Miscellaneous · Q35:
Prove that
Let .
Put . Then .
When , ; when , .
Swapping the limits removes the minus sign:
. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
An odd power of sine can be split as one times an even power, and the even power can be written in cosines: . The single together with is (minus) the differential of , so the substitution turns the integral into a polynomial in .
- Given
- .
- To show
- .
- Plan
- (1) Continuity. (2) Split off one and use . (3) Substitute , change the limits. (4) Integrate the polynomial. (5) Check the antiderivative by differentiating. (6) Cross-check with the triple-angle identity.
Basics you need
With , ; the limits become and . Basics: substitution
(Section 7.10, P1). It absorbs the minus sign of . Lesson: properties of definite integrals
, so . Basics: trigonometric identities
Solution
The integrand is continuous on
is a power of the continuous function , so it is continuous everywhere, and Theorem 2 of Section 7.8.3 applies.
Every definite integral starts with this check; here nothing can fail.Split off one
We want the integrand to look like "a function of " times "the derivative of ". The derivative of is , so we keep one aside for the differential and convert the remaining even power into cosines. This works for any odd power of sine.Substitute and change the limits
Put , so , that is . At , ; at , . Then
The second line uses P1: swapping the limits changes the sign, which cancels the minus from . The substitution is valid on the whole interval: is differentiable and decreasing on (its derivative ), so it maps onto once, running backwards.Section 7.9; P1, Section 7.10. Lesson: integration by substitutionIntegrate the polynomial
This is the required result.
Power rule (standard formula (i), Section 7.2) and Theorem 2. Size check: rises from 0 to 1 on , an interval of length about 1.571, and stays small for a while (since cubing shrinks numbers below 1), so an area of about 0.667, less than half of , is reasonable.Check: the antiderivative in
Back in , . Differentiate:
valid for every real . Evaluating it directly: at it is ; at it is ; difference ✓.
The indefinite integral in is , which carries the minus sign. The chain rule on gives .Cross-check with the triple-angle identity
From : . So
The two antiderivatives are in fact identical: using ,
This is the method of Section 7.3.2 (integration using trigonometric identities). and . A second, independent method that gives the same number is strong evidence that the proof is right.
as was to be proved.
Numerical integration (adaptive quadrature) of over gives 0.6666666667, and ✓.
Identity spot check at : , and ✓.
- Writing . The power rule needs the derivative of the inside, , as a factor, and it is not there.
- Losing the minus sign of , which gives .
- Not changing the limits: with the lower limit becomes 1 and the upper limit 0.
- Odd power of : keep one for , write the rest in , put . (For an odd power of , swap the roles.)
- (the second by P4).
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| A definite integral needs continuous on | Step 1 | Theorem 2 and Remark (iv), Section 7.8.3 |
| Step 2 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI) | |
| Substitution with changed limits; P1 | Step 3 | Section 7.9; Section 7.10, P1 |
| Power rule; Theorem 2 | Step 4 | Standard formula (i), Section 7.2; Section 7.8.3 |
| , | Step 6 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI); method of Section 7.3.2 |
| P4 (take-away) | Take-away | Section 7.10, P4 |
| All decimals | Check | Recomputed (mpmath quadrature, 30 digits) in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →