Example 11: Minors and cofactors; check
Find minors and cofactors of the elements of the determinant
and verify that .
Using :
Now
Hence .
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Each element has a minor : the determinant left over when you delete the row and the column of . Its cofactor is the minor with a sign attached, . Multiplying a row by its own cofactors and adding gives the determinant. Multiplying a row by the cofactors of a different row always gives 0, because that sum is secretly the expansion of a determinant with two equal rows.
- Given
- A determinant with rows , and .
- To find
- All nine minors and cofactors , then check that .
- Plan
- Name every element; write the sign pattern; work through the rows one at a time (delete, evaluate the , attach the sign); collect the results; compute the requested sum; then explain why it had to be 0 and contrast it with the sum that gives .
Basics you need
is the element in row and column : the first subscript is the row, the second is the column. Basics: rows, columns and positions
The product down the main diagonal minus the product down the other diagonal:
is when is even and when is odd. On a grid this gives a chessboard of signs starting with in the top left corner. Basics: the + − + sign pattern
equals the sum of the elements of any one row (or column), each multiplied by its own cofactor. For row 1: . (Section 4.2.3 and the Remark after Example 10.)
Solution
Name every element
Reading row by row, the elements of are
The question asks for "the minors and cofactors of the elements", which means all nine of them, and the final check uses by name. Writing the labels down once prevents the commonest slip in this topic: reading as "row 3, column 2".First subscript = row, second subscript = column. Basics: rows, columns and positionsThe recipe and the sign pattern
For each element : delete row and column ; the determinant that remains is the minor (Definition 1). Then the cofactor is (Definition 2). The factor follows the chessboard pattern
So at the positions, and at the positions , , , .
A minor ignores where the element sits; the cofactor adds that information through the sign. The sign is exactly what makes "row times its own cofactors" equal to the determinant, as in the expansion formula of Section 4.2.3, which alternates along row 1.Row 1: and their cofactors
. Delete row 1 and column 1; the entries remain:
. Delete row 1 and column 2:
. Delete row 1 and column 3:
The leftover entries keep their relative positions: what was upper left stays upper left. That matters, because swapping the two rows of a determinant changes its sign. In , the sign turns into .Row 2: and their cofactors
. Delete row 2 and column 1:
. Delete row 2 and column 2:
. Delete row 2 and column 3:
The element is 0, but its minor and cofactor are not: a minor is built from the other entries, never from the element itself. The middle row has the pattern , so and change sign and does not.Subtracting a negative: . Basics: algebra the chapter leans onRow 3: and their cofactors
. Delete row 3 and column 1:
. Delete row 3 and column 2 (see the figure below):
. Delete row 3 and column 3:
Finding : strike out row 3 and column 2 (dashed); the four blue entries keep their places and form the minor. Position has sign , so . Row 3 is the row the final check needs, so these three cofactors are the important ones: , , . Notice that none of them uses an entry of row 3. Every one of them is built from rows 1 and 2 only. Step 8 depends on exactly this.Definition 1 (minor) and Definition 2 (cofactor), Section 4.4. Lesson: minors and cofactorsCollect all nine results
Element Minor Sign Cofactor A table lets you check the signs at a glance: in every row of the table with sign , the cofactor is the negative of the minor, and in every row with sign the two are equal.Compute
Take the elements of row 1, , , , and the cofactors of row 3, , , :
So , as required.
This is the "verify" part of the question: a direct substitution of the values from Steps 1 and 5. The elements come from one row and the cofactors from another; that mismatch is the whole point of the check.Why the answer had to be 0
The cofactors are built only from rows 1 and 2 (Step 5). So they are also the row-3 cofactors of the determinant obtained by replacing row 3 by a copy of row 1:
Expanding along its row 3 multiplies the new row 3, which is , by those same cofactors. That is exactly the sum of Step 7:
And , because it has two equal rows. Expanding it instead along row 2 shows this: each minor of a row-2 element is built from rows 1 and 3 of , which are equal, so each minor has two equal rows and looks like
So all three terms vanish and . For the numbers here, expanding along row 1 gives the same:
This is the textbook's Note after Example 10: elements of one row multiplied by the cofactors of a different row always add up to 0. The check in this question is one instance of it. The Note itself only says " since and are identical"; this reprint has no section that proves "two equal rows give 0", so the row-2 argument above supplies that proof for any determinant (it goes beyond the textbook's text). (The second term carries because in the expansion along row 1.)Note after Example 10, Section 4.4; expansion along a row, Section 4.2.3. Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinantContrast: a row with its own cofactors gives
Row 1 with the cofactors of row 1:
Row 3 with the cofactors of row 3:
Both give , as they must: a determinant can be expanded along any row.
Matching a row with its own cofactors rebuilds ; matching it with another row's cofactors gives 0. Seeing both side by side is the best protection against mixing them up later, when this pair of facts becomes in Section 4.5.Remark after Example 10: = sum of the products of the elements of any row (or column) with their corresponding cofactors. Lesson: the adjoint
Minors: , , , , , , , , .
Cofactors: , , , , , , , , .
And equals . (These agree with the textbook's own solution.)
Other "wrong pairings" should also give 0. Row 2 with the cofactors of row 1:
Column 1 with the cofactors of column 2:
And column 2 with its own cofactors gives again:
Every value agrees with Steps 7 to 9, so the nine cofactors are consistent with one another.
- Forgetting the sign. Writing (the minor) instead of . Positions all flip the sign.
- Including the element in its own minor. is built from (rows 1 and 3, columns 1 and 3); itself is deleted.
- Changing the order of the leftover entries. In the entries stay as over ; writing over gives , the wrong sign.
- Sign slips with negatives. and , not .
- Expecting from the check. Row 1 with the cofactors of row 3 is not an expansion of ; it is 0 by design.
- Minor: delete the element's row and column, evaluate what is left. Cofactor: multiply by , the chessboard sign.
- A row times its own cofactors gives (here ); a row times another row's cofactors gives 0.
- The 0 happens because the cofactors of a row never involve that row, so the sum is the expansion of a determinant with two equal rows.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| : row , column | Step 1 | Chapter 3, Section 3.2 (Basics: rows, columns and positions) |
| A determinant equals | Steps 3 to 5, 8 | Section 4.2.2 |
| Minor : delete row and column | Steps 2 to 5 | Definition 1, Section 4.4 (Lesson: minors and cofactors) |
| Cofactor | Steps 2 to 6 | Definition 2, Section 4.4 |
| Expansion of a determinant along any row | Steps 8, 9 | Section 4.2.3; Remark after Example 10 (Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant) |
| Row times another row's cofactors = 0 | Steps 7, 8 | Note after Example 10, Section 4.4 |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →