 7 7 ) :
x 1 = 46 7 − 1 = 39 7 y 1 = − 6 7 − 2 = − 20 7 z 1 = 26 7 − 1 = 19 7 \begin{aligned} x_1 &= \frac{46}{7} - 1 = \frac{39}{7} \\ y_1 &= -\frac67 - 2 = -\frac{20}{7} \\ z_1 &= \frac{26}{7} - 1 = \frac{19}{7} \end{aligned} x 1 y 1 z 1 = 7 46 − 1 = 7 39 = − 7 6 − 2 = − 7 20 = 7 26 − 1 = 7 19
Hence, the image of P ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) P(1, 2, 1) P ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) is Q ( 39 7 , − 20 7 , 19 7 ) Q\left(\frac{39}{7}, -\frac{20}{7}, \frac{19}{7}\right) Q ( 7 39 , − 7 20 , 7 19 ) .
The line joining P and Q is
x − 1 32 7 = y − 2 − 34 7 = z − 1 12 7 \frac{x - 1}{\dfrac{32}{7}} = \frac{y - 2}{-\dfrac{34}{7}} = \frac{z - 1}{\dfrac{12}{7}} 7 32 x − 1 = − 7 34 y − 2 = 7 12 z − 1
Why?
Use the point P and the direction ratios Q minus P:
39 7 − 1 = 32 7 − 20 7 − 2 = − 34 7 19 7 − 1 = 12 7 \begin{aligned} \frac{39}{7} - 1 &= \frac{32}{7} \\ -\frac{20}{7} - 2 &= -\frac{34}{7} \\ \frac{19}{7} - 1 &= \frac{12}{7} \end{aligned} 7 39 − 1 − 7 20 − 2 7 19 − 1 = 7 32 = − 7 34 = 7 12
(1 = 7 7 1 = \frac77 1 = 7 7 and 2 = 14 7 2 = \frac{14}{7} 2 = 7 14 , so − 20 7 − 14 7 = − 34 7 -\frac{20}{7} - \frac{14}{7} = -\frac{34}{7} − 7 20 − 7 14 = − 7 34 .)
Multiplying all three by 7 2 \frac72 2 7 gives the simpler direction ratios 16, − 17 -17 − 17 , 6. Direction ratios can be scaled freely.
32 7 × 7 2 = 32 2 = 16 − 34 7 × 7 2 = − 34 2 = − 17 12 7 × 7 2 = 12 2 = 6 \begin{aligned} \frac{32}{7} \times \frac72 &= \frac{32}{2} = 16 \\ -\frac{34}{7} \times \frac72 &= -\frac{34}{2} = -17 \\ \frac{12}{7} \times \frac72 &= \frac{12}{2} = 6 \end{aligned} 7 32 × 2 7 − 7 34 × 2 7 7 12 × 2 7 = 2 32 = 16 = − 2 34 = − 17 = 2 12 = 6
⇒ x − 1 16 = y − 2 − 17 = z − 1 6 \Rightarrow \dfrac{x - 1}{16} = \dfrac{y - 2}{-17} = \dfrac{z - 1}{6} ⇒ 16 x − 1 = − 17 y − 2 = 6 z − 1 .