Exercise 4.5 · Q3: Is , consistent?
Examine the consistency of the system of equations.
The system is , where
. So is singular, and we find .
Since and , the system is inconsistent.
Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
Here , so has no inverse and the quick test of Q1 and Q2 is not available. The book's rule for this case: compute . If any solution existed, then , which equals . We find , so no solution can exist: the system is inconsistent. In plain terms, the second left side is exactly twice the first, but 8 is not twice 5. The two lines are parallel.
- Given
- Two linear equations in and .
- To find
- Whether the system is consistent or inconsistent.
- Plan
- (1) Write . (2) Compute ; it is 0. (3) Understand why decides the matter when . (4) Find . (5) Compute and conclude. (6) Confirm directly from the equations and a picture.
Basics you need
Section 4.6: consistent means at least one solution exists, inconsistent means none does. For two lines: crossing (one solution), parallel and distinct (none), the same line (infinitely many). Basics: two lines, cross, parallel or the same
For order 2 (Section 4.2.2):
It is 0 exactly when one row is a multiple of the other, which for two equations means the lines have the same slope. Basics: where the determinant comes from
For every square matrix, , whether or not is zero. This is what makes the test in Step 3 work. Basics: why the inverse divides by |A|
is the matrix with every entry 0. A matrix is as soon as one entry is non-zero.
Solution
Write the system as
is , is , so is :
So is exactly the given pair of equations.
Row 1 of is the coefficients of the first equation, row 2 those of the second. Already the rows look related: row 2, , is twice row 1, .Compute
So is singular and does not exist (Theorem 4, Section 4.5).
With we cannot divide by , so the route is closed. That does not yet tell us whether solutions exist: a singular system can have none or infinitely many. This is Case II of Section 4.6.1, and it needs one more calculation.Why decides it
Suppose some column did satisfy . Multiply both sides on the left by :
So if a solution exists, then . Turned around: if , no solution can exist, and the system is inconsistent. This is the rule of Section 4.6.1, Case II.
The second line uses associativity of matrix multiplication, and the third uses Theorem 1, , then . Theorem 1 holds even when : the book's verification of it never divides by , it only uses that a row (or column) times its own cofactors gives and times the cofactors of a different row (or column) gives 0. The last line is because here. The argument only works in one direction: would not prove that a solution exists. That is why the book says that in that case the system "may be either consistent or inconsistent".Theorem 1, Section 4.5.1. Lesson: solving systems AX = BCofactors and
Each minor of a matrix is the single entry left after deleting a row and a column, and :
The adjoint is the transpose of the matrix of cofactors, so goes to row 1, column 2. The shortcut for order 2 agrees: swap 1 and 6 on the diagonal, change the signs of 3 and 2. Cofactors exist for every square matrix; only the division by needs .Definition 3, Section 4.5.1. Lesson: the adjointCompute and conclude
is and is , so the product is :
Both entries are non-zero, so . By Step 3, the system is inconsistent: it has no solution.
One non-zero entry would already be enough. With and , Step 3 shows that assuming a solution leads to a contradiction, so none exists.Row times column. Basics: matrix facts the chapter usesSee it directly in the equations
Multiply the first equation by 2:
The second equation says . The same quantity cannot equal both 10 and 8, so no pair satisfies both equations.
Both lines have slope but cross the -axis at different heights, and . Parallel, distinct lines never meet: no solution. Solving each equation for gives and : the same slope, different intercepts. This is the picture behind (same slope) and (different lines). Had the second equation been , the lines would coincide and there would be infinitely many solutions.Same slope, different intercepts: parallel lines. Basics: two lines, cross, parallel or the same
and has entries 6 and , so . The system is inconsistent (no solution). (Textbook answer: Inconsistent.)
Try to make the first equation true and test the second. Points on include , and . For each, is , and : always 10, never 8. Every point of the first line gives 10, because .
And the "what if" in Step 6: with changed to the column with entries 5 and 10, has entries and , so it is , matching the infinitely many solutions in that case.
- Stopping at and writing "inconsistent". alone does not decide it; Q3 is inconsistent only because .
- Writing anyway. does not exist when ; dividing by 0 is meaningless.
- Thinking would prove consistency. The test only works one way; in that case the system needs further checking.
- Computing . A times a is not even defined. The adjoint goes on the left.
- When , compute . If it is not , the system is inconsistent.
- The reason: a solution would force .
- For two unknowns, means equal slopes; then the lines are either parallel (no solution) or the same line (infinitely many).
Every fact used, and where it comes from
| Fact | Used in | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Consistent and inconsistent systems | Steps 5, 6 | Section 4.6 (Lesson: solving systems AX = B) |
| determinant | Step 2 | Section 4.2.2 |
| no inverse | Step 2 | Theorem 4, Section 4.5 |
| Step 3 | Theorem 1, Section 4.5.1 | |
| and inconsistent | Steps 3, 5 | Section 4.6.1, Case II |
| ; adjoint = transpose of cofactor matrix | Step 4 | Definitions 1, 2 (Section 4.4) and 3 (Section 4.5.1) |
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →