Example 13: Verify ; find
If
then verify that . Also find .
Expanding along :
Cofactors:
Its entries (row of times column of ):
Hence .
Since , exists and
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
When you multiply by its adjoint, each diagonal entry is "a row of times its own cofactors", which is , and each off-diagonal entry is "a row of times the cofactors of a different row", which is 0. So . Dividing by (allowed when ) turns this into , which says .
- Given
- The matrix above.
- To show
- , where is the identity matrix.
- To find
- .
- Plan
- Compute ; compute all nine cofactors; build ; multiply entry by entry and compare with ; since , write and check it.
Basics you need
is the determinant left after deleting row and column ; , with signs / / . Basics: the + − + sign pattern
is the transpose of the matrix of cofactors: the cofactors of row 1 of become column 1 of , and so on. Basics: transpose and identity
Entry of is row of times column of . Two matrices give a product. Basics: matrix facts the chapter uses
If , then (Theorem 4, Section 4.5). If , has no inverse. Basics: why the inverse divides by |A|
Solution
Compute by expanding along row 1
No row or column of contains a zero, so no expansion is shorter than another; we use row 1, as the textbook does. The signs along row 1 are :
The three determinants are
So
We need twice: for the right-hand side of the identity, and to decide whether exists. Here , so is non-singular and invertible.Expansion along a row, Section 4.2.3; non-singular means (Definition 5, Section 4.5). Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinantCofactors of row 1
The three minors of row 1 are the determinants already found in Step 1:
Expanding along row 1 is the same as , which is . The minus sign written in Step 1 in front of the middle term is the sign that turns into ., Definition 2, Section 4.4. Lesson: minors and cofactorsCofactors of row 2
Delete row 2 and, in turn, columns 1, 2, 3. The signs along row 2 are :
is 0 because, after deleting row 2 and column 3, the two remaining rows are both : rows 1 and 3 of agree in their first two entries. A determinant with equal rows is .Middle row of the sign pattern: . Basics: the + − + sign patternCofactors of row 3
Delete row 3 and, in turn, columns 1, 2, 3. The signs along row 3 are :
Together with Steps 2 and 3 this gives all nine cofactors, matching the textbook: , , , , , , , , . In the leftover entries are over (rows 1 and 2, columns 2 and 3), so it is .Matrix of cofactors and
Place each cofactor where its element sits:
Transpose (row becomes column ):
The adjoint is the transpose of the cofactor matrix (Definition 3). So the cofactors of row 1, , form column 1 of . This arrangement is what makes the product in Step 6 pair each row of with the cofactors of a row.Definition 3, Section 4.5.1. Lesson: the adjointMultiply , entry by entry
Both matrices are , so the product is defined and is . Entry is row of times column of :
Assembling,
So is verified.
Look at what each entry is. : row 2 with its own cofactors, which is . : row 2 with the cofactors of row 1, which is 0 (the Note after Example 10). Every diagonal entry is of the first kind and every off-diagonal entry of the second, which is why the result is times . Theorem 1 states this for every square matrix.Theorem 1, Section 4.5. Basics: matrix facts the chapter usesFind
Since , is invertible (Theorem 4) and
Dividing by the number gives , and the same works for . A matrix that multiplies to on both sides is . Here , so the inverse is the adjoint itself. This step is impossible when : there is nothing to divide by, and Theorem 4 says no inverse exists.Check:
Because here, is exactly the product of Step 6, which is . For the other order, row of times column of :
So as well.
An inverse must work on both sides: (Chapter 3, Section 3.7). Checking both orders confirms the answer completely. For square matrices one order actually implies the other (Example 19, Step 3 proves this with determinants), but the check costs little and catches arithmetic slips.Definition of the inverse, Chapter 3, Section 3.7. Basics: transpose and identity
and
and . Hence
(This agrees with the textbook's own solution.)
Use to undo on a column. Take with entries . Then has entries , , . Applying to :
We get back , as an inverse must.
- Using instead of its transpose. The matrix of cofactors with along the top row is not ; the product with would then fail to be .
- Dropping the sign of a cofactor. but ; but .
- Reading a minor from the wrong rows. uses rows 1 and 2, columns 2 and 3: over .
- Writing in general. That is true here only because ; in general divide by .
- : diagonal entries are rows with their own cofactors (), off-diagonal entries are rows with other rows' cofactors (0).
- If , .
- Always finish by multiplying by your ; the identity must appear.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Expansion of a determinant along a row | Step 1 | Section 4.2.3 (Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant) |
| Minors and cofactors, | Steps 2 to 4 | Definitions 1 and 2, Section 4.4 (Lesson: minors and cofactors) |
| = transpose of | Step 5 | Definition 3, Section 4.5.1 (Lesson: the adjoint) |
| Row times other row's cofactors = 0 | Step 6 | Note after Example 10, Section 4.4 |
| Steps 6, 7 | Theorem 1, Section 4.5 | |
| Non-singular: | Steps 1, 7 | Definition 5, Section 4.5 |
| invertible iff non-singular; | Step 7 | Theorem 4, Section 4.5 (Lesson: inverse of a matrix) |
| Inverse: | Step 8 | Chapter 3, Section 3.7 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →