Example 38: satisfies
If , show that .
Here , .
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. (product rule),
Multiplying both sides by ,
. Hence proved.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Differentiating directly is messy. Instead, first rewrite the first derivative without a fraction,
and differentiate this equation with the product rule. The result rearranges straight into the required relation.
- Given
- . It is defined for , but its derivative exists only for (Example 24), so we work on the open interval .
- To show
- for every in .
- Plan
- Write , clear the square root, differentiate both sides (product rule and chain rule), and multiply through by . Then repeat with the book's alternative (square first), and confirm by computing directly.
Basics you need
For , (Example 24 and the table after it, Section 5.3.3). At the denominator is 0 and there is no derivative. Lesson: derivatives of inverse trig functions
(Section 5.3). Basics: derivative rules
Chain rule with outer function (derivative ) and inner function (derivative ):
valid for . Lesson: chain rule
, also written , with . Lesson: second order derivative
Solution
First derivative, and clear the fraction
For , by Basic 1,
so, multiplying both sides by ,
Multiplying by (which is positive on ) removes the fraction. Differentiating a product is easier than differentiating a quotient containing a square root, and the right side becomes the constant 1, whose derivative is 0.Differentiate both sides with respect to
The left side is a product with and . By the product rule (Basic 2):
If two expressions are equal for every in an interval, their derivatives are equal too. The derivative of is, by definition, (Basic 4). The right side, 1, has derivative 0.Product rule (Section 5.3). Basics: derivative rulesDifferentiate the square root
By Basic 3, . Substituting into Step 2:
This is the chain rule: the derivative of the outer square root, , times the derivative of the inside, . The 2s cancel, as in the book's line with .Chain rule, Theorem 4 (Section 5.3.1). Lesson: chain ruleMultiply through by
Multiply every term by , using :
This is the required result, for every in .
The target has in front of and no fractions. Multiplying by the positive number achieves exactly this, and since it is not zero it does not change which equations are true.for .The book's alternative: square first
Write , . Squaring gives
Differentiate with the product rule, using (chain rule):
Divide by , which is allowed because :
Squaring removes the square root completely, so no chain rule on is needed. The price is a division by at the end, which the book does not comment on; it is valid because is never zero on .Direct check: compute itself
Write and use the chain rule:
Then
so once more.
This brute-force route needs fractional powers but confirms the result independently. It also gives the actual second derivative, which the numerical check below uses.Power rule with , and .
For and : , , and
At the derivatives do not exist, so the relation is about the open interval .
Take , where . Then and . So
and the difference is to seven decimal places.
From values of alone, with : and the second difference is about , matching both derivatives.
- Forgetting the domain. and exist only for ; the relation is not claimed at .
- Differentiating only one factor. needs the product rule; writing just loses the term.
- Missing the inner derivative of . is , not .
- Dividing by something that could be zero. In the alternative method, dividing by is fine only because . Say so.
- Before differentiating a second time, rearrange into a product form without fractions or roots (here , or ).
- Then the product rule produces and together, which is exactly the shape of relations like .
- The same trick (clear the fraction, then use the product rule) handles Exercise 5.7, Question 17, , and Question 22 of the Miscellaneous Exercise on Chapter 5, .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| , | Steps 1, 5, 6 | Example 24 and table, Section 5.3.3 (Lesson: derivatives of inverse trig functions) |
| Product rule | Steps 2, 5 | Algebra of derivatives, Section 5.3 |
| Chain rule; | Steps 3, 5, 6 | Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 (Lesson: chain rule) |
| ; notation , | Steps 2, 5 | Section 5.7 (Lesson: second order derivative) |
| (here ) | Step 6 | Table 5.3, Section 5.3 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →