Miscellaneous · Q28:
Evaluate the definite integral
Let .
Multiplying numerator and denominator by ,
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
A difference of two square roots in a denominator is removed by multiplying by its conjugate, the sum of the same roots. Here the result is spectacular: . So the awkward fraction is simply , two powers that the power rule integrates at once.
- Given
- .
- To find
- The exact value of , and a decimal.
- Plan
- (1) Check the integrand is defined and continuous on . (2) Rationalise the denominator. (3) Find an antiderivative with the power rule. (4) Check it by differentiating. (5) Apply Theorem 2 and simplify.
Basics you need
. With , this is . Basics: splitting fractions
for (standard formula (i), Section 7.2). With : . Basics: powers of x and the power rule
: put , . Basics: substitution
If is continuous on and , then (Theorem 2, Section 7.8.3). Lesson: definite integrals
Solution
The integrand is continuous on
Both roots are defined for . Since and the square root is increasing,
so the denominator is always positive and never zero. Hence the integrand is continuous on (at from the right, which is all a closed interval needs).
Theorem 2 needs continuity on the closed interval. A difference in a denominator could vanish, so we must rule that out before doing anything else. Here it cannot: a larger number has a larger square root.Rationalise: multiply by the conjugate
Multiply the numerator and the denominator by , which is positive:
Multiplying top and bottom by the same non-zero number leaves a fraction unchanged. We pick the conjugate because the difference of squares makes both square roots disappear from the denominator. Here even the disappears, leaving 1. That is why the method fits this question so well: no fraction is left at all.Find an antiderivative with the power rule
Call .
The integral of a sum is the sum of the integrals (Section 7.2.1). Each term is a power with : raise the power by 1 to and divide by the new power , that is, multiply by . For the substitution has , so the shift changes nothing in the rule.Standard formula (i), Section 7.2, with . Basics: powers of x and the power ruleCheck: differentiate back
This is the rationalised integrand, which equals the original one by Step 2 ✓. It holds for every .
Differentiating the answer back confirms both the power rule and the factor . The chain rule factor from is .Apply Theorem 2 and simplify
.
.
As a decimal, .
. The two terms cancel: one comes from at , the other from at . Size check: by Step 2 the integrand rises from at to at , so the integral over an interval of length 1 must lie between 1 and 2.414. It does.Theorem 2, Section 7.8.3. Lesson: definite integrals
(Textbook answer: .)
Numerical integration (adaptive quadrature) of the original integrand over gives 1.8856180832, and ✓.
Rationalising at : , and ✓.
- Splitting the fraction as . A fraction cannot be split over a difference in its denominator.
- Multiplying only the denominator by the conjugate. Top and bottom must both be multiplied, or the value changes.
- Dropping because there. The other term, , is at , not 0.
- A denominator becomes after multiplying by . When is a constant, the fraction disappears.
- Always evaluate every term of at both limits; a term that vanishes at one limit may not vanish at the other.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| A definite integral needs continuous on | Step 1 | Theorem 2 and Remark (iv), Section 7.8.3 |
| Step 2 | Algebraic identities (earlier classes) | |
| Step 3 | Property (III), Section 7.2.1 | |
| , | Step 3 | Standard formula (i), Section 7.2 |
| Step 5 | Theorem 2, Section 7.8.3 (Lesson: definite integrals) | |
| All decimals | Step 5, Check | Recomputed (mpmath quadrature, 30 digits) in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →