Q32: Prove , or at for a parametric curve
(a) If , then prove that .
OR
(b) If and , then find at .
(a)
Put and , so and . Then and .
Why?
The roots and suggest a sine substitution, because .
With , lies in , where . So , with no sign trouble. The same holds for .
Why?
Use the sum-to-product formulas on each side:
Both sides now share the factor .
Dividing both sides by (non-zero for ),
Why?
Cancelling and dividing by leaves on the left.
Divide both sides by :
Divide both sides by :
Then take of both sides and multiply by 2: .
The divisor is not zero. would need , so . would need , and then the given relation says , so again .
Why?
The key fact is that is a constant, since is a constant. When , is negative and equals . It is still a constant, so the derivative below is the same.
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. ,
Why?
The standard derivative is
For use the chain rule: depends on , so multiply by . The right side is a constant, so its derivative is .
Why?
Move the term to the other side, then multiply both sides by . Two square roots divide as one (for , ):
. Hence proved.
(b)
Why?
and are both given in terms of (parametric form), so differentiate each with respect to .
For , use the chain rule twice:
To simplify, write and in sines and cosines:
In detail, with and short names , :
Then , and .
Put the two terms over the common denominator :
Why?
For a parametric curve, divide the two derivatives:
Dividing by means multiplying by . One cancels, leaving .
Differentiating w.r.t. ,
Why?
is a function of . To differentiate it with respect to , differentiate with respect to and multiply by (chain rule). Here
Then , which gives .
Watch out: is not divided by .
At , and , so
Why?
, so . Also .
at .
Chapter 5, Continuity and Differentiability: Implicit, parametric and second derivatives.
Question type: (a) Implicit; (b) Parametric form + Second derivative (combined)
How to spot it: click to see
(a) Type 5. Implicit: and mixed in one equation
Spot it: an equation such as that you cannot easily solve for .
Here: and are mixed under two roots. Put , to reach , then differentiate both sides: the term brings .
(b) Type 8. Parametric form: and given through or
Spot it: two equations, one for and one for , both in the same third letter.
Here: First, and are both given in : and , so .
(b) Type 9. Second derivative: differentiate twice, then prove
Spot it: or in the question, often "prove that ".
Here: Then differentiate again with respect to : that gives . Put at the end.
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →
Continuity and Differentiability in past papers: question 6 of 35 · see them all