Q31: If , prove
If then prove that .
Why?
Divide both sides of by . The aim is to free from the exponent, and a log does that next.
Why?
Take log on both sides and use two log rules:
Now there is no exponential left to differentiate.
On differentiating with respect to , we get
Why?
Left side, by the quotient rule with on top and below:
Right side: , and by the chain rule .
For the chain rule, the inside is , whose derivative is :
Why?
Multiply both sides by . Then , and .
Over the common denominator :
Expand , then the terms cancel:
Clearing the first keeps the second differentiation short.
On differentiating again with respect to , we get
Why?
Left side: is a product, so its derivative is . The derivative of is .
Right side, by the quotient rule:
with , , and .
Why?
The two terms cancel. On the right, .
Finally , which is the required form.
. Hence proved.
Chapter 5, Continuity and Differentiability: Second-order derivative: prove a relation.
Question type: Second derivative
How to spot it: click to see
Type 9. Second derivative: differentiate twice, then prove
Spot it: or in the question, often "prove that ".
Here: First take log, , and differentiate to get . Differentiate this again: the terms cancel, leaving .
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →
Continuity and Differentiability in past papers: question 29 of 35 · see them all