Exercise 5.5 · Q16: for
Find the derivative of the function given by
and hence find .
Let . Taking log on both sides,
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. ,
for . Putting ,
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
A product of four factors is tedious with the product rule. Taking logs turns the product into a sum of four logs, each differentiated in one line. The logs need every factor positive, so we find where that is true, and then see that the final formula holds even beyond that.
- Given
- , a polynomial, defined for all real .
- To find
- , and .
- Plan
- (1) Find where . (2) Take logs. (3) Differentiate. (4) Multiply by . (5) Extend to and look at . (6) Put . (7) Cross-check with a closed form for .
Basics you need
for (Section 5.4); it extends to any number of positive factors. Basics: exponentials and logarithms
for , and . Basics: solving for dy/dx
Solution
Where is positive?
, , are all for every , because even powers are never negative. The factor is positive exactly when . So
Logarithmic differentiation needs the logged quantities positive. Here that means at first; Step 5 removes this restriction.Positivity requirement (Section 5.5). Lesson: logarithmic differentiationTake logarithms
For , every factor is positive, so
The log of a product of positive numbers is the sum of their logs. Sums are differentiated term by term.(Section 5.4). Basics: exponentials and logarithmsDifferentiate both sides
Each term is with a simple polynomial, so it differentiates to :
The inner derivatives are , , , by the power rule. On the left, .Multiply by
Multiplying by leaves . If we multiply out, each fraction cancels its own factor and leaves the product of the other three: that is exactly what the product rule for four factors would give.Logarithmic differentiation, . Lesson: logarithmic differentiationWhat about and ?
For , , so use
Taking logs of gives the same sum, except that the first term is , whose derivative is . Also . So the formula of Step 4 holds for every .
At the bracket is undefined, but is a polynomial and the product rule gives directly: only the term where is differentiated survives, so
The book's answer does not mention the restriction. After multiplying out (Step 4), the expression is a polynomial and is valid everywhere, including ; written with the bracket, it needs .Product rule (Section 5.3). Basics: derivative rulesPut
, and the bracket is
So
At every power of is , so each denominator is and the numerators are , adding to .Substitution into the formula of Step 4. Basics: derivative rulesCross-check with a closed form
Multiply by and use four times:
So for ,
At both sides equal (, and the sum has terms, each ), so for every . Then
The same value by a completely different route. It also confirms Step 5: , which is seven pairs , each , plus : .Difference of squares; geometric sum; sum of the first natural numbers (Class XI). Basics: solving for dy/dx
for (and ); . (Textbook answer: the same expression and .)
The central difference gives to five decimal places. At : , the bracket is , so ; and the sum up to is as well.
- Dropping inner derivatives: , not .
- Forgetting to multiply by at the end, so that comes out as instead of .
- Using : it is a product, .
- Ignoring where the logs exist. The log step needs (extendable to ).
- For a long product, is the sum of over the factors .
- The same formula works where by logging (or ); it fails only where a factor is zero.
- A neat closed form (here ) is a valuable independent check.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Positivity requirement for logarithmic differentiation | Steps 1, 5 | Section 5.5 (Lesson: logarithmic differentiation) |
| Steps 2, 5 | Section 5.4 | |
| ; chain rule | Steps 3, 5 | Theorem 5, Section 5.4; Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| Power rule; product rule | Steps 3, 5, 7 | Table 5.3; algebra of derivatives, Section 5.3 |
| Geometric sum; | Step 7 | Sequences and series (Class XI) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →