Exercise 5.7 · Q9: Second derivative of ,
Find the second order derivatives of the functions given in Exercises 1 to 10.
9.
Let (). By the chain rule,
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
is a composite function: an outer applied to an inner . The chain rule gives the first derivative . For the second derivative, treat this as : chain rule again, with the product rule for the inner .
The outer logarithm needs a positive input, , so everything lives on .
- Given
- (natural logarithms).
- To find
- , with the set of where it is valid.
- Plan
- (1) Find the domain: both logarithms need positive inputs. (2) Chain rule for . (3) Product rule for . (4) Chain rule on for . (5) Compare with the textbook form.
Basics you need
is defined only for ; exactly when (because and is increasing). (Theorem 5(2), Section 5.4). Basics: exponentials and logarithms
means: first compute , then take . It exists only where both stages exist. Basics: composite functions
For : . Lesson: chain rule
(Section 5.3, rule (2)); (Table 5.3). Basics: derivative rules
Solution
Find the domain:
Let . Two conditions are needed:
- the inner exists: ;
- the outer logarithm gets a positive input: , that is, .
Together: . For example, at , and does not exist; at , and does not exist. All the work below is on .
The formula for a derivative can look fine at points where the function itself does not exist; stating the domain first prevents that. Here it also guarantees and , so and none of the denominators below can be zero.First derivative: chain rule
Outer function , with derivative ; inner function , with derivative . So
The derivative of the outer function is evaluated at the inner one (giving ) and then multiplied by the derivative of the inner function. This is the same pattern as the book's Example 26(ii), .Chain rule (Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1); (Theorem 5). Lesson: chain ruleDerivative of the inner : product rule
We will need . With () and ():
The first derivative is over the product , so differentiating it will need the derivative of that product. because .Product rule (Section 5.3, rule (2)).Second derivative: chain rule on
Write . Outer function , with derivative (power rule, ); inner function , with derivative (Step 3). So
So for .
The second derivative is the derivative of the first derivative from Step 2. Writing "one over something" as "something to the power " lets the power rule and the chain rule do the work. (The quotient rule gives the same: .) The denominator is positive for (Step 1).Chain rule (Theorem 4); power rule (Table 5.3). Lesson: second order derivativeCompare with the textbook and read the sign
The textbook's answer is , exactly our expression. An equivalent expanded form is , since .
For , , so and the second derivative is negative: the slope decreases as grows, and the graph of bends downward everywhere on its domain.
The book's answer does not state the domain; it is understood to be the domain of the function, which we found in Step 1.
For , defined for :
(Textbook answer: .)
At , , so , and the formulas give
With : the central difference is about , and the second difference is about . ✓
- Stopping at for the first derivative: the inner derivative must be multiplied in.
- Differentiating as : it is a product, and its derivative is .
- Giving the domain as . For , and does not exist.
- For a composite of logarithms, each logarithm needs a positive input: here and , so .
- To differentiate , use the chain rule on : the result is .
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| defined for ; ; increasing | Steps 1, 5 | Section 5.4 (Basics: exponentials and logarithms) |
| Steps 2, 3 | Theorem 5(2), Section 5.4 (Lesson: exponential and logarithmic functions) | |
| Chain rule | Steps 2, 4 | Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1; compare Example 26(ii) (Lesson: chain rule) |
| Step 3 | Section 5.3, rule (2) | |
| , here | Step 4 | Table 5.3 (Basics: derivative rules) |
| Step 4 | Section 5.7 (Lesson: second order derivative) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →