Exercise 5.5 · Q14: if
Find of the function given by
Taking log on both sides (, ),
Differentiating both sides w.r.t. ,
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Each side is a single power with a variable base and a variable exponent. Taking logs of both sides brings the exponents down: . Then implicit differentiation, with the chain rule for and , gives a linear equation for . The logs need and .
- Given
- , with , , and a differentiable function of .
- To find
- , and where the formula holds.
- Plan
- (1) Take logs. (2) Differentiate both sides. (3) Collect the terms. (4) Solve, with the condition. (5) Test the formula on the simplest pieces of the relation.
Basics you need
for (Section 5.4). Bases of variable powers must be positive (Section 5.5). Basics: exponentials and logarithms
Differentiate both sides, then solve the linear equation for (Section 5.3.2). Basics: solving for dy/dx
Solution
Take logarithms of both sides
Where and , both sides are positive and
and . The book does not state the condition, but without and the powers with variable exponents (and their logs) are not defined.(Section 5.4); positivity requirement (Section 5.5). Basics: exponentials and logarithmsDifferentiate both sides with respect to
Left side, product rule on :
Right side, product rule on :
So
is a composite: outer , inner , so its derivative is . For there are three layers: , , and itself, so the chain rule gives .Collect the terms
Move to the left (it becomes ) and to the right (it becomes ).Rearranging a linear equation. Basics: solving for dy/dxSolve for , with the condition
where , and .
Dividing needs a non-zero divisor. Writing the terms in this order gives exactly the book's form.Division by a non-zero quantity. Basics: solving for dy/dxTest the formula on the simplest pieces of the relation
- The line (with ): holds. The formula gives wherever this is not , the slope of the line.
- The axis : holds. The formula gives wherever , the slope of the axis.
- The axis : holds. The denominator is , so the formula gives nothing, and rightly so: this line is vertical and has no finite slope.
These quick cases show that the formula behaves sensibly, including failing exactly where a vertical piece of the relation appears. The relation also has other pieces, away from these lines; the check below tests the formula at a point of one of them.
valid where , and the denominator is not zero. (Textbook answer: the same expression.)
Take and look for between and (where ) with . Solving numerically gives , with . At this point:
- numerator ,
- denominator ,
- so the formula gives .
Solving the relation for again at and dividing the change in by gives , the same.
- Dropping the inner derivative: , not .
- Forgetting in .
- Sign errors: both terms come with a minus sign before rearranging.
- Ignoring the conditions , .
- Single power on each side: take logs of both sides, then differentiate implicitly.
- .
- Testing a formula on the obvious solutions (here , , ) is a quick way to catch errors.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Section 5.4 | |
| Positivity requirement for logarithmic differentiation | Step 1 | Section 5.5 (Lesson: logarithmic differentiation) |
| Product rule; chain rule | Step 2 | Section 5.3; Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| ; | Step 2 | Table 5.3; Theorem 5, Section 5.4 |
| Implicit differentiation | Steps 2–4 | Section 5.3.2 (Lesson: implicit differentiation) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →