Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The one idea this problem is built on
A square matrix has an inverse exactly when ∣A∣=0, and then A−1=∣A∣1adjA (Theorem 4, Section 4.5). The formula is Theorem 1, A(adjA)=∣A∣I, divided by the number ∣A∣. So the work is: one determinant, nine cofactors, one transpose, one division, and a final multiplication to confirm. Here no row or column has two zeros, so expect a little more arithmetic, and a negative determinant to carry through to the end.
Given, to find, and the plan
Given
The 3×3 matrix A above.
To find
A−1, if it exists.
Plan
(1) Compute ∣A∣, expanding along row 2 (it contains a zero); check ∣A∣=0. (2) Find all nine cofactors, row by row. (3) Form [Aij] and transpose it to get adjA. (4) Divide by ∣A∣. (5) Verify AA−1=I entry by entry.
Basics you need
1Expanding a 3×3 determinant
Along any row or column: each entry times its sign (−1)i+j times its minor, added up. All six choices give the same value, so choose a line with zeros (Section 4.2.3, Remark (i)). Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant
2Minor, cofactor and sign pattern
Mij is the 2×2 determinant left after deleting row i and column j, and Aij=(−1)i+jMij (Definitions 1 and 2, Section 4.4). Basics: the + − + sign pattern
3Adjoint
adjA is the transpose of the matrix of cofactors (Definition 3, Section 4.5.1). Lesson: the adjoint
The signs along row 2 are −,+,−. Column 3, (3,0,1), also has one zero and would do equally well; any row or column gives the same value (Section 4.2.3). In the second minor, 2⋅1−3⋅(−7)=2+21=23. Theorem 4 says A is invertible if and only if ∣A∣=0, so this one number settles the "if it exists" in the question.
Section 4.2.3, Remarks (i) and (ii): expand along the line with the most zeros, using +1 or −1 as i+j is even or odd. Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant
Cofactors of the row 1 entries
Delete row 1, which leaves rows (4,−1,0) and (−7,2,1), and one column at a time:
All three are nonzero. The middle one has sign −:M12=4 gives A12=−4. In M13,4⋅2−(−1)⋅(−7)=8−7=1: the product of two negatives is positive and is then subtracted.
Hence AA−1=−31(−3I)=I. By Theorem 1, (adjA)A=∣A∣I as well, so A−1A=I too.
The definition of the inverse (Chapter 3, Definition 6) asks for AB=BA=I. The diagonal entries p11,p22,p33 are expansions of ∣A∣ along rows 1, 2, 3; the off-diagonal entries pair a row with the cofactors of another row, and the Note in Section 4.4 says such sums are 0. Getting exactly −3I confirms all nine cofactors at once.
Losing the sign of ∣A∣.∣A∣=−3, so A−1=−31adjA. Using 31 gives −A−1.
Sign slips inside minors.M22=2⋅1−3⋅(−7)=2+21, and M23=2⋅2−1⋅(−7)=4+7.
Forgetting the transpose. For example A12=−4 belongs in position (2,1) of adjA, not (1,2).
Skipping the final check. The product A(adjA) must come out as −3I; any wrong cofactor shows up there.
What to take away
When no row or column has two zeros, expand along a line with one zero (here row 2) and work carefully; Step 1's minors M21 and M22 are reused in Step 3.
A negative determinant flips every sign when you divide.
A(adjA)=∣A∣I checks all nine cofactors in one product.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
Fact
Used in
Source
Expansion along any row or column; signs ±1; choose zeros
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →