Example 2: , ,
Find the following integrals:
(i) (ii) (iii)
(i) Let .
.
(ii) Let .
.
(iii) Let .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Integration is linear: the integral of a sum is the sum of the integrals, and constant factors come outside (Property V of Section 7.2.1). So the work is to rewrite each integrand as a sum of pieces that are on the list of standard formulae: powers with , , and . Each piece is then integrated on its own, and all the separate constants are collected into a single .
- Given
- Three integrands: (i) , ; (ii) ; (iii) , which needs .
- To find
- The indefinite integral of each.
- Plan
- (1) Split into standard pieces; (2) apply formula (i) , , and formulae (xi), (xii) for and ; (3) merge the constants; (4) differentiate the answer back.
Basics you need
for every real : add 1 to the power, divide by the new power. It works for negative and fractional too. Basics: powers of x and the power rule
, , and . Rewriting a fraction as powers is what makes formula (i) usable. Basics: powers of x
and , (Example 1(iii)). Basics: logarithms and 1/x
Part (i):
Split the fraction into powers of
For , divide each term of the numerator by :
There is no formula for a quotient, but there is one for each power of . A fraction with a single term in the denominator can always be split term by term, because . The condition is needed for the integrand to exist at all.Index laws. Basics: splitting fractionsIntegrate term by term
By Property V, . Use formula (i) with and (neither is ):
For : the new power is , and we divide by , giving . Each integral brings its own constant; the book writes them as and to make the point that they are independent.Standard formula (i), Section 7.2; Property V, Section 7.2.1. Basics: the power ruleSubtract and merge the constants
is just another arbitrary constant; call it . So
Subtracting gives : watch this sign. Since and can each be any real number, so can , and nothing is lost by writing a single . From here on the book writes only one constant in the final answer.Note after Example 2(i) in the book. Lesson: integration as anti-differentiationCheck: differentiate the answer
. Putting the two terms over the common denominator returns the original integrand, valid for every .
Part (ii):
Split and integrate each term
Formula (i) with : the new power is , so
and (the special case ).
Dividing by the fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal . The "1" in the integrand is , and .Standard formula (i) and , Section 7.2. Basics: the power ruleWrite the answer with one constant
Reading as , the integrand is defined for every real , and the answer holds for every real .
Cube roots exist for negative numbers, so and make sense for all . The check in the next step works at negative as well (it is tested at below).Check: differentiate the answer
For example at : , so the integrand is , and the derivative formula gives the same .
The power rule brings down the factor , which cancels the exactly. This cancellation is why we divided by the new power.
Part (iii):
Where the integrand exists
needs , and needs . So we work on .
An answer is only meaningful where the integrand is defined. Here the square root rules out negative , and the rules out 0.Domains of powers and of . Basics: powers of xSplit into three standard integrals
Property V lets us split the sum and take the constant 2 outside its integral. Each of the three pieces is now on the list of standard formulae.Property V, Section 7.2.1. Lesson: integration as anti-differentiationApply formulae (i), (xi) and (xii)
Therefore
, and dividing by means multiplying by . is its own derivative, so it is its own anti derivative. The term is the exception of the power formula and gives a logarithm. Since here, ; the book keeps the modulus to match formula (xii).Standard formulae (i), (xi), (xii), Section 7.2. Basics: logarithms and 1/xCheck: differentiate the answer
Each term differentiates back to the term it came from, which is exactly what term-by-term integration promised.
(i) , .
(ii) .
(iii) , .
These agree with the textbook's solution.
For any anti derivative , the area-type sum equals (Section 7.8). The middle column is computed by a computer adding very many thin strips, without using our answers:
| Part | Interval | Sum of thin strips | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (i) | |||
| (ii) | |||
| (iii) |
In (ii), . In (iii), .
- Integrating a quotient as "integral over integral". is not . Split the fraction first.
- Sign slip with . , so subtracting it gives .
- Multiplying by the new power instead of dividing. is , not .
- Using formula (i) for . is excluded; the answer is .
- Rewrite first (split fractions, turn roots into fractional powers), integrate second.
- Power rule for integrals: raise the power by 1 and divide by the new power, for every .
- Several constants of integration always combine into one arbitrary .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| , ; | All parts | Standard formula (i), Section 7.2 |
| Part (iii), Step 3 | Standard formula (xi), Section 7.2 | |
| Part (iii), Step 3 | Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2; Example 1(iii) | |
| Integral of a sum, constant multiples | All parts | Properties (III) to (V), Section 7.2.1 (Lesson: integration as anti-differentiation) |
| One constant for the final answer | Part (i), Step 3 | Note after Example 2(i) |
| Index laws , | Part (i), Step 1 | Laws of exponents (Basics: powers of x) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →