Q24: Prove if
If , then prove that
Let and . Then and , and , .
Why?
The roots and suggest putting , because
lies in , where . So the root is , not . The same holds for .
Why?
The left side is the expansion of a compound angle:
Put in , , , :
Their sum is . Then by the first line.
Both and lie in , so lies in . There the only angle with sine 1 is .
Differentiating w.r.t. ,
Why?
The standard derivative is
is a function of , so by the chain rule the derivative of carries an extra factor . The derivative of the constant is 0.
Why?
Move the first term to the right side, then multiply both sides by .
A quotient of two square roots is the square root of the quotient (for , ):
. Hence proved.
Chapter 5, Continuity and Differentiability: Derivative using an inverse trig substitution.
Question type: Implicit
How to spot it: click to see
Type 5. Implicit: and mixed in one equation
Spot it: an equation such as that you cannot easily solve for .
Here: and are mixed under roots. Put , : the left side is , so . Differentiate both sides; the term brings .
Quick lesson · Worked NCERT solutions · Interactive lesson
Also uses Chapter 2, Inverse Trigonometric Functions.
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →
Continuity and Differentiability in past papers: question 32 of 35 · see them all