Exercise 5.4 · Q7: Differentiate ,
Differentiate the following w.r.t. :
Let . By the chain rule,
.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Three functions are applied in turn: square root, exponential, square root again. The chain rule for three links multiplies their three rates. An index law also lets us rewrite the function as the simpler , which gives a second, independent route to the same answer and shows that the textbook's form and the simplified form agree.
- Given
- , .
- To find
- .
- Plan
- (1) Domain, and why the question says . (2) Name the links , , and differentiate each. (3) Multiply. (4) Simplify, and check by differentiating directly.
Basics you need
, so for (power rule, Table 5.3). At this has a zero denominator. Basics: derivative rules
for every real , and always. Basics: exponentials and logarithms
, and for . Basics: exponentials and logarithms
(Section 5.3.1). Basics: composite functions
Solution
Where is the function defined, and why ?
needs . Then is always positive, so the outer square root is always defined. So is defined for , with . The question restricts to because has no derivative at (proved in Step 5); the source of the trouble is the innermost link , which has no derivative at .
Each square root needs a non-negative input. The outer one is safe automatically, since an exponential is never negative. The restriction is there for the derivative, not for the function: Step 3 will have in a denominator.Range of the exponential function is the positive reals (Section 5.4). Basics: exponentials and logarithmsName the three links and differentiate each
, , .
The links are in calculation order: take , raise to it, take the square root of the result. The two square-root links both use the power rule with ; the middle link is Theorem 5. Since , the outer link is always differentiable; only the inner link needs .Power rule (Table 5.3) and Theorem 5 (1), Section 5.4. Basics: derivative rulesMultiply (chain rule) and substitute back
Each rate is evaluated at the value entering its link: the outer root sees , the exponential sees . In the last line the two square roots are combined using , allowed because and . This last line is exactly the textbook's form.Chain rule for three functions, Section 5.3.1. Lesson: the chain ruleSimplify, and check by a second route
Since , the middle line of Step 3 simplifies:
Second route: is a two-link chain with inner , . So
The two routes agree.
divided by is (index law for division). Rewriting the function first is usually the quicker way; doing it both ways shows the two forms are the same function and catches slips.Why not at ?
The function is defined at , but it has no derivative there. Only the right-hand side is available, since the domain starts at . The right-hand difference quotient is for . Using with , it is at least , which grows without bound as . So there is no finite limit, and no derivative at .
This is why the question says . The graph of leaves the point with a vertical tangent, just as does. The inequality for (the graph of lies on or above its tangent line at ) is not proved in Chapter 5; it follows from Theorem 1 of Section 6.3 in Chapter 6, applied to , whose derivative is positive for , so .Differentiable at a point means the difference quotient has a finite limit (Section 5.3). Lesson: differentiability
For ,
(Textbook answer: , . The same as our first form; Step 4 turns it into the second.)
Take : . The textbook form gives ; the simplified form gives . Both are about . A difference quotient of with on each side of gives . They agree.
- Missing a link. Two of the three links are square roots, and each contributes a factor ; these two halves give the in the denominator. The exponential link contributes the factor .
- Evaluating the outer rate at . The outer root's rate is with , not .
- Claiming a derivative at . The formula has in the denominator, and the function really has a vertical tangent there.
- Before differentiating, look for an index law that shortens the chain: .
- Answers that look different may be equal; show it by simplifying one into the other.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| for all | Steps 1, 2 | Feature (2) of exponential functions, Section 5.4 |
| , | Step 2 | Power rule, Table 5.3 |
| Steps 2, 4 | Theorem 5 (1), Section 5.4 (Lesson: exponential and logarithmic functions) | |
| Chain rule for three functions | Step 3 | Extension after Theorem 4, Section 5.3.1 |
| , , | Steps 3, 4 | Laws of indices (Class IX and XI) |
| Differentiable means a finite limit of the difference quotient | Step 5 | Definition of differentiability, Section 5.3 |
| for | Step 5 | Not proved in Chapter 5. It follows from Theorem 1 of Section 6.3 (Chapter 6) applied to |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →