Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The one idea this problem is built on
The coefficients of the system are exactly the entries of the given matrix A, row for row. So the system is AX=B with this same A, and once A−1 is known the solution is simply X=A−1B: one matrix times a column. Here ∣A∣=−1, so A−1=−adjA, and every entry of the adjoint just changes sign.
Given, to find, and the plan
Given
The 3×3 matrix A and the system above.
To find
(a) A−1; (b) x,y,z, using A−1.
Plan
(1) ∣A∣, expanding along row 1. (2) All nine minors and cofactors. (3) adjA and A−1. (4) Check AA−1=I. (5) Write the system as AX=B and confirm the coefficient matrix is the given A. (6) X=A−1B. (7) Check in the three equations.
(The minors 0,−2,1 are worked out in Step 2.) ∣A∣=−1=0, so A is nonsingular and A−1 exists.
In the middle term three signs meet: the position sign −, the entry −3, and the minor −2. Their product is −(−3)(−2)=−6. A negative determinant is perfectly fine; only ∣A∣=0 would mean no inverse.
M11=0 because the rows (2,−4) and (1,−2) are proportional (the first is twice the second). A zero cofactor is allowed; it just puts a 0 into the adjoint. Each sign (−1)i+j is written explicitly so none is forgotten.
Since ∣A∣=−1, dividing by ∣A∣ changes every sign:
A−1=−11adjA=0−2−1195−2−23−13.
This answers the first part of the question.
The adjoint is the transpose of the cofactor matrix, so the cofactors of row 1 of A (0,2,1) fill column 1. Then ∣A∣1=−11=−1 multiplies every entry, so the inverse has whole-number entries. This happens whenever ∣A∣=±1.
Because A−1 has whole-number entries, we can check AA−1=I directly. Each 1 on the diagonal is ∣A∣1 times "a row times its own cofactors" =−11(−1); each 0 is "a row times another row's cofactors".
A is 3×3 and X is 3×1, so AX is 3×1, the order of B.
The phrase "using A−1" only makes sense if the coefficient matrix of the system is the given A, so we confirm it entry by entry. Had the coefficients been arranged differently (for example as the columns of A), we would need the inverse of A′ instead.
Forgetting the sign of ∣A∣. With ∣A∣=−1,A−1=−adjA. Using adjA itself as the inverse gives x=−1,y=−2,z=−3, which fail every equation.
Getting ∣A∣=11. The middle term is −(−3)(−2)=−6, not +6; with +6 the determinant would be 11.
Skipping the transpose. The cofactor matrix is not symmetric here, so using it untransposed gives a wrong inverse (its first row would be 0,−2,−1 after the sign change, instead of 0,1,−2).
What to take away
When the question gives A and then a system, check that the system's coefficient matrix is that A; then one inverse serves both parts.
If ∣A∣=±1, the inverse has whole-number entries and AA−1=I can be checked directly.
X=A−1B: inverse on the left, column of constants on the right.
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →