Exercise 9.2 · Q7: solves
In each of the Exercises 1 to 10 verify that the given functions (explicit or implicit) is a solution of the corresponding differential equation:
7. :
Given . Differentiating both sides with respect to ,
Multiplying by ,
Dividing by (as ),
which is the given differential equation.
is a solution of the given differential equation. Hence verified.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Here the solution is given implicitly: a relation between and , not a formula . To verify it, differentiate the relation with respect to , treating as a function of (so every -term picks up a factor ), then rearrange until the given equation appears. The constant disappears on differentiation.
- Given
- The relation , with an arbitrary constant; the equation , with .
- To show
- That every differentiable satisfying the relation satisfies the equation.
- Plan
- (1) Note the domain ( needs ). (2) Differentiate implicitly. (3) Clear the fraction and collect . (4) Divide by . (5) Conclude, with the role of .
Basics you need
When is a function of given by a relation, differentiate both sides with respect to ; a function of gives its derivative times (Section 5.3.2). Basics: y′ and y″
Exercise 9.2 asks to verify functions "explicit or implicit": a relation whose satisfies the equation is a solution. Lesson: general and particular solutions
Solution
The domain
is defined only for , so we work where . The equation itself needs .
Every log, root and division in the working limits where it is valid. Writing the limits first means each later step can be checked against them.Differentiate both sides with respect to
On the left, is a product, so the product rule gives . On the right, is a function of , which is a function of , so the chain rule gives . The constant gives 0.Implicit differentiation (Section 5.3.2). Basics: y′ and y″Clear the fraction and collect
Multiply both sides by (allowed, ):
Multiplying by removes the denominator. Then move the terms to one side and take out as a common factor.Rearranging an equation to make the subject. Lesson: is it a solution?Divide by
This is exactly the given differential equation, so L.H.S. = R.H.S.
Dividing needs , which is the condition printed in the question. At points with , Step 3 would read , impossible for , so the relation has no differentiable through such a point.Section 9.3: the function satisfies the equation. Lesson: is it a solution?Conclusion, and the constant
Wherever and , a function defined by satisfies . Hence verified.
The equation has order 1 and degree 1 (after multiplying by it is , a polynomial equation in of power 1). The relation has one arbitrary constant , as many as the order, so it is a general solution. Each value of picks one curve: for example the curve through has .
The constant was never used in Steps 2 to 4, so the check works for every member of the family at once.General solution: as many arbitrary constants as the order (Section 9.3 and the Summary). Basics: order n gives n constants
Differentiating gives , so and for , . Hence is a solution (a general solution, one constant) of the given equation. (The answer key gives no answer for this question, since it is a verification.)
Take the curve through , : . There , and the equation gives
Solving for numerically near : and , so
the slope the equation predicts.
- Differentiating as or as only. It is a product: .
- Writing without the factor .
- Dividing by without stating .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| defined for ; | Steps 1, 2 | Chapter 5, Section 5.4 |
| Product rule; chain rule; implicit differentiation | Step 2 | Chapter 5, Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 (Basics) |
| A solution makes L.H.S. = R.H.S. when substituted | Step 4 | Section 9.3 (Lesson) |
| Order and degree (polynomial condition) | Step 5 | Sections 9.2.1 and 9.2.2 (Lesson) |
| General solution has as many constants as the order | Step 5 | Section 9.3 and the Summary of Chapter 9 (Basics) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →