Q24: Show that for
If , then show that .
. Differentiating w.r.t. ,
Why?
is a bracket squared, so use the chain rule with :
Inside , the root needs the chain rule again:
(The outside part is , with derivative . The inside part is , with derivative . The 2 cancels.)
So the derivative of the bracket is
Why?
Write the second bracket as one fraction over :
The new numerator is the same as the first bracket . Spotting this is the key to the proof.
Why?
The two equal brackets multiply to a square, and that square is the given :
The target is written with , so writing the derivative in terms of is the right move.
Squaring both sides,
Why?
Multiplying by cleared the fraction. The target has the square of and no root, so now square both sides:
This is the required result, so the answer ends with "Hence proved".
. Hence proved.
Chapter 5, Continuity and Differentiability: Chain rule: show a derivative relation.
Question type: The chain rule
How to spot it: click to see
Type 4. The chain rule: a function inside a function
Spot it: something other than a plain inside , , , or a power, like or .
Here: is the square of , and that bracket holds a root of : differentiate the square, times the derivative of the bracket, . This simplifies to ; then square.
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear. Send feedback on this question →
Continuity and Differentiability in past papers: question 12 of 35 · see them all