Miscellaneous · Q14: Solve as , so
If , for , prove that
Here . Squaring both sides,
does not satisfy the given equation (it gives , true only at ). So , and as ,
Differentiating w.r.t. by the quotient rule,
. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The relation can be solved for . Moving one term across and squaring removes the roots and gives an equation that factorises as . Squaring can create false solutions, so each factor must be tested in the original equation: fails (except at the origin), and works. Then the quotient rule finishes the job.
- Given
- , with (and , so that exists).
- To show
- .
- Plan
- (1) Isolate one root term and square. (2) Factorise. (3) Test both factors in the original equation. (4) Differentiate . (5) Confirm by implicit differentiation.
Basics you need
If then , but only gives . So every solution of the squared equation must be checked in the original one. Basics: solving for dy/dx
, and a common factor can be taken out of a sum of terms.
wherever (Section 5.3, rule (3)). Basics: derivative rules
Differentiate both sides with respect to , treating as a function of , then solve for (Section 5.3.2). Lesson: implicit differentiation
Solution
Isolate one term and square
Move the second term to the right-hand side:
Squaring both sides (and using , ):
Each side now has a single square root, so squaring removes both roots at once. Squaring is allowed (equal numbers have equal squares), but it may let in extra solutions where instead. We deal with that in Step 3.and for (Basic 1).Factorise the squared equation
So , or , that is , i.e.
Grouping and exposes the common factor . A product is zero exactly when one of its factors is zero, so there are only two candidates for .Difference of squares and common factors (Basic 2). Basics: solving for dy/dxTest both candidates in the original equation
Candidate . The left side becomes . For , , so this is 0 only when . So is not a solution except at the single point .
Candidate . First, , so exists. Then
Hence the points satisfying the given equation with are exactly the points of the curve
This is the step that squaring forces on us. The line satisfies the squared equation but not the original one (try : the left side is ). Its only point that does satisfy the original, , already lies on the curve . So the given equation defines as this one function of , and that is the function we differentiate. (A common shortcut, dividing the squared equation by , needs exactly this justification.)Using for . Checking solutions after squaring (Basic 1).Differentiate with the quotient rule
With , , , , and :
This holds for every with , as required.
The two branches of the squared equation (horizontal and vertical scales differ). The blue curve is the actual solution set for ; it falls everywhere, matching . The dashed line satisfies only the squared equation and shares just the origin with the curve. The minus sign in front stays outside the fraction. The numerator simplifies to , which is why the answer is so clean.Quotient rule, rule (3) of Section 5.3 (Basic 3). Basics: derivative rulesConfirm by implicit differentiation
Differentiate the original equation term by term with respect to , using the product rule and the chain rule :
Collect the terms:
Now substitute and , and write (so ). The numerator is , and the denominator is . Dividing,
The differentiation itself never uses the solved form of (only the final simplification does), so it checks the quotient-rule work of Step 4 by a different route. Cancelling is fine because makes . The denominator of the implicit formula is not zero, so the formula is valid at every point of the curve.Implicit differentiation, Section 5.3.2; product rule (rule (2), Section 5.3); chain rule, Theorem 4. Lesson: implicit differentiation
For the equation holds exactly when (the other factor of the squared equation, , fails except at the origin). Hence
as was to be proved.
At : . Original equation: is (to 7 decimals; exactly 0, since both terms equal ). ✓
Formula: . Implicit formula: numerator , denominator , ratio with the minus sign . ✓
- Accepting because it satisfies the squared equation. It does not satisfy the original.
- Dividing by without comment. That is exactly the claim , which needs Step 3.
- Losing the minus sign in when differentiating, or applying the quotient rule as (wrong order).
- If an implicit relation can be solved for , solving first often gives the cleanest derivative.
- After squaring, always test every candidate in the original equation.
- Implicit differentiation is a good independent check: both routes must agree at every point of the curve.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Squaring both sides; checking candidates | Steps 1, 3 | Algebra of equations |
| Difference of squares, common factors | Step 2 | Algebra |
| Quotient rule | Step 4 | Rule (3), Section 5.3 (Basics: derivative rules) |
| Product rule, chain rule | Step 5 | Rule (2), Section 5.3; Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Implicit differentiation | Step 5 | Section 5.3.2 (Lesson: implicit differentiation) |
| Numerical values, figure coordinates | Check, figure | Recomputed in the site's verification script |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →