Example 16:
Find
Let .
Let
Putting : , so .
Comparing coefficients of : , so .
Comparing constant terms: , so .
In the second integral put . Then .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The factor cannot be split into real linear factors (it is never zero). Over such a quadratic the partial fraction needs a linear top, , not just a constant (Table 7.2, row 5). Then the piece itself splits in two: the part is a multiple of , whose top is the derivative of its bottom (a logarithm), and the constant part is (an inverse tangent).
- Given
- , defined for every real except (since ).
- To find
- Its indefinite integral.
- Plan
- (1) Check it is proper and write the form from Table 7.2, row 5. (2) Find , , . (3) Split into a log part and a part. (4) Integrate. (5) Differentiate back.
Basics you need
Table 7.2, row 5: is written as , when cannot be factorised further. Basics: splitting fractions
With , : (Section 7.3.1). Basics: substitution
Standard formula (x): . Basics: integration undoes differentiation
Solution
Choose the form of the partial fractions
The top has degree 2 and the bottom has degree 3, so the fraction is proper. The factor has no real roots (its discriminant is ), so it cannot be factorised further. By Table 7.2, row 5,
Multiplying by :
A quadratic bottom allows a top of degree up to 1, so the general top is . Writing only would leave too few constants to match a top of degree 2. (At this point the book's text cites "Table 2.2(5)". The form it then uses is row 5 of Table 7.2, the table of partial fractions in Section 7.5 of this chapter.)Find , and
The right side expands to . Equating coefficients with :
Put in the identity: , so and . Then and . The third equation checks: . So
Substituting kills the term and gives at once; the other two follow from the simpler equations. The unused equation is a free check on all three values.An identity between polynomials holds for every , so we may compare coefficients or substitute values. Basics: splitting fractionsRewrite the quadratic piece
The derivative of is , and conveniently the top is . So we split it as (top = derivative of bottom, a log) plus (a standard inverse tangent).Integrate the three pieces
For the middle piece put , : . So
Since , .
Three different standard results: a shifted (log), a top-is-derivative-of-bottom fraction (log), and (inverse tangent). The book keeps the bars, ; they are harmless but unnecessary.Formulae (xii) and (x), and substitution (Section 7.3.1). Lesson: substitutionCheck: differentiate the answer
, and the factor 5 cancels: the derivative is exactly the integrand.
valid for . This is the book's answer (the book writes , which is the same thing because ).
At a point. At : the integrand is ; the derivative of our answer is .
Over an interval. On :
Numerical integration over gives , the same.
- A constant top over the quadratic. Over the top must be .
- Integrating in one go. Split it: gives a log, gives .
- Writing for . That integral is ; the log needs on top.
- Irreducible quadratic factor linear top in its partial fraction.
- Split into a "derivative of the bottom" part (log) and a constant part (inverse tangent).
- Substituting the root of the linear factor gives its constant immediately.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Form | Steps 1, 2 | Table 7.2, row 5, Section 7.5 (Lesson: partial fractions) |
| Discriminant test for real factors | Step 1 | Quadratic equations (Class X/XI) |
| Equal polynomials have equal coefficients | Step 2 | Algebra (Class XI) |
| Substitution | Step 4 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: substitution) |
| ; | Step 4 | Standard formulae (xii) and (x), Section 7.2 |
| Derivatives of and ; chain rule | Step 5 | Section 7.2; Chapter 5 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →