Since l,m,n,a,b,c are constants, differentiating w.r.t. x,
dxdy=f′(x)(mc−nb)−g′(x)(lc−na)+h′(x)(lb−ma)
This is the expansion along R1 of the determinant with first row f′(x),g′(x),h′(x).
∴dxdy=f′(x)lag′(x)mbh′(x)nc. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The one idea this problem is built on
Expand the determinant along the first row. Each of f(x),g(x),h(x) gets multiplied by a 2×2 determinant built only from the constants l,m,n,a,b,c. So y is just "constant times f" plus "constant times g" plus "constant times h", and differentiating simply puts a prime on f,g and h. Reading the result backwards, it is the expansion of the second determinant.
Given, to show, and the plan
Given
f,g,h are differentiable functions of x;l,m,n,a,b,c are constants (here a,b,c are just names for the entries of the third row).
To show
dxdy equals the same determinant with the first row replaced by f′(x),g′(x),h′(x).
Plan
(1) Expand y along the first row. (2) Note the cofactors are constants. (3) Differentiate term by term. (4) Recognise the result as a determinant.
Basics you need
1Expanding a 3×3 determinant along the first row
Each first-row entry times the 2×2 determinant left after deleting its row and column, with signs +,−,+ (Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3):
plaqmbrnc=pmbnc−qlanc+rlamb.
22×2 determinants
Product of the main diagonal minus product of the other diagonal (Chapter 4, Section 4.2.2):
mbnc=mc−nb.
3Sum and constant multiple rules
(u±v)′=u′±v′ (Section 5.3, rule (1)), and (ku)′=ku′ for a constant k (rule (2) with k′=0). Basics: derivative rules
Solution
Expand y along the first row
y=f(x)mbnc−g(x)lanc+h(x)lamb.
Evaluating the 2×2 determinants:
y=f(x)(mc−nb)−g(x)(lc−na)+h(x)(lb−ma).
Expanding along the first row puts the three functions outside the small determinants. Each 2×2 determinant is what is left after deleting the row and column of that entry, and the signs follow the pattern +,−,+.
Determinant of order 3, expansion along R1 (Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3; Basics 1, 2).
The three multipliers are constants
Write A1=mc−nb,A2=−(lc−na),A3=lb−ma. Then
y=A1f(x)+A2g(x)+A3h(x),
where A1,A2,A3 do not depend on x.
They are built only from l,m,n,a,b,c, which are constants. (They are the cofactors of the first-row entries.) This is the key point: y is a sum of constant multiples of f,g and h.
Cofactors (Chapter 4, Section 4.4).
Differentiate term by term
Since f,g,h are differentiable and A1,A2,A3 are constants,
dxdy=A1f′(x)+A2g′(x)+A3h′(x),
that is,
dxdy=f′(x)(mc−nb)−g′(x)(lc−na)+h′(x)(lb−ma).
The sum rule lets us differentiate each term separately; the constant multiple rule keeps each Ai in front. No product rule is needed, because the other factor in each product is constant.
Step 3's expression is exactly the first-row expansion (Basic 1) of the determinant whose first row is f′(x),g′(x),h′(x) and whose other rows are unchanged:
dxdy=f′(x)lag′(x)mbh′(x)nc.
Expanding this new determinant along its first row gives f′(x)(mc−nb)−g′(x)(lc−na)+h′(x)(lb−ma), because its second and third rows, and so its cofactors A1,A2,A3, are the same as before. The two expressions are identical, which completes the proof.
Expansion along R1 read in reverse (Chapter 4, Section 4.2.3).
Result
For differentiable f,g,h and constants l,m,n,a,b,c:
since both sides equal f′(x)(mc−nb)−g′(x)(lc−na)+h′(x)(lb−ma).
Check it with numbers
Take f=sinx,g=x2,h=ex, second row 2,−1,3, third row 1,4,5. The cofactors are mc−nb=−5−12=−17, lc−na=10−3=7,lb−ma=8+1=9, so
y=−17sinx−7x2+9ex.
At x=0.5:y≈4.9382573, and dxdy=−17cosx−14x+9ex≈−7.0804121. The determinant with first row cos0.5,1,e0.5 also evaluates to ≈−7.0804121, and a numerical derivative of y (h=0.0001) agrees. ✓
Common mistakes
Differentiating every entry. The constant rows would become rows of zeros and the determinant would be 0. Only the row containing functions is differentiated.
Sign errors in the expansion: the middle term carries a minus sign, −g(x)(lc−na).
Calling a,b,c variables. In this question they are constant entries.
What to take away
A determinant is a sum of products of entries, one from each row. If only one row depends on x, the determinant is a linear combination of that row's entries with constant coefficients, so differentiating that row is enough.
More generally, if several rows depend on x, applying the product rule to each product in the full expansion gives the derivative as a sum of determinants, each with one row differentiated (not needed here).
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →