Q29: divisible by 2 on : reflexive, symmetric, transitive, and
Check whether the relation R in the set Z of integers defined as
is reflexive, symmetric or transitive. Write the equivalence class containing 0 i.e. .
Reflexive: For every , , which is even. So for all .
Why?
Reflexive means every element is related to itself: for every , not just for some. "Divisible by 2" means "equal to 2 times an integer", and with an integer.
Hence R is reflexive.
Symmetric: Let . Then for some .
Why?
Symmetric means: whenever , also . Addition does not depend on the order, , so is the same multiple of 2.
Hence R is symmetric.
Transitive: Let and . Then, for some ,
Why?
Transitive means: and together give . So we must show that is a multiple of 2. Use two different letters, and , because the two multiples need not be equal.
Adding (i) and (ii),
Why?
Adding gives plus an extra . Moving to the right side: .
where . So .
Why?
Sums and differences of integers are integers, so is an integer and is divisible by 2.
Hence R is transitive.
So R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive. The integers related to 0 are those with even.
Why?
The equivalence class of 0 is the set of all integers related to 0:
, so itself must be even. Watch out: this includes 0 and the negative even integers too.
Chapter 1, Relations and Functions: Equivalence relation and an equivalence class.
Question type: Show that a relation is an equivalence relation + Equivalence classes (combines 2 types)
How to spot it: click to see
Type 3. Show that a relation is an equivalence relation
Spot it: the words "is an equivalence relation", often with "2 divides " or " is even".
Here: First, the rule is divisible by 2. For transitive, write and ; adding gives .
Type 4. Equivalence classes: everything related to one element
Spot it: "find the set of all elements related to 1", or "show that the elements of are related to each other".
Here: Then : put 0 in the rule, so must be even, and runs over all the even integers.
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →
Relations and Functions in past papers: question 18 of 18 · see them all