Exercise 4.5 · Q5: Is , , consistent?
Examine the consistency of the system of equations.
The system is , where
Expanding along :
. So is singular, and we find .
Cofactors:
Since and , the system is inconsistent.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The determinant of the coefficient matrix is 0, so the inverse does not exist and we use the second test of Section 4.6.1: compute . It is not the zero column, and that rules out every solution, because a solution would force . Behind it is a hidden relation: the first equation minus twice the second gives , while the third says .
- Given
- Three linear equations in . The second has no term and the third has no term; those coefficients are 0.
- To find
- Whether the system is consistent or inconsistent.
- Plan
- (1) Write , with zeros for the missing terms. (2) Expand along a row containing a zero; it is 0. (3) Find all nine cofactors and . (4) Compute and conclude, with the reason. (5) Confirm by combining the equations.
Basics you need
is , and is . Every row of needs all three coefficients. Basics: algebra the chapter leans on
Along any row, (each entry) (its cofactor), added up. The signs follow
A row with a zero saves one minor. Basics: the + − + sign pattern
Section 4.6.1, Case II: if , the system has no solution. If , it may or may not have solutions. Basics: why the inverse divides by |A|
Solution
Write the system as
is and is , so is . Row by row:
These are the three left sides, so is the given system.
The zeros matter: they keep each coefficient in the column of its own unknown. Leaving them out would shift entries into the wrong columns.Expand along row 2
Row 2 is : its first entry is 0, so its first term vanishes whatever its minor is. The row 2 signs are :
The two minors that matter:
So : is singular and has no inverse.
The third term is : the pattern sign , the entry , and the minor . Two minus signs make , times gives . With , Case I is closed and we need Case II of Section 4.6.1.Expansion along a row, Section 4.2.3. Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinantAll nine cofactors
Check: row 1 times its cofactors should also give :
Each minor deletes the row and column of its entry; for instance deletes row 2 and column 3, leaving columns 1 and 2 of rows 1 and 3. Expanding along a different row and getting 0 again is a good check that the cofactors, and , are right.Definitions 1 and 2, Section 4.4. Lesson: minors and cofactorsTranspose the matrix of cofactors: the cofactors of row 1 () form column 1, and so on.
The adjoint exists for every square matrix, singular or not; only needs .Definition 3, Section 4.5.1. Lesson: the adjointCompute and conclude
A times a gives a column:
Since and , the system is inconsistent.
Why the rule holds: if for some , then , which equals , using Theorem 1, . Our is not , so no such exists.Section 4.6.1, Case II; Theorem 1, Section 4.5.1. Lesson: solving systems AX = BSee it directly: the equations contradict each other
Take the first equation and subtract twice the second:
The terms cancel (). Any solution of the first two equations therefore has , but the third equation demands . Both cannot hold, so there is no solution.
This is the relation hiding behind : row 3 of , , equals row 1 minus twice row 2. The left side of equation 3 is that same combination of the first two left sides, but the right side 3 is not the matching combination of 2 and , which is 4.Adding multiples of equations keeps every solution.
and has entries , so . The system is inconsistent. (Textbook answer: Inconsistent.)
Satisfy the first two equations and test the third. Take . The second equation gives . The first then gives , which is , so . Now the third: , not 3. ✗ Trying : , , and again. Every solution of the first two equations gives 4, as Step 6 predicts.
- Dropping the zero coefficients. Writing row 2 of as or row 3 as gives a matrix that is not square.
- Getting the sign of a row 2 term wrong. Row 2 starts with : the signs are , not .
- Concluding "inconsistent" from alone. It is that proves it.
- Forgetting to transpose the cofactors before multiplying by . The matrix of cofactors times gives the column instead: non-zero here too, but the working is wrong and in another question it could change the verdict.
- Write every missing term as a zero coefficient, and use zeros to choose the expansion row.
- means one equation's left side is a combination of the others. Whether the right sides match decides between "none" and "infinitely many".
- is a quick, mechanical proof that the right sides do not match.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Consistent and inconsistent systems | Steps 5, 6 | Section 4.6 (Lesson: solving systems AX = B) |
| Expansion of a determinant along any row | Steps 2, 3 | Section 4.2.3 |
| ; = row times its cofactors | Step 3 | Definitions 1, 2, Section 4.4 |
| = transpose of the matrix of cofactors | Step 4 | Definition 3, Section 4.5.1 |
| Step 5 | Theorem 1, Section 4.5.1 | |
| , no solution | Step 5 | Section 4.6.1, Case II |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →