Want the reason behind every step, the basics and the checks?
The one idea this problem is built on
Theorem 1 says A(adjA) and (adjA)A both equal ∣A∣I. The reason is visible in the arithmetic: a diagonal entry of either product is a row (or column) of A times its own cofactors, which is an expansion of ∣A∣; an off-diagonal entry is a row (or column) times the cofactors of a different one, which always gives 0. Verifying the theorem means computing ∣A∣, all nine cofactors, and all eighteen product entries, and watching exactly this happen.
Given, to show, and the plan
Given
The 3×3 matrix A above.
To show
A(adjA),(adjA)A and ∣A∣I are equal.
Plan
(1) Find ∣A∣, expanding along column 2 because it has two zeros. (2) Find the nine cofactors and adjA. (3) Multiply A(adjA) entry by entry, then (adjA)A. (4) Compare both with ∣A∣I.
Basics you need
1Expanding a 3×3 determinant
Choose any row or column; multiply each entry by its sign (−1)i+j and its minor, and add. Every choice gives the same value, so pick the line with the most zeros (Section 4.2.3, Remark (i)). Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant
adjA is the transpose of the matrix of cofactors (Definition 3, Section 4.5.1). Lesson: the adjoint
4Matrix product
The (i,j) entry of PQ is row i of P times column j of Q. For two 3×3 matrices each entry is a sum of three products. Basics: matrix facts the chapter uses
5Rows times cofactors
Entries of a row times their own cofactors add up to ∣A∣; times the cofactors of another row they add up to 0 (Remark and Note, Section 4.4). The same holds for columns. Lesson: minors and cofactors
Solution
Find ∣A∣ by expanding along column 2
Column 2 is (−1,0,0): two of its three entries are 0. The signs down column 2 are −,+,− (from the pattern below), so
Any row or column gives the same determinant (Section 4.2.3), so we choose the one that makes the work smallest. With two zeros in column 2, only one minor has to be computed: the terms 0⋅M22 and 0⋅M32 vanish whatever those minors are. M12 is found by deleting row 1 and column 2, which leaves rows (3,−2) and (1,3).
Remarks (i) and (ii) of Section 4.2.3: expand along the line with most zeros, and use +1 or −1 according as i+j is even or odd. Lesson: expanding a 3 × 3 determinant
Cofactors of the row 1 entries 1,−1,2
Delete row 1 (leaving rows (3,0,−2) and (1,0,3)) and one column at a time:
M11 and M13 are 0 because each keeps column 2 of A below row 1, which is (0,0): a 2×2 determinant with a zero column is 0. M12 is the minor we already met in Step 1, and A12=−11 is negative because position (1,2) carries a minus sign.
Row 2 has signs −,+,−. So the negative minor M21=−3 gives the positive cofactor A21=3, while M23=1 gives A23=−1. The zero entry a22 still has a cofactor, A22=1, which we need for the adjoint.
Cofactors of the row 3 entries 1,0,3
Delete row 3 (leaving rows (1,−1,2) and (3,0,−2)):
Position (3,2) has i+j=5, odd, so M32=−8 becomes A32=8. Positions (3,1) and (3,3) have even i+j and keep their minors.
The matrix of cofactors and adjA
[Aij]=032−11180−13
Transpose (row i becomes column i):
adjA=0−11031−1283
Definition 3. Column 1 of adjA is (0,−11,0), the cofactors of row 1; column 2 is (3,1,−1), the cofactors of row 2; column 3 is (2,8,3), the cofactors of row 3.
Look at what each sum is. In symbols,
p11p12=a11A11+a12A12+a13A13=a11A21+a12A22+a13A23
The first is row 1 times its own cofactors, the expansion of ∣A∣ along row 1, so it is 11. The second is row 1 times the cofactors of row 2: that is the expansion of a determinant whose rows 1 and 2 are equal, which is 0. Every diagonal entry is of the first kind and every off-diagonal entry of the second.
Matrix multiplication is not commutative in general, so this second product is a genuinely separate calculation. Here the roles are column-wise: q11=A11a11+A21a21+A31a31 is column 1 of A times its own cofactors, ∣A∣ expanded along column 1; the off-diagonal entries pair a column with the cofactors of a different column and give 0.
Compare with ∣A∣I
∣A∣I=11100010001=110001100011
The three matrices agree in every one of the nine positions, so
A(adjA)=(adjA)A=∣A∣I=11I.
Equal matrices must have the same order and equal corresponding entries. All three are 3×3 with 11 in each diagonal position and 0 elsewhere. This verifies Theorem 1 for this matrix.
(The answer key gives nothing for this question, since it is a verification.)
Check it with numbers
Determinant along row 1, using the cofactors of Step 2:
∣A∣=1⋅0+(−1)⋅(−11)+2⋅0=0+11+0=11
the same as the column 2 expansion of Step 1.
Determinant of the adjoint. The Remark after Theorem 3 gives ∣adjA∣=∣A∣2=121 for a 3×3 matrix. Expanding ∣adjA∣ along its column 1, (0,−11,0), where only the entry −11 in position (2,1) (sign −) survives:
∣adjA∣=−(−11)3−123=11⋅(9+2)=121
Both agree with the theory.
Common mistakes
Expanding along row 1 without need. It works, but column 2 has two zeros and needs only one minor.
Forgetting the minus sign of position (1,2). In Step 1, −a12M12=−(−1)⋅11=+11; dropping either minus sign gives ∣A∣=−11.
Treating zero entries as having zero cofactors.a22=a32=0, but A22=1 and A32=8.
Computing only one product. The question asks for both A(adjA) and (adjA)A.
What to take away
Expand along the row or column with the most zeros.
In A(adjA), diagonal entries are expansions of ∣A∣ and off-diagonal entries use "wrong" cofactors and vanish. That is the whole reason Theorem 1 is true.
Since ∣A∣=11=0, dividing by 11 gives A⋅111adjA=I, so A−1=111adjA: the next exercises use exactly this.
Every fact used, and where it comes from
Fact
Used in
Source
Expansion along any row or column; choose most zeros; signs ±1
Tell us if something on this page is wrong or unclear, or if you would like a fuller explanation, another method or a new feature. Send feedback on this problem →