Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The one idea this problem is built on
Once the equation is known to hold, multiply it by A−1: each power of A drops by one and 11I becomes 11A−1. That leaves
A2−6A+5I+11A−1=O,
so A−1=−111(A2−6A+5I), built from A2, which we will already have computed. No cofactors are needed.
Given, to find, and the plan
Given
The 3×3 matrix A above; I and O are the 3×3 identity and zero matrices.
To show / find
A3−6A2+5A+11I=O; then A−1.
Plan
(1) A2. (2) A3=A2A. (3) Combine the four terms entry by entry. (4) ∣A∣=0, so A−1 exists. (5) Multiply the equation by A−1. (6) Compute A2−6A+5I and A−1. (7) Check AA−1=I.
Listing the rows and columns of A first makes each entry a mechanical "row i times column j". For example c23 pairs row 2, (1,2,−3), with column 3, (1,−3,3):1−6−9=−14.
Subtracting a negative entry adds: in (2,1),−6⋅(−3)=+18. That sign is where most slips happen, so each row writes the four contributions in the same order.
We are about to multiply by A−1, which is only legitimate if it exists (Theorem 4). The number 11 in the term 11I matching ∣A∣=−11 is not chance: the cubic obtained from ∣xI−A∣ by putting A in place of x always ends in −∣A∣I. That result (the Cayley–Hamilton theorem) is beyond this book and is not needed here.
The distributive law lets us multiply each term separately, all on the right, and associativity lets us regroup, for example (AAA)A−1 as AA(AA−1). Then AA−1=I,XI=X,IA−1=A−1 and OA−1=O. Finally 11A−1=−(A2−6A+5I), and dividing by the number 11 gives the formula.
Multiplying by −111 changes every sign and divides by 11:
A−1=111−3954−1−35−4−1
6A has rows 6,6,6 / 6,12,−18 / 12,−6,18, so for example entry (2,3) is −14−(−18)=4. There is a cross-check with the adjoint. By Theorem 4, A−1=−111adjA, and we found A−1=−111(A2−6A+5I); so the matrix A2−6A+5I must be exactly adjA. Its first row should hold the cofactors of column 1 of A:A11=M11=3 (Step 4); A21=−M21, where M21=1⋅3−1⋅(−1)=4, so A21=−4;A31=M31, where M31=1(−3)−1⋅2=−5. That is 3,−4,−5 ✓.
Check: AA−1=I
Multiply A by the integer matrix, then divide by 11:
The product before dividing is 11I, which is −∣A∣I. That is what Theorem 1 predicts: the integer matrix here is −adjA (Step 6), and A(adjA)=∣A∣I, so A(−adjA)=−∣A∣I=11I.
Result
A3−6A2+5A+11I=O holds, ∣A∣=−11, and
A−1=111−3954−1−35−4−1
(Textbook answer: the same matrix.)
Check it with numbers
Test the equation on the column (1,0,0):A sends it to column 1 of A,(1,1,2);A2 to column 1 of A2,(4,−3,7);A3 to (8,−23,32). Then the first component of A3−6A2+5A+11I applied to it is 8−24+5+11=0, the second −23+18+5=0, the third 32−42+10=0 ✓. Also ∣A−1∣ should be ∣A∣1=−111. Call the integer matrix in the answer P and expand along its row 1:
∣P∣=−3(1−12)−4(−9+20)+5(−27+5)=33−44−110=−121
Now A−1=111P, which is the product (111I)P. By Theorem 3, ∣A−1∣=111I∣P∣, and 111I=1131 (expand along row 1, as in Exercise 4.4 Q17, Step 3). So ∣A−1∣=−1331121=−111 ✓.
Common mistakes
Forgetting the minus sign. From 11A−1=−(A2−6A+5I) the inverse is −111(…), not +111(…).
Adding 5I or 11I to every entry. The identity contributes only on the diagonal.
Reducing A3 to A2 incorrectly. Multiplying A3 by A−1 gives A2, and 5A gives 5I, not 5.
Sign slips with −6 times a negative entry.−6⋅(−3)=+18 and −6⋅(−14)=+84.
What to take away
If A3+pA2+qA+rI=O with r=0, then A−1=−r1(A2+pA+qI).
Check that A−1 exists before multiplying by it; here ∣A∣=−11.
For long matrix computations, write each entry as its own short line; it keeps the signs under control.
Every entry of A2,A3, the combinations and the check
Steps 1–7, Check
Recomputed in the site's verification script
Found an error, or want more?
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →