Example 12:
Find
Let .
Dividing by ,
Let
Putting : , so . Putting : .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The top and the bottom have the same degree (both are quadratics), so the fraction is improper. An improper fraction always hides a whole-number part, exactly as . So we divide first: the integrand becomes plus a proper fraction. The proper fraction has a bottom that factorises into two different linear factors, so it splits into , and each of those integrates to a logarithm.
- Given
- The integrand . Its bottom is zero at and , so it is defined for every real except and .
- To find
- , and where the answer is valid.
- Plan
- (1) Factorise the bottom. (2) Divide, because the fraction is improper. (3) Write the proper part as . (4) Find and . (5) Integrate term by term. (6) Differentiate the answer to check it.
Basics you need
A rational function is proper when the degree of is less than the degree of , and improper otherwise. An improper one can be written as a polynomial plus a proper one by long division (Section 7.5). Basics: splitting fractions
Table 7.2, row 1: when , with real numbers , to be found. Basics: splitting fractions
Standard formula (xii): . With the substitution (so ) it gives . Basics: logarithms and 1/x
Property V (Section 7.2.1): the integral of a sum of constant multiples is the same sum of constant multiples of the integrals. And because integration undoes differentiation, any answer can be checked by differentiating it. Basics: integration undoes differentiation
Solution
Factorise the bottom and note where the integrand lives
We need two numbers with product and sum : they are and . So
The integrand is therefore defined for all real except and .
Partial fractions are built from the factors of the bottom, so factorising is always the first job. Knowing where the bottom is zero also tells us in advance where the final answer can be valid: nowhere near or can the integral be taken across.The fraction is improper, so divide first
The top and the bottom both have degree 2, so the fraction is not proper. Dividing by : the quotient is , and the remainder is
So
Table 7.2 only applies to proper fractions. If we tried directly, the left side has an term and the right side cannot produce one, so no , would work. Division removes the whole-number part and leaves a remainder of degree 1, lower than the degree 2 of the bottom.Dividend = quotient × divisor + remainder, with the remainder of lower degree than the divisor. Here . Lesson: partial fractionsSet up the partial fractions
The bottom has two different linear factors, so by Table 7.2, row 1, we write
Multiply both sides by :
Multiplying through clears every denominator and leaves an equation between two polynomials. It has to hold for every (it is an identity, not an equation to solve), and that is what lets us find and in the next step.Two polynomials that are equal for every have equal coefficients of each power of . Basics: splitting fractionsFind and
Expand the right side:
Equating the coefficients of and the constant terms with those of :
From the first, . Then , so and
Quick cross-check. Put in : , so . Put : . The same values. Hence
Comparing coefficients is the book's method. Substituting the roots and is a fast independent check: each choice makes one bracket zero and leaves a single unknown. (This is legitimate even though the original fraction is undefined at 2 and 3: the two sides of are polynomials that agree at every other , and two polynomials that agree at infinitely many points are identical, so they agree at 2 and 3 as well.)Integrate term by term
By Property V,
For , substitute , : it becomes by formula (xii), that is . In the same way . Therefore
After the split, every piece is a standard integral: , and each is a shifted . The absolute value bars matter: is negative for , and the log of a negative number is not defined, but is.Standard formula (xii), , with a linear substitution. Basics: logarithms and 1/xCheck: differentiate the answer
Using (for ):
Over the common denominator the top is
So the derivative is , exactly the integrand.
An antiderivative is, by definition, a function whose derivative is the integrand. Differentiating back is therefore a complete check, and it catches sign slips in or at once.
valid for , that is on each of the intervals , and . This is the book's answer.
At a point. At the integrand is , and the derivative of our answer is .
Over an interval. On (which avoids 2 and 3), our answer gives
Adding up the integrand numerically over gives , the same value.
- Skipping the division. Partial fractions of the improper fraction directly cannot work, and the term in the answer would be lost.
- Dropping the absolute value. Write , not , unless you know .
- Sign slips in the constant term. has constant term , not .
- Using the answer across or . The integrand is undefined there; the formula holds on each interval separately.
- If the degree of the top is at least the degree of the bottom, divide first.
- For distinct linear factors, substituting each root into the cleared identity gives each constant in one line.
- Every piece integrates to . Always differentiate the answer back.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Proper and improper rational functions; division | Step 2 | Section 7.5 (Lesson: partial fractions) |
| Steps 3, 4 | Table 7.2, row 1, Section 7.5 | |
| Equal polynomials have equal coefficients | Step 4 | Algebra (Class XI) |
| Integral of a sum of multiples (Property V) | Step 5 | Section 7.2.1 |
| ; | Step 5 | Standard formulae (xii) and (i), Section 7.2 |
| Substitution | Step 5 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: substitution) |
| Step 6 | Section 7.2 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →