Exercise 5.1 · Q24: Is (with ) continuous?
24. Determine if defined by
is a continuous function?
For , is a polynomial and is the composite of the continuous functions and . So their product is continuous at every .
At : . For , , so
As , . So by the sandwich theorem,
, so is continuous at .
is continuous at every . Yes, is a continuous function.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Near , swings between and infinitely often and has no limit. But it never leaves that band, so multiplying by traps the product between and . Both walls shrink to , so the product is squeezed to , which is exactly the value . Away from , is built from continuous functions, so it is continuous there too.
- Given
- for , and .
- To find
- Whether is continuous at every point of its domain.
- Plan
- (1) Domain. (2) Continuity at every by Theorems 1 and 2. (3) . (4) The bound . (5) Both one-sided limits at by the sandwich theorem. (6) Compare. (7) Why the factor is essential.
Basics you need
Left-hand limit, right-hand limit and exist and are equal (Definition 1, Section 5.2). Basics: left-hand and right-hand limits
is the composite with inner function and outer function . Theorem 2: if is continuous at and at , then is continuous at . Basics: composite functions
for every real , so . Basics: trigonometric identities
If near (except possibly at ) and and have the same limit at , then . It works for one-sided limits too (Class XI, Chapter 12). Basics: what a limit is
Solution
The domain
For , is defined, so is defined; and is given. So is defined on all of . We check continuity at every , then at .
Every is a point of continuity
Fix . Build step by step:
Inner function : a rational function with non-zero denominator at , so continuous at (Example 16, or Example 9).
Outer function : continuous at every real , in particular at (Example 17). By Theorem 2, is continuous at .
Product: is a polynomial, continuous at (Example 14). By Theorem 1 (3), is continuous at .
Finally, every with has the same sign as , so and on that open interval around . Hence
The special value at does not interfere: the interval stays on one side of , so near the function is given by the single formula. The chain "inner, outer, then product" mirrors exactly how the formula is built.Theorem 2 (composites) and Theorem 1 (3) (products). Lesson: algebra of continuous functionsThe value at
The formula cannot be used at ( is undefined), which is why the question supplies the value separately.The key bound
For every , (Basic 3). Multiplying by :
that is,
We cannot control itself near , but we can control its size: it is never bigger than . Multiplying an inequality by a non-negative number keeps its direction, so the bound passes to the product.and .Both one-sided limits at
Right-hand limit. For , , and . By the sandwich theorem,
Left-hand limit. For the same bound holds (it was proved for every ), and as . So
The function is trapped between two walls that pinch together at the origin, from both sides. Whatever the wiggles do, they cannot escape the shrinking gap between and .Sandwich theorem, Class XI, Chapter 12. Basics: what a limit isCompare
All three agree, so is continuous at . With Step 2, is continuous at every real number: yes, is a continuous function.
Continuity at a point. Lesson: continuity at a pointWhy the factor is essential
Without it, has no limit at . Take and , Both sequences tend to from the right, yet
Arbitrarily close to the values and both occur, so they cannot settle on one number. With the factor , those values become and , both tending to .
This explains the question's interest: a wildly oscillating factor can still give a continuous function, provided it is multiplied by something that tends to and the oscillation stays bounded.
Yes. is continuous at every (Theorems 1 and 2) and at (both one-sided limits are by the squeeze ). So is continuous for all .
(Textbook answer: Yes, is continuous for all .)
| wall | ||
|---|---|---|
Each is at most the wall , and both shrink towards . ✓ The signs jump around (that is the factor), but the sizes do not.
- Writing . The product rule for limits needs both limits to exist, and does not. Use the squeeze instead.
- Saying . "" is not a number; this is exactly the oscillation that has no limit.
- Forgetting the points . "Is a continuous function" asks about every point of the domain.
- Bounding wrongly. times gives ; multiplying by instead would need care with the sign of .
- (something tending to ) (something bounded) tends to . Prove it with the sandwich theorem.
- Away from the special point, use Theorems 1 and 2, naming the inner and outer functions of each composite.
- A function can oscillate infinitely often near a point and still be continuous there.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Continuity at a point; continuous function | Steps 2, 6 | Definitions 1 and 2, Section 5.2 (Lesson: continuity at a point) |
| continuous for ; polynomials continuous | Step 2 | Examples 9, 14 and 16, Section 5.2 |
| Sine is continuous | Step 2 | Example 17, Section 5.2.1 |
| Composite and product of continuous functions | Step 2 | Theorem 2 and Theorem 1 (3), Section 5.2.1 (Lesson: algebra of continuous functions) |
| ; , | Steps 4, 7 | Class XI, Chapter 3 (Trigonometric Functions) |
| Sandwich theorem | Step 5 | Class XI, Chapter 12 (Limits and Derivatives) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →