Exercise 7.1 · Q13:
Find the following integral:
Let .
Cancelling (as ),
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The denominator has two terms, so we cannot split the fraction term by term. Instead we factor the numerator: grouping gives . The factor cancels (wherever ), and what is left, , is a plain polynomial that the power formula integrates at once.
- Given
- The integrand .
- To find
- .
- Plan
- (1) Note where is defined. (2) Factor the numerator by grouping and cancel . (3) Integrate the polynomial term by term. (4) Differentiate the answer to check it.
Basics you need
Pair the terms so that each pair shares a factor, take it out, and look for a common bracket: and . Basics: splitting and simplifying fractions
is true only when : we may never divide by zero. Basics: splitting fractions
, (formula (i), Section 7.2); . Basics: powers of x and the power rule
Solution
Where is the integrand defined?
The denominator is zero at , so the integrand is defined for every real except 1:
We need this before cancelling anything. It also tells us the answer will be valid on the two intervals and .The Note in Section 7.2: the interval on which a function is defined must be kept in mind in every problem.Factor the numerator by grouping
We look for the factor because it is the denominator: if it divides the numerator, the fraction collapses to a polynomial. The first pair has the common factor ; after taking it out, both pairs contain , which then comes out of the whole sum. Expanding confirms the factorisation.Another way to see that is a factor: the numerator is 0 at (), so by the factor theorem divides it. Long division gives the same quotient with remainder 0.Cancel
For ,
Cancelling is division of top and bottom by , which is allowed precisely because on the domain found in Step 1. So on its domain the integrand is the function ; the only difference is a single missing point at (the figure below).Simplifying the integrand before integrating is the main tool of this exercise. Basics: splitting fractionsIntegrate term by term
Property III lets us integrate a sum one term at a time. Formula (i) with gives ; with it gives . The constants of the two parts are combined into one .Formula (i), Section 7.2, and its special case . Basics: the power ruleCheck: differentiate the answer back
The derivative is the integrand at every point of its domain, so the answer is correct.
The last equality is Step 3 read backwards, and it needs . So the answer is an antiderivative on and on . Strictly, since the domain has two pieces, the constant could even be chosen differently on each piece; like the textbook, we write a single .Property I, Section 7.2.1: differentiation undoes integration. Basics: integration undoes differentiation
For ,
(Textbook answer: .)
At the integrand is , and too, as Step 3 says. With : and , so the slope of at 3 is about
It matches the integrand value 10.
(Each value of is rounded to 8 decimal places, so the slope is reliable to about 4 decimal places.)
- Splitting over a two-term denominator. is not . Only a single-term denominator can be divided into each term.
- Grouping signs wrongly. is not . Group as .
- Forgetting . The cancellation, and so the answer, holds only away from .
- Writing or . The integral of the constant 1 is .
- When the denominator has several terms, try to factor the numerator and cancel; test a candidate factor by substituting .
- A cancelled factor leaves a hole in the domain; state it with the answer.
- Differentiate back to check: .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Keep the interval of definition in mind | Steps 1, 5 | Note after the list of formulae, Section 7.2 |
| Step 2 | Factoring by grouping; factor theorem (earlier classes) | |
| for | Step 3 | Arithmetic of fractions (no division by zero) |
| ; | Step 4 | Formula (i), Section 7.2 |
| Step 4 | Property III, Section 7.2.1 (Lesson: integration as anti-differentiation) | |
| Step 5 | Property I, Section 7.2.1 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →