Exercise 7.5 · Q21:
Integrate the function
[Hint: Put .]
Let .
Put . Then , so .
Let . Then .
Putting : . Putting : .
.
The answer key prints , without the modulus. This agrees for ; for the bracket is negative, so the modulus is needed.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
With we have , so . The integral becomes , a rational function in with two different linear factors, which splits by Table 7.2 (row 1).
- Given
- The integrand , defined for (since only at ).
- To find
- .
- Plan
- (1) Put . (2) Split . (3) Integrate and return to . (4) Look at the sign of on each side of 0 and compare with the textbook's form. (5) Differentiate back.
Basics you need
(standard formula (xi), Section 7.2); for all ; exactly when ; . Basics: logarithms and 1/x
If then . Basics: substitution
Solution
Substitute
Then , so (allowed since ). Hence
with , .
There is no in the numerator to absorb , so we solve for . This brings an extra factor into the denominator and gives a rational function of .Integration by substitution, Section 7.3.1. Lesson: substitutionSplit into partial fractions
Put : . Put : . So
Two different linear factors: row 1 of Table 7.2. Check at : . ✓Table 7.2, row 1. Basics: splitting fractionsIntegrate and return to
Dividing top and bottom by , this is also .
Each simple fraction gives a logarithm (standard formula (xii)); combine with ; then .Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2. Basics: logarithms and 1/xThe modulus matters for
For : , so and the answer may be written , the textbook's form.
For : , so . Its logarithm is not defined, and the answer must be written with the modulus: .
The integrand is defined for too (for example, at it is ), so an answer valid only for is incomplete. The textbook's answer omits the modulus, so it covers only ; with the same expression covers every .Logarithms are defined only for positive numbers. Basics: logarithms and 1/xCheck: differentiate the answer
Write the answer as . Then
Valid for every , on both sides of 0.
Chain rule on (inner derivative ); . Over the common denominator the terms cancel.Property (I), Section 7.2.1. Basics: integration undoes differentiation
for . (Textbook answer: . This agrees with ours for ; for the bracket is negative, so the modulus is needed, as shown in Step 4.)
From 1 to 2 (continuous there): . A numerical integration over gives too. ✓
From to , where the modulus is needed: . A numerical integration over gives too. ✓
- Writing . With , , so .
- Answer . The numerator is 1, not (the derivative of the denominator), so this is wrong: its derivative is .
- Dropping the modulus everywhere. for .
- For integrands in , with gives a rational function of .
- A second route: multiply by to get , whose numerator is the derivative of ; this gives at once.
- Keep the modulus unless the quantity is known to be positive on the whole domain.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ; substitution | Step 1 | Standard formula (xi), Section 7.2; Section 7.3.1 |
| Step 2 | Table 7.2, row 1, Section 7.5 | |
| Step 3 | Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2 | |
| ; needs a positive argument | Step 4 | Exponential and logarithmic functions (Basics: logarithms) |
| Step 5 | Laws of logarithms | |
| Derivative of an antiderivative is the integrand | Step 5 | Property (I), Section 7.2.1 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →