Exercise 7.2 · Q30:
Integrate the function (Exercise 7.2, "Integrate the functions in Exercises 1 to 37"):
Let .
Put . Then .
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The derivative of the denominator is , which is the numerator up to a minus sign. So the fraction is "minus (derivative of the bottom) over (the bottom)", and such a fraction integrates to a logarithm: with , the integral is .
- Given
- .
- To find
- , and where the answer is valid.
- Plan
- (1) Find where is defined. (2) Substitute , so . (3) Integrate . (4) Return to and see that the modulus can be dropped. (5) Differentiate back, and compare with a second route through .
Basics you need
If , then . Basics: substitution (the chain rule backwards)
and (used only in the second route). Basics: trigonometric identities
Solution
Where is the integrand defined?
The denominator must not be zero: , that is, , that is,
Since always, at every other point . So on the domain the denominator is positive.
This positivity will matter in Step 4: it lets us drop the modulus in . Knowing the sign of what goes into a logarithm is always worth a line.Substitute
Put . Then
The integral becomes
The numerator is, apart from the sign, the differential of the denominator. The minus sign comes from ; it is easy to lose, so we write explicitly before replacing anything.This is the same idea the book uses for in Section 7.3.1 (put , ). Lesson: integration by substitutionIntegrate
The power rule fails for ; the integral of is the logarithm of . The modulus makes the formula valid for negative too.Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2. Basics: logarithms and 1/xReturn to ; the modulus is harmless
By Step 1, on the whole domain, so , and the answer may equally be written .
The textbook keeps the modulus, which is never wrong. Here it changes nothing, because the quantity inside is already positive wherever the integrand exists.Check: differentiate the answer back
Let . Chain rule, outer , inner :
This is the integrand. ✓
Differentiating back is the definition of an antiderivative (Property (I), Section 7.2.1). The two minus signs cancel, which confirms that the sign in Step 2 was handled correctly.A second route through , and why it agrees
Using the half-angle identities,
With , , and (Section 7.3.1):
This equals our answer up to a constant:
Two correct methods can give answers that look different; they must then differ by a constant (Property (II), Section 7.2.1). Here the difference is , which is absorbed into . Seeing that both routes agree is a strong check.
valid wherever ; there , so this is also . (Textbook answer: .)
Take and :
- and ,
- slope (that is, over ),
- integrand: , and too. ✓
- Losing the minus sign. ; the answer is , not .
- Using the power rule on . It would give , which is meaningless; the case is exactly the one that gives a logarithm.
- Thinking the two routes disagree. and differ by the constant ; both are correct.
- : whenever the numerator is the derivative of the denominator (up to a constant), expect a logarithm.
- Check the sign of what is inside the log; sometimes the modulus can be dropped.
- Different-looking answers are both right when they differ by a constant.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ; at odd multiples of | Step 1 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI, Chapter 3) |
| Substitution: , | Step 2 | Section 7.3.1 (Lesson: substitution) |
| Step 3 | Standard formula (xii), Section 7.2 | |
| Step 6 | Section 7.3.1, standard integral (i) | |
| , | Step 6 | Trigonometric functions (Class XI, Chapter 3) |
| Antiderivatives with the same derivative differ by a constant | Step 6 | Property (II), Section 7.2.1 |
| Chain rule; checks the answer | Step 5 | Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1; Property (I), Section 7.2.1 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →